Anyone remembering this tweet?

EndThePizza 2016-12-04T09:04:43

I can't figure out what's going on with Wikileaks. The WhereIsAssange group thinks Assange was captured/wikileaks was compromised in mid-October. I have to say, given the events at that time and the behavior since, it sounds like a reasonable assumption. But I have remembered this tweet - it's how I learned about Pizzagate. It puts a kink in the whole timeline. If wikileaks was compromised at the time, why would they have sent out a lead to the biggest anti-Clinton information in history?

link

Freemasonsrus 2016-12-04T04:24:55

I would say that just like him, there are actual "good guys" ( meaning not involved with the evil ones) who are working inside those places. Like him, they are a great source of information on the goings on inside of those orgs. I would guess they're also a dog whistle to those inside who know that they aren't involved with this crap.

link

Freemasonsrus 2016-12-04T03:45:39

How deep has anyone gone on who Laura Silsby is? All I've read is about her activities in Haiti and the strange story about her mustard colored home. But no real background info on her.

As an aside, has anyone done any digging on Bitcoin? I may have missed it but it seems to have some possible connections, possibly as the preferred way to pay for all things regarding CP. Brock Pierce is heavily involved in Bitcoin. He was a childhood actor accused of pedophilia after being one of the founders of Den. (Den was supposed to be the first version of YouTube/Netflix and had raised over 100mill to get started, but all they did was rent a huge mansion and lure boys into the actual perverted den to rape and molest) He then went on to have a hugely successful co called IGE which buys and sells cash in "World Of Warcraft" and other games. He then went on to make lots of money with his involvement in Bitcoin. I don't even understand how Bitcoin works exactly so maybe someone here can break that down and explain why it would be a preferred form of payment. I assume at the least it is anonymous form of payment.

link

Freemasonsrus 2016-12-04T03:32:45

I have kind of assumed there were two possibilities w Wikileaks: 1) It's 100% compromised, Assange was taken to a black ops site or worse, and his assorted workers were shutdown. Or 2) that Trump's team told them to hold off. He's got great Intel. He had inside info before he ever ran. So my theory is he felt releasing the info may cause more damage to the election vs good, as in a scandal so large it allows Obama to try to stop election if Hillary was no longer an option. So it's possible Trump made a deal, hold off on release, lay low and wait till the election is over. If Trump is elected wait until after Jan 20 to drop any bombs. If Hillary wins, then drop the bombs, but don't disrupt the election.

I've seen Trump play so many psyop games on these POS's it's been enjoyable to watch.

link

Mmag1234 2016-12-04T07:26:42

Number 2 is a reach, all respect. Wiki has been compromised and we have NOT had any real proof of life - nothing verifiable at all - since around October 14.

link

Freemasonsrus 2016-12-04T08:16:48

I don't disagree. I always choose to be optimistic until there's no reason left for optimism. It certainly looks bad right now, but the one thing I keep thinking is Assange has had nothing but time for four years, plus plenty of experience before this, to plan for all possible eventualities. For instance, if I were him I'd have had someone specifically offline that also had access to DMS if he were to go missing. Someone completely unknowable and untraceable. And the second thing is, all of his workers in different countries were taking extreme measures to mask their locations. What are the odds that all of those different locations would be found and disabled simultaneously? I guess my main point is that I have quite a bit of faith in Assange's ability to outsmart them one way or another, and certainly the most incentive to do so.