Prediction: Another False Flag ( pizzagate )

submitted by connornm777

This isn't about anything supporting the theory or a new lead (we've gone dry on leads lately, no doubt a lot of them are getting cleaned up) but this is just a note on how the elites could resolve this issue and save themselves. We have to put ourselves in the shoes of the people involved to figure out their next move.

So after trying one false flag, they are able to denounce pizzagate by making it a moral issue and not addressing the stronger arguments of our case. Luckily it was non-violent and nobody was hurt.

However, this incident was also not very effective. It was sloppy, it got more people interested in pizzagate, and they weren't able to push the moral angle too hard because the guy really didn't hurt anybody. They would've had much more support censoring and dismissing us if someone actually WAS killed. Their M.O. is using emotional manipulation to obscure facts, even if it means having to create a tragedy.

Now, I don't know exactly what Alefantis status is in these circles, but if he's someone they could all agree to off, given the circumstances, it would be the perfect crime. Just frame it on a "deranged alt-right conspiracy theorist" and you've simultaneously tied up a loose end and given a life-time supply of ammunition to every TV-pundit to attack anyone who believes this theory, not to mention a much more viable reason to censor us.

Of course there'd be a big show of this family getting interviewed on every news station, it'd be a national tragedy. His death would serve as a "lesson" on how we should not spread malicious "lies" on the Internet, and anyone that so much as mentions the word pizzagate will be seen as morally bankrupt for shitting on his memory.

The only thing is it would require a lot of setup, and if he has a very high status among the elite, it is unlikely to happen. They also are probably not very keen on killing their own, because they don't want anyone getting nervous thinking they're next and spilling the beans. This would be a risky move, but their back is almost up against a wall and it's definitely in line with they operate.

Anyway just a theory. If not this I expect something crazy to happen within a couple months.

VioletHeart

I have another theory..could the police have hired him to get into comet and do a search without needing a warrant..am sure they locked down the restaurant for a couple of hours.

Ziggystrife

Optimistic but doubtful. This was nothing more than a "see how dangerous fake news is" false flag. Now they can deem anyone talking about pizzagate as a potential threat. Talk about pizzagate in public as anything more than fake news and you had better believe some shill will report you to the authorities. Be careful out there.

argosciv

A 'good' false-flag? Interesting theory, would upvoat but I hit my limit for the day.

VioletHeart

Thanks..I already posted this theory yesterday and was branded a shill and got a few down votes...just thought it was another possibility

argosciv

I'd point out though, that the cameras being turned away priot and then back afterward, is rather suspicious. But I also seem to recall reading somewhere, that the camera redirection claim was disinfo?

Another point of interest is the recent attack against the parent of a Sandy Hook victim(sic), which seems to be part of a pattern when coupled with the CPP shooter... Strange...

connornm777

If so they're pretty dumb police. He didn't accomplish a whole lot in terms of gathering evidence.

VioletHeart

Not the gunman finding evidence..the police ..they would've had to gone in there to see what the gunman had done.. take photos ..they must have gone into the office that he supposedly shot

connornm777

Ah, I misunderstood. Good point. Maybe, but something tells me there are people who would and could stop them from investigating.

r3dtr1x

All the foil hatters are claiming Sunday's incident was a false flag, lol. Worst, calmest false flag ever. Just for the sake of this discussion, let's entertain the theory that Sunday's incident was, in fact, a false flag.

IF this was a false flag, then immediately, the Streisand effect took over and pizzagate was all over the mainstream media, causing even MORE people to research it and spread the information even further.

It's much more likely that Sunday's incident was.. in fact.. someone emotionally charged, like so many of us have been, who thought he'd just storm the place and find all the evidence himself. He didn't find anything. He also didn't hurt anyone, so the "false flag" narrative is really, really silly.

connornm777

Actually false flag makes more sense still, the media is just somewhat incompetent. If they were aware of the Striessand effect and this wasn't a false flag, they wouldn't give it this much coverage.

connornm777

Yeah, tbh the jury is still out for me on him. The thing that does suggest it's a false flag is the camera.

argosciv

There's many valid points to suggest that it was a false-flag, calmer than usual, sure, but a controlled and scripted event nonetheless.

DarkMath

The only problem is someone so enraged to go into a restaurant with an assault rifle doesn't have the mental clarity to calm down. It reminds me of a saying by tank crews. Once you load in a round it's only coming out on the other end. Once a dude loses his temper like Edgar did he ain't gonna calm down anytime soon. Ever hear of a near mass shooting? No? Me neither.

BAD_RAPPER

Off topic but he didn't use an assault rifle, those are fully automatic

DarkMath

Sigh.......No assault rifles aren't fully automatic (although they can be). They're not full automatic because armies the world over frown upon giving soldiers fully automatic weapons as you will very quickly run out of ammunition on full auto. Soldiers are INTENTIONALLY given weapons that only fire one shot per trigger pull, with a max of three shots per pull in some cases. Fully automatic is N shots per trigger pull as in as long as the trigger is pulled bullets are firing until you run out of ammunition..........Face Palm........I worry at the fate of my country..........

BAD_RAPPER

In all cases, my M4 in the army was fully automatic and then semi automatic. Assault weapons must have fully automatic or burst fire capabilities. My point was I doubt that he was using a class III weapon and it's not a big deal I just get irked when people use that term

DarkMath

The M4 was never full automatic, having only single or 3 shot burst options. The M4A1 can fire fully automatic. Both are considered assault rifles. ;-)

r3dtr1x

Emotionally charged doesn't mean enraged. It means he was motivated to go investigate. If he had his mind set on shooting people, he would have shot people. You are right, I've never heard of a "near mass shooting" and this wasn't anything like that.

You don't know what was in his head, and it's foolish to think you are psychic and understand his thought processes. Where he comes from, in NC, open carry is fully legal. He may not have realized open carry was illegal in DC.

DarkMath

So that's like the scene from Full Metal Jacket when Private Pile loses it and is in the head loading an M-14 and Sargent Heartman comes in and Private Pile says......"You know Sargant, you ARE right. My mommy and daddy didn't show me enough attention. After I lay my rifle down on the deck at my feet would you kindly escort me to the nearest mental health facility? ....Thank You!"

argosciv

The plausibility is troubling, to say the least.