AreWeSure

Whats the connection between any of the facts you mention?

Your headline is not supported by anything in your post.

Event A happened.
Later event B happened. This does not prove A caused B. It does not even indicate A caused B.

This seems like a former employee of Podesta, networking. You haven't even shown that nonpublic information is being discussed.

Also this guy wants the lawyer to meet Podesta, yet you put it the other way round.

The SEC is investigating SunEdison for public statements it made to investors. It is not investigating HRC or the Podestas.

This article on the SEC investigation doesn't even mention insider trading https://www.google.com/amp/www.wsj.com/amp/articles/sec-investigating-sunedisons-disclosures-to-investors-about-its-liquidity-1459207385?client=ms-android-sprint-us

Anonomous_pizza

Thank you.

It was just something I thought was peculiar. It is only speculation. I was just putting out there in case anybody came by some more info.

Cantilever

Interesting find. What do you predict will come of the investigation?

senpaithatignoresyou

If he sends it to the SEC, they will investigate

Anonomous_pizza

Nothing