Houston: we have a problem. Multiple duplicate threads. ( pizzagate )

submitted by Melitica

We are all here to combine efforts in discovering and uncovering crimes related to pizzagate - child porn is only the tip of the iceberg which leads to money laundering, public manipulation, arms dealing, child trafficking and potentially, treason.

That said, when a new thread is started on an old topic, all of our efforts are diluted as people struggle to reach "aha" moments that have already been reached.

Please, please, please make an attempt to read beyond the first page to check for an existing thread before starting a new one.

In addition, when titling, please limit your use of the words - bombshell, shocking, smoking gun...and phrases like - this is it, I have found it, OMG...or similar. The draw and attraction that is provided momentarily will be lost as soon as the next "shocking" revelation thread is started.

If you care to comment, I would like help in identifying duplicate content threads and welcome your ideas about how we can avoid duplication of threads and efforts.

JrSlimss

The best way to stop redundancy is to use a Wiki like this one: http://www.pizzagate.review/ . MODS need to sticky it!!! On this subject, I'm seeing Epstein threads today with articles that have been already covered in depth here in the Wiki for example.

Flaaffy

I also noticed when I made my post to this subverse that gained a lot of attention (Over 9000 views now), suddenly the subverse was getting slammed with a lot of traffic and posts on any type of Pizzagate article you could easily find through Google. Even articles attempting to discredit Pizzagate were popping up right after I posted. I found it a little strange, and I felt it was an attempt to bury my post and make sure it didn't gain attention.

JoeJoe

I don't know if it is possible;

Could there be an extra step put in before a thread is started.

Eg, an enthusiastic truth seeker puts in a submission and all other threads pop up on that subject, in an order of rating. would be poster then must ascertain (by reading at least one. And this shouldn't be difficult if they are serious about trying to help) whether they are value adding with new info and opt to continue to post.

Just an idea.

28leinad82

omg if i hear about the basement one more time..

ALDO_NOVA

"Has This Been Discussed" = HTBD? would be a nice tag

Melitica

In the last two days there have been at least 9 threads started on the basement of CPP. These threads include

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1458902

‪https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1457890‬

‪https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1455806‬

‪https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1457885‬

‪https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1454769‬

‪https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1456368‬

‪https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1458079‬

‪https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1457299‬

‪https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1454462‬

THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES

We need an effective summary of all confirmed leads posted to the front page.

Flaaffy

Maybe we could make another subverse where we can forward the duplicated threads to? I would hate for a thread to get deleted and the poster have no idea it was because they were reposting information that has already been presented here. I'm worried it may upset the poster into not wanting to contribute and help out the search efforts.

There's also the possibility of the posters accusing the mods of deleting the threads to try and hide information. Everyone is already very skeptical here. I would hate for all of us to start arguing and accusing each other of trying to hide information. We need to work with each other, not against each other, you know?