@NYPDOneill
@NYPDSpecialops
and
@PreetBharara
(Police Commissioner James O'Neill, folks who looked at Anthony Weiner's laptop and US Attorney General New York, respectively) seem to already be aware of pizzagate/podesta/clinton and not compromised. Should people be tagging them with pizzagate EVIDENCE?
Is the goal here only to raise awareness or to get all the evidence to the right people?
I don't want to be off topic and have my thread deleted. This is a real inquiry.
▼ BigFatDaddy
They're all compromised! It'd take a god damn biblical flood to clear away all the accumulated filth.
▼ DarkOne
like Congressman Tray Gowdy? Someone with a clean track-record and legal background would be ideal.
▼ chickyrogue
this!!!!!!!
evidence to the right people preet helped clean the swamp [viper den] in nys he is for real
you get one of my very precious up votes!!!
▼ nnfx
I mean providing them with evidence can't be wrong, unless it's something which isn't already spread on the whole web and could harm in the wrong hands.
The goal here should be to stop them. What ever it takes.
▼ rabbirose
Non Compromised means that AIPAC/FBI doens't have child-porn files on that person. We already know that +95% of every elected official in wash-dc is compromised.
Your talking about trying to find a virgin in a whore house.