What ultimately caused David Brock to become a Democrat after writing numerous hit pieces against the Clintons? ( pizzagate )

submitted by AFriend

I have done a bit of research, and I can't seem to find out what caused that 180 degree change in his entire world view...

All that seems to pop up about the issue is: "My own research made me realize I was wrong about Hillary and the Clintons." That is about the most absurd reason I have ever heard.

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/03/david-brock-bill-clinton-hillary-clinton-104976

Death threat? Blackmail? Money? Children???

EDIT: Since he was married to Alefantis, we should find out what made him have his "change of heart" so that we may use that as leverage against him (if needed)

Orange_Circle

Looks like Brock might be yesterday's news to Alefantis. Has he moved on to a younger chap?

https://archive.is/0z2sE/de8e8d2bab7b592d86314b87e59fc818485be870.jpg

AFriend

awesome.

anyone have an ID?

ALDO_NOVA

keep your enemies close - or kill them

jonnythaiwongy9

Clearly on cocaine or ecstasy there.

Orange_Circle

If anyone ever takes a closer look at his ties to Mary Pat Bonner and how they skimmed off a part of each big money donation as they transferred it from pac to pac....

Orange_Circle

He's a poofer. They do crap like that.

MeatballPizza

YOU'RE THINKING ABOUT THIS IN THE WRONG WAY.

There are not two parties in America.

This is one party: The Uniparty.

They are both controlled by the same masters. The politicians you see are only puppets for the people behind the scene. They give to both parties and fool the American people into thinking they have some kind of choice.

Democrat. Republican. Two sides of the same coin. It didn't matter which group he chose to work for because, push comes to shove, they are working together to screw Americans - figuratively and literally.

jonnythaiwongy9

Defo, while there are some decent folk, its a lot like pedophile priests or dirty cops, they get in because it allows them to do what they want. Mao didn't believe in Communism at least not the first long time he was in it, it was a means to power.

GeorgeHodelDidit

This..........i finally accept this.......I was a conservative.......trusted the Republicans......but not now. I finally fucking get it. I have been suspicious for a while. I just couldnt believe they would kill 3000K people in 9/11.

I didnt understand the whole Globalist Moneyed Satanic Pedophile angle. That was my red pill. The Pedophile shit in both parties....both sides cover it up. I finally understand that the kid sacrifices are central.. It gives them blackmail on each other. It shows each other how far they would go. And it makes them all have a stake in covering it up. It is the glue behind the money. Like sealing each other together and becoming blood brothers...literally.

MeatballPizza

Exactly. Someone messaged me that Kasich and Hastert went to 'parties' together and named a couple other names that sounded like plausible attendees. They are all in this together. They take turns driving the bus, but they are all along for the ride.

Watch this 5 minute speech that got Judge Napolitano for saying there's really only one party in America. It got him fired from Fox News:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgGnBCDfCLM

AFriend

Thank you for this video.

chickyrogue

money

AFriend

This article is great. It was Sid Blumenthal who became Brock's mentor.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2012/02/24/david-brock-self-styled-martyr-of-the-radical-totalitarian-left/

Brock was looking for a guru, and he found one in Blumenthal. Blumenthal hooked up with Brock, the heretofore right-wing assassin, and helped him craft an apologia for journalistic high crimes against the Clintons – a.k.a. “the politics of personal destruction.” The fact that it was Blumenthal, a master of personal destruction, proclaiming the evils of that tactic was ironic, to say the least, even to Blumenthal’s liberal media allies. For Brock, though, this was simply a graduation to the next level – one with better funding, lavish parties, and magazines with better newsstand placement. Brock was only happy to play along with Blumenthal’s emerging meme: The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.

Sharipie

The question is not what, but how much.

Blacksmith21

He got trapped inside a 7 year old and someone had a Polaroid camera handy. Oops.

IAmJohnBarron

probably got honey potted

dindonufin

he was pujol'd

lawfag123

or honeydicked

hedy

This could be quite compelling if you could put together a timeline of articles, associations and events.

remedy4reality

Honestly, I think Brock is a figure much like Guy Bannister in the JFK plot. He is an overlord of lower operatives, like Alefantis. There was a gay subplot to Bannister's background, as well.

pizzaequalspedo

I've wondered about this as well. I do find it amusing that every MSM article about him describes him as a "former right wing political hitman" as if it was just two years ago that he had an epiphany and switched.

derram

https://archive.is/BaMkq :

Brock muses on his Clinton evolution - POLITICO

This has been an automated message.

Nana66

Well Neera Tanden in a wikileaks email to I believe Podesta, expressed suspicion he was a plant because she felt he was actually detrimental to Hillary's campaign but I'm thinking blackmail or plain old they paid him more.

AFriend

I'll have to look up that email. Thanks

AFriend

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/50143

Yup; I remember this one now.

Strange, the way they talk about Brock... like he is an outsider.

Media Matters/Correct the Record's master isn't as close to the Clintons as he probably thinks he is...

VictorDaniels777

All of the above.