I wrote this on a comment to
this question
. But I feel it deserves it's own investigation.
Here are all of
John Podesta's e-mails from 2007
.
A couple of interesting facts:
-
The record begins on May 4th, 2007
.
This
is the oldest e-mail on record in the Podesta WikiLeaks. Either Wikileaks are holding on to prior e-mails for further analysis or... John Podesta created a new e-mail on May 4th, 2007.
-
A lot of the first e-mails on record are of "undelivered e-mails", which is common when you create a new e-mail address, especially back in 2007.
There is something here.
Note that the
oldest Podesta e-mail in the WikiLeaks record
was sent on May 4th, 2007 to
Herbert 'Herb' Sandler
of the
Sandler Foundation
.
Herb Sandler has become a relevant
person of interest
in this investigation, as is the Sandler Foundation. This interest reports to an e-mail chain titled
Martha's Vineyard
.
▼ Freemasonsrus
I would agree. It gives me a headache. But I think if we understand Illuminati/Freemason stuff, then you can start to apply some rationale to their actions. Not that it's rationale any normal person understands. Trust me, I've never delved into any of the types of things in those videos before. But if we can all agree Scientology exist, than its not hard to believe in another and more powerful cult that's been operating in secret for a long time.
▼ Thrash57
No matter the reason thats when the emails start. This shows something. No way he goes to portugal with his brother and then the next day has a new email
▼ Freemasonsrus
Long time lurker from reddit and now here. I've done my own follow up investigation on different subjects as time allows and my brain, (as I'm sure some of yours), gets overloaded on all of the different connections. I listened/watched the following interviews and it helped form a "big picture" that helped me process the information better. Pizzagate is certainly part of the picture, but it's much larger and with different "levels" if you will. I have never been a conspiracy theorist, but this entire Pizzagate thing has been enlightening to say the least.
https://youtu.be/bZtkojaaMm8
https://youtu.be/mV4ZRAQdUno
▼ UncookedSpirit
This is a gmail right? And he probably got hit with a phishing email (there's one in the leaked emails, supposedly). Either he made the email the day after or he deleted all emails so that when someone hacked it and started archiving them all it went back to the day he last deleted everything.
▼ RedPowerRanger
Has been noted before.
A more likely theory is he wiped the server (and destroyed the media) in that time frame, and emails started working again once the new service was brought up.
▼ TheAtlantean
Main post edited to include the wiped server possibility.
▼ dindonufin
there are [email protected] emails from 2000-2006, and about 6 months leading up to may 4, 2007 are missing. Either he deleted them or wikileaks is holding them back (possibly for good reason). Server wipe is unlikely.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/?q=&mfrom=&mto=&title=¬itle=&date_from=&date_to=&nofrom=¬o=&count=50&sort=1#searchresult
▼ TheAtlantean
Main post edited to include this info.
▼ UncookedSpirit
It's a gmail. You really think he could get to a gmail server? Since Eric Schmidt was so high up in the Clinton campaign, maybe, I guess, but NSA would still have all the emails. Let's not forget either than WikiLeaks may be holding back some things or whoever leaked to WikiLeaks didn't want certain things to get out until a different administration could take over and replace the DoJ and avoid Obama pardons. Lots of possible explanations.
▼ Fateswebb
Wasn't podesta a google lobby group?
▼ UncookedSpirit
yes
▼ Fateswebb
Love the name lol.
▼ RedPowerRanger
I believe they had a private internal mail server. yes Gmail and NSA probably have a copy but I doubt we will be able to obtain access to those for evidence.
▼ TheAtlantean
It's nothing short of a credible approach to finding incriminating evidence. Let's pursue.
▼ EndThePizza
For our reasons, is there any effective difference between a wiped server and a new email address? Either way, it suggests he was trying to get rid of incriminating evidence
▼ RedPowerRanger
The failure notifications alone don't give enough information to verify the reason one way or another, but the delays suggest that the end server was not contactable at the time.
▼ anonmoose
it's Stonetear and the Benghazi trails all over again, some of the most suggestive evidence they had was the timing of email wipes with key dates
▼ GenghisSean
Precisely. I'm no lawyer, but it seems like those dates would be admissible in court as intent to destroy evidence.