John Podesta: Pedophile Toymaker

Such important work you're doing, posting a link and uhh whatever else

Their breakdown of Pizzagate was an absolute embarrassment. It's like they followed some script instead of starting with the DKIM WikiLeaks Emails.

We ought to meme it or something whenever anyone brings up Snopes' track record, because according to the site itself, this is what is meant when an entry on the site is marked as Undetermined:

Yellow bullets generally describe disputed claims — factual items which the available evidence is too contradictory or insufficient to establish as either true or false. This category also includes claims that have a kernel of truth to them but are not literally true as stated. (For example, an entry that read "Soupy Sales was fired for asking children to send him 'little green pieces of paper' on his TV show" would fit this classification because even though Soupy Sales did make such a request, he was not fired for doing so.) Some legends also fall into this classification when it cannot be determined whether the legends preceded similar real life events, or vice-versa.

It doesn't take a PHD in Human Biology to figure out that what is being depicted in that obviously faked image is a physical impossibility in more ways than one as our eyes are built into our eye sockets and directly connected to our brain; they cannot detach at will as the image depicts.

Note that the author of this article, Kim LaCapria, also authored one of the most absurd Snopes articles I've ever seen, the one about Eric Braverman: ( http://www.snopes.com/eric-braverman-seeks-asylum-in-russia/ ). Notice that the article appears to be published unfinished (it never gives information about Braverman's disappearance or whereabouts and has gone entirely without update in the nearly two months since his disappearance during which we've heard about the credible theory that the FBI used the Russian asylum theory as a diversion tactic in order to move Braverman. (Not that I necessarily know the FBI has Braverman, but I hope that is the case.)

Looks familiar , from that shitty Hancock movie

http://archive.is/rVvYh

Reminder that according to Snopes, this quite blatantly photoshopped image could be real. That's all you should ever need to know about that site.

Yep, that's them alright.

Here's a video of the two: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XS7XFilpnLs

According to Snopes:

WHAT'S TRUE: Police in Pasco County were surprised to discover a symbol similar to secretive coding used by pedophiles on a Monster Jam souvenir toy.

It was an exact match.

WHAT'S FALSE: The presence of imagery similar to the symbol poses a risk to children.

ORLY pretty sure parents need to determine if that's true or not for themselves. May the last sane, not-evil parents on Earth make the right judgement call.

WHAT'S UNDETERMINED: How the symbol came to appear on the Monster Jam toy and the extent of its actual use by pedophiles.

Someone designed it that way. Someone else approved it. Then it was manufactured.

The extent of the symbol's use is widespread enough that the FBI documented it.

You're welcome, Snopes.

The bad thing is that Facebook is using Snopes as one of their "fact checking" sites to verify "real" news versus "fake" news. The whole list of sites they use to label news is liberal and fake. End game result...discredit any true news that does not fit their agenda. Thus the general public never hears the truth.

Discredit Snopes and win the minds of millions. Who's up to the challenge?

This is disinformation. Do not trust anything on Snopes. They were created to mock truth.

Soros discrediting the truth.