psmith85

Uh, no we haven't. The whole point of the post was to talk about the Satan/comet theory. I acknowledged that the ping pong/child sex equivalency had already been established. And if Alefantis intentionally bought the sign, he's certainly responsible for it. Sorry.

HeaCel

Nobody claims that James is the original satanist, though. I don't think the fact that he bought the sign is of much significance. The Rothschilds are accused of satanism from the very beginning of their legacy, actually. Interesting read: http://humansarefree.com/2011/09/history-of-house-of-rothschild-complete.html?m=0

HeaCel

Not a bad idea, but let's be careful with confirmation bias.

psmith85

It isn't confirmation bias. I'm noticing four inverted stars; not a coincidence. Some anti-religion people in the 'skeptics' community, e.g. disinfo shill Michael Shermer, refuse to acknowledge the mountains of evidence of some kind of Satanic/occult connection to the power structure. Maybe because it scares them and makes their glib, snarky Jon Stewart-esque personas look like chickensh*t? I don't know. I'm not saying that's you, but those kinds of comments are sometimes used to try to 'shut down' the discussion of these topics. For an example let's take the Monster energy drink can. Clearly that is number of the Beast, with an upside down cross and slogan 'unleash the Beast.' Take this video for a small sampling of the thousands and thousands of exhibits of evidence out there: /watch?v=enxyEw96-b8