If you havent read it yet, Wikipedia is citing this NYT article as main proof for debunking Pizzagate ( pizzagate )

submitted by Gottor

Here is the New York Times article from 2016/12/10: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/10/business/media/pizzagate.html?_r=0 (here saved on archive.is if you dont want to give NYT clicks: https://archive.is/qKS21) ). Here the wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_(conspiracy_theory)

Even though this NYT article does discuss more of our evidence as most of the other MSM, they still appear to selectively omit what evidence not to cover (such as, more of the Podesta Emails, Alefantis instagram pictures, the Clinton Foundation connection, the Norway Pedo bust, etc). It may be useful if someone could address the flaws in the article in detail.

NOTE: I think obtaining better evidence for the pizza code words in Podesta's emails is a crucial first step to show that pizzagate is real. It would be beneficial for the pizzagate investigation to show that "pizza" is a code word for pedophilia (otherwise, some may argue that pizza could be a code word for something else, such as drugs). For that matter, the "walnut" term is likely not a pedo code word, and may actually refer to sauce; unlike the usage of the "pizza" term, which is especially clear to stand for something else in this Email as well: https://wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/18/18817_re-headcount-for-pizza-.html

Laserchalk

Notice how they didn't talk about the instagram photos of various children on James's account? They only talked about the instagram photos of Obama that I haven't even notice anyone talk about here. They make it seem like they refuted the photos when they didn't even talk about the right ones.

Melitica

Wikipedia page listed pizzagate as false the day it went up. Before NYT article.

Sui_Juris

Send people here instead https://infogalactic.com/info/Pizzagate

Sui_Juris

This is why some dope crew created the awesomeness that is Infogalactic

https://infogalactic.com/info/Pizzagate

They are doing to Wikipedia what Gab is doing to Twitter. There's even a Firefox add-on that auto-forwards Wikipedia links to Infogalactic.

Gottor

Really appreciate you showing us this new encyclopedia, truly thank you @Sui_Juris . FYI I posted it as a main thread to spread the word: https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1480491

Sui_Juris

My pleasure, it's fun to be helping everybody push forward!

WE ARE LEGION

AdVict0riam

Wait.

They're citing Fake News on Wikipedia now? ;-)

MenaAirport

Wikipedia was bought and paid for by the globalists a long time ago. Their "citations" are laughable.

stens

Wikipedia is compromised. Their admins collude with TPTB to shut down any opposition. The narrative was set as "debunked conspiracy theory" from Day 1.

Gottor

Agreed Wikipedia was biased against Pizzagate from the start. However, we must be aware of their postings, as most people, when wanting to know about something they dont know much about, start off by checking wikipedia.

betadynamique

Wiki--what?

Gottor

Here's the wikipedia page on pizzagate, alleging that pizzagate has already been debunked: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_(conspiracy_theory)

derram

https://archive.is/qKS21 :

Dissecting the #PizzaGate Conspiracy Theories - The New York Times

This has been an automated message.