The evidence is overwhelming but circumstantial in virtually all cases. The story loses validity when we start to apply it to specific people, because it looks insane without first discussing the history of child abuse rings.
The main "Fakeness" of it is simply that the fringe members and shrills sometimes state conclusions without bulletproof evidence, which would seem like zealotry to someone that hasn't done any research, nor even understands the process of critical though.
My advice is to focus on things we know are true. For instance: Jeffery Epstein served 15 months of a 18 month sentence for prostitution with a 14 year old. He owns an island. ...then you go from there. You point out that society as a whole accepts that reality and chooses to ignore it...I encourage everyone to allow the person your informing to take in the information on their own terms and be patient. When ideas are forced on someone they are instantly a hoax to them.
▼ Anonymous987654321
keep on digging into comet ping pong, james alefantis, john podesta, stratfor, hilary clinton, etc dont let this guy divert your attention.
May the Force be with you all.
▼ Princeofcats
Really? I'm trying to tell you how to explain this to normies.
▼ Cantilever
Nice try trying to divert our attention away from the guilty
▼ fvckh1m_up
Don't shill troll.
▼ Princeofcats
Really? How does what I'm saying divert you? I'm trying to explain why people will reject this regardless of how damning it is: it's easier to live a lie for some so fucking spoon feed them.
▼ fvckh1m_up
Don't feed the shill troll.
▼ Princeofcats
Division and subjectivity are the biggest obstacles to this. The more people you're willing to engage with honesty and objectivity, the more likely justice becomes. That's all I'm trying to say. Even if I'm a shill, that's still true: and that's my point.
▼ fvckh1m_up
I mean, no forget about it. nevermind
▼ fvckh1m_up
The only thing you need to understand is that the evidence is not circumstantial, it's symptomatic