( pizzagate )

submitted by [deleted]

heygeorge

Crensch was chosen as O for two main reasons:

  1. Olive branch to Voat community. (Crensch is a long time user. I have certain... Unflattering... opinions of him, but I can say anecdotally that conversing with him a couple days ago was exactly like it has been in the past.

  2. Only one sub owner created a single point of failure. If something happened to kkww or if he decided to nuke the sub, there was no balance.

If Crensch is deleting things he probably shouldn't be, I'm sure he can be approached by kkww and asked to cool off. I think it's in the best interest of the community if both he and Crensch keep their moderation hands light.

concerned1948

Thanks for the message.

  1. A long time user does not mean a trustworthy user as we are clearly seeing. Relevant suspects like Obama and Marina are being deleted while post about eyeballs and blood drinking are being left up ( not saying those are bad posts but just pointing out the hypocrisy in what is related to pizzagate ).

  2. Well adding another mod as admin can create failutre too. I think KKWW wants to make the right decision and probably chose the wrong person.

I really do not like what I am seeing. Hopefully KKWW can calm him/her down.

kingkongwaswrong

I think I've posted a few times to you and your alts explaining my decision, and letting you know what you can do but mainly, read the rules and follow them to a T, and I trust crensch a lot.

heygeorge

  1. Trustworthy enough not to nuke the sub completely. Wouldn't be my first choice, but kkww can prob approach him. Pleas from community won't likely help.

  2. Yes and no and yes. If that's clear. :)

I noticed this thread was deleted before my reply even posted, but technically it doesn't belong so I completely understand that.