Finally a "Debunking" article that addresses things. ( pizzagate )

submitted by shootermcgvn

From the MSM, but they actually address a lot of evidence put forth.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/12/10/business/media/pizzagate.html?_r=1

They get the timeline completely wrong, skirt past a couple issues like the "handkerchief," but some of it at least gave some decent answers that are rational enough to actually "debunk" claims.

I'm still wondering why Podesta has creepy CP paintings and stuffed animals in his house.

jonnythaiwongy9

They're upping their propaganda game definitely, that list of questions going round should put this to bed. NYT can skim thru already debunked wild speculation from idiots all it wants, they can answer none of the hard questions.

Thakiddds

Main point of article - military style weapon.

shootermcgvn

I'm getting downvoted. This is what we want, people. Actual answers. The moment we get some all of a sudden anyone bringing it up is a shill? It's like the_donald all over again in here.

AdVict0riam

This actually a good thing. It shows that their efforts to sway public opinion by just yelling "FAAAAAAKE" over and over have utterly failed, and now they actually have to address some of the real issues and evidence.

shootermcgvn

My thoughts exactly.

I don't like how they completely ignored the handkerchief email, but at least they posted the fucking thing so people can see it.

atheist4thecause

They did mention the handkerchief in the connections at the top at least. I don't have the time to read it all right now, but a skim over and it looks like it's at least addressing information (legitimately or not). Thanks for the post!

Orange_Circle

do they cover Spirit Cooking and Podesta's pedophiles art?