I just want to point out that if you read the explanation that it sorta accounts for all of your questions. The guy explains that he doesn't have any affiliation with wikileaks except that he is in possession of the emails and keys to dead man switches that he will release. Not saying it's not fake but that certainly would explain why it's hosted on a host that wikileaks doesn't like, because supposedly it isn't affiliated with wikileaks so they wouldn't have bias against any host. The guy claims the original intent was to find Assange.

Can you explain pls, what you mean by a movement to suppress? Thanks.

lol.... Your keyboard alright over there? You pop the keys off pounding them feverishly writing that, "dumbass"? --- My quick reply was that those who are downloading this know what they are doing. I wasn't giving implicit instructions on how to view, was pointing out to Nerdy Noodle that it's possible.

Calm down.

Like that guy in the office that always wants to be right and is more or less a nuisance that you never want to talk to.

199.59.243.120 --> support.findingassange.com --> new york

185.27.134.118 --> findingassange.com --> UK

ODD

support.findingassange.com

some black window pops up half a second and closes right after, will try to snapshot it.

According to http://www.whois.com/whois/findingassange.com the domain was resold by NAMECHEAP.COM so I wouldn't be surprised that the person who registered the domain had no idea that Namecheap got domains from Enom.

Also I don't think Enom is terribly well known because this is the first I had seen about them. Hopefully the site doesn't get pulled but even if it did I'd expect the keys to get out if the person who made the site was serious.

You cant prove shit buddy. Crawl back in your hole

Excellent work!

I'm fully expecting trollface to pop up once the timer reaches zero.

It's not? I'm not a tech whiz, but know enough to get by. I show that the registrar is enom. What do you know? can You screenshot what you have and explain it? If I'm wrong, I'll delete this thread.

How the hell did they find 125 unbiased journalists? It is hard to find 1.

Either the password hashes will work when released, or they won't.

Shameless clickbait. You didn't prove anything.

No need to prove, it's obvious. But thanks for the confirmation.

If they release the encryption keys for two of the previously released insurance files, you will not need to download anything from this website. A copy and paste should suffice. If the promised two keys do not open the insurance files released prior to 10-17-2016, which have been verified with a WikiLeaks released SHA256 hash, then it is a fraud and nothing they publish should be trusted.

"enom" proves nothing. If you wanted to set up a website on the cheap, you may end up going through enom, just because they are a large company that does this domain registry.

ONE DAY LEFT until more are leaked.

So you're making a new website with all of Assange's work, and call up the hosting company that you specifically called a ban on due to free speech issues years prior. No. Plus, this company has a history of shutting down sites that it disagrees with. The article says that the issues were with free speech. So why would this company even bother keeping up the site if it has such a lush history of silencing those who don't agree.

interesting find, but i wouldn't exactly call it proof that something juicy could be released.

Indeed an awful company. Strange. Did you contact findingassange and ask them for an explanation?

Well that sucks.

I have to go with honeypot, then. And I certainly wouldn't download anything from that site.

I was told today that's a proxy from Panama.

This isn't WIKILEAKS.

This is something else. Likely the Anon folks from 4chan who hacked Podesta a couple weeks before the election. They also hacked his Twitter and posted crazy stuff on it publicly. His Twitter was taken down. They had his Apple iCloud contents. All of it. It's never been published before.