Each day the community is finding countless leads and things that in any other case would lead to prosecution.
We know that now, we also know the incredible veil thats been placed over basically anything that mentions pizzagate, or any other of the assorted hashtags on the web.
I can guarantee that the agencies are doing everything they can to make sure that the people who are unaware of pizzagate do not simply stumble across our troves of information.
Hashtags have always been praised as a way to consolidate information, though if you think from law enforcements point of view it also
provides the perfect way to target their attack on us.
The problem at the moment is that such a high percentage of the world have no idea this is even happening on this forum, and as we all know - the way that most people find topics are from google.
I think we need to avoid the censorship and start distributing flyers on public transport.
Our community is consistently climbing a few hundred people a day, though just image how much faster that would be happening if people legitimately knew.
I think we need to recognise that mass controlling of general consensus is very real, and to get people to jump across to our side they will need to have it shoved in front of their faces and spoon fed to them. Once people see the information, the rest is easy.
▼ bidentime
pizzagate is shadow banned from my twitter feed but I get results froma search. Much of it is disinformation, but some stuff can still be found.
▼ The_Invincible_Moose
One of the problems with this idea is that #pizzagate is completely decentralized and disheveled at this point, and social media is trying really hard to keep it that way by various means. That makes it impossible for newcomers to discern what to look at first. If it's too much of a headache, people won't take the time. So we need a centralized hub of pizza-related material geared for consumption by noobs, not research by weaponized autism.
A thought: How about something like a wiki page with an organized index and topics/sub-topics and cross-linking. It's a big ordeal, but imagine passing out flyers with a URL/qrcode that goes straight to a place people can quickly and incrementally learn about everything we know.
It would also rule out censorship. Twit, fakebook and utube would have a harder time justifying
pizzawiki
Edit: Just saw the links at the bottom of the page for the first time. That's what I get for using mobile :/ http://pizzagate.review is heading in the right direction, but not nearly polished enough for somebody stepping into pizzagate for the first time.
▼ in4theLongRun
Do we have a special thread set up for sound bites, media, memes.. I think there was a thread talking about PR at this point it's clear we might have to dived into groups or divide our attention 1/2 research/investigation 1/2infowars/meme wars/ info spreading
▼ ThorTheWonderful
Speaking of evidence searching, I go on to search for micro cameras, is there anything now days, smaller than the Exxon Valdez? I had smaller cameras at work 30 years ago.
Anyway, I was thinking at this point, our law is out of order and we have to take measures into our own hands that we need to take special steps to catch these people because they sure as hell ain't gonna let us just catch them and we could build a mountain of circumstantial evidence.. Or a planet of it for that matter.. And no matter what, our entire gov is fully invalidated. We are the law now!
▼ fvckh1m_up
dude it s both the memes and the documentation.
▼ peteczar
the posters in the sidebar are great at getting some interest levels up. they are printable size too.
▼ Princeofcats
Yeah. Flyers might be good. I engage everyone I know at some level: not necessarily the current research but the long history of child abuse by powerful people. I focus on proven cases and and connections to lay a foundation and then present the speculation.
And I use social media - it's not totally censored yet but it'll get you fired I'm sure. Clinton is spinning this right now, and the legacy News is using the FakeNews narrative to its advantage in some ways. I tag old cases of child abuse and such as "FakeNews" from so-called reputable news sources to illustrate how they're ignoring they're own reports.
We have to chip away at the mass psyche that basically doesn't want to deal with this information. We have to do this while shills and impatient people will undermine our position. I stress rational arguments and allowing people to,come to terms with it with a bit of patience. This is the last taboo, really.
▼ toadog123
Agreed. I think a big problem is that you see what you align with on Facebook. so for us, sure it appears semi-uncensored - we're looking for it. Though for those who aren't yet aware, there isn't anyway to get that initial exposure without being confronted by the first page google articles.
One morning soon we're all going to wakeup someone with a large audience will have reported, and shit will hit the fan. I absolutely cannot wait
▼ Princeofcats
Until then every conversation counts.