Yet, in it, he says that everyone was locked down for an hour. then claims to have interviewed some lawyer called Slimy or something, and write the story. There is another voat thread, which catches him out even earlier than the twitter does.

It is 4:03pm here now. His last tweet was 17 minutes ago, at 8:46pm... and his first tweet about the story says over 7hrs ago at 1;14pm. In that very article, he says it happened at 3:00pm. He also says no shots, and then one shot. Later he says more than one shot! Then says later still, no shots. i do not know if he is just nervously making these mistakles, or trying to blow the whistle subconsciously, but either way, this needs establishing beyond all shade of a doubt.

I am on Australian time.

He says he knows the name, then says the police have not released the name, he says there was no shots fired, and then that there was a shot fired; all in the first article he tweeted -1:14 pm. Then in the article itself, he says it happened at 3:00 pm. He had already interviewed people, that had been locked down for an hour. Add to that, how long it to write, and we have a breakthrough! Either that, or Benjamin has a time machine. Maybe this was his way of confessing, maybe a subconscious cry for help. Every person involved in this, on some level, has a deep abhorrence of what is happening. They usually are very good at rationalising it away, but it comes up, and reminds them, when it can, in ways like this.

There is a post about this on frontpage. Somebody said this is a known Google bug.

he says they have his name, and then says, the police have not released his name. He has already done interviews with the people who were locked down for an hour. That means, it is an hour earlier. Add however long it would take to wrote the article, and we either have a breakthrough, or Benjamin has a time machine. Either way, it is the story if the century. In one comment made on the page, when Benjamin first started his job at DC was " he looks very shifty, we better keep our eye on him for a good while"

Benjamin knew the name, and motive of the person, at 1;14!

Someone should record a video with realtime on your computer and the upload of the article before it turns to 1 day then archive it.

And every five minutes, he is frantically updating the story. First there was no shots fired, and then he knew what kind of gun it was and so on. If people only knew, how transparent their lies are. The truth adds up in so many ways. All of those ways need to corroborate. Even a genius, is not able to account for all the factors. Especially not under scrutiny. Come clean Benjamin! It is probably the only card you have left to play at this stage. Pedophile protector, caught trying to manipulate the press, or hero, who blew the whistle, and saved children. Which sounds better? I know you are reading this. I am not telepathic, just sensible. That is all you really need to be, and the truth becomes plain to see.

Posted the first time, on Twitter at 1:14! He is in damage control about it now... https://twitter.com/brfreed/status/805520670893412352?lang=en

Yep. Still shows as posted 11 hours ago, which is several hours before it actually happened!

I believe the story is cooked early so they can make time to fudge some comments and upvotes to make it seem important.

Here are the results

I'm hearing people are seeing different results, but in my case, it shows the # of hours of how old it is.

If you go to the article and view the source if shows the article was published at 16:10.
Not saying this is conclusive, as it could easily be doctered but it hinders the theory.

<meta property="article:published_time" content="2016-12-04T16:10:18-05:00" />
<meta property="article:modified_time" content="2016-12-04T21:08:26-05:00" />
<meta property="og:updated_time" content="2016-12-04T21:08:26-05:00" />
<meta property="fb:app_id" content="1728588847358162" />

I saw it there. At 6:00 pm west coast time, it said the article was published 9 hours ago. What time are they saying it happened at?

I do see that, but I'm not sure how accurate the time stamp is. We definitely need someone with knowledge of Google's algorithm to look into this

The "incident" happened just before 3PM. Why does it show the article being uploaded 2 hours before the incident??

http://i.imgur.com/lUZdqE4.png

I see (3) articles when searching for Washingtonian. The earliest from them was (4) hours ago = 5:00 p.m. eastern time.

EDIT: It's suppressed. If I search for the article title "man with gun arrested" I see that it was posted around 11:16 am eastern time.

If you google this: "washingtonian"

https://www.google.com/#q=washingtonian

And check the "Top Stories" or "In the News" section, does the "N Hours Ago" show that this article was posted prior to 3pm DC time?

It seems to for me, just want others to verify it, or verify I'm crazy. Thanks.

Edit: This is what I see: Image