SheSaidDestroy

Here Snopes trips over themselves yet again:

http://www.snopes.com/pizzagate-conspiracy/

http://archive.is/vT47B

Alefantis also said many of the photographs were of children of family and friends, not patrons of Comet Ping Pong

And while rumors about pedophilia and child trafficking remain standard in urban folklore, roughly 90 percent of assaults on children in the U.S. are committed by a friend or family member

Both quotes from the same Snopes article.

AdamSKestle

Tooootally objective guys. Believe and submit.

Godwillwin

Wow! So porn stars and escorts get to decide what is real and what is fake. We are in more trouble than I thought, folks.....mote trouble than I thought SMH

SheSaidDestroy

Snopes "fact checked" the notion that putting pedophile symbols on children's merchandise is harmful to children. Snopes found that this notion was false, and that putting pedophile symbols on children's merchandise is not harmful to children.

http://www.snopes.com/code-for-pedophiles-on-toys/

http://archive.is/PZF5F

So rest assured parents, you can count on Snopes to think for you when it comes to what is best for your children. You officially have the green light from Snopes to put pedophile symbols on your children's belongings in order to teach them to associate pedophile symbols with fun, toys, games and more.

whorsquini

Snopes paraphrases "pedophiles" preferences to "adults" preferences when self-quoting

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1472778

SheSaidDestroy

Snopes feigns retardation in order to red herring people away from logical thought.

"(As we have noted in the past, fear of "pedophile code" imagery is occasionally the basis for panic, but law enforcement officials believed that the symbols themselves are used among adults to signal preferences, not as labels for children, not as markers placing them in any danger.)"

That point from them is completely irrelevant. Putting the symbols on child merchandise is meant to get children to associate the symbols with toys, games and general fun. It is meant to create a positive association with the symbols in the child's mind. It is self-explanatory how this is ultimately harmful/dangerous for children. It is also a way for pedophiles who work with children to signal each other subtly. For example, if someone saw that stuffed toy truck in a daycare center, most people would think nothing of it. But a pedophile would be able to recognize it and begin testing the daycare workers/owner further to see if there was a predatory opportunity going on. The daycare owner could also then claim ignorance and act shocked if someone pointed it out, plausible deniability that would not be possible if they had put up specific artwork of the symbols and so on. And of course any pedophiles who see the merchandise can then purchase it for that reason.

Snopes also lies so blatantly that the readers would have to completely retarded not to realize it.

The symbol on the plush monster truck was similar:

No it is an EXACT MATCH which the readers can see staring them in the face with the images right there.

It was also similar to the logo of popular surf brand Roxy, which features a large line of clothing for young children and tweens

No, the Roxy heart looks nothing like it which again, readers can see for themselves in the article. It is staring them in the face.

How in the world could anyone be so retarded as to look at that STARING THEM IN THE FACE and nod in agreement? Really?

derram

https://archive.is/zv48k :

Facebook 'fact checker' who will arbitrate on 'fake news' is accused of defrauding website to pay for prostitutes - and its staff includes an escort-porn star and 'Vice Vixen domme' | Daily Mail Online

'While David Mikkelson has denied that Snopes takes any political position, his new wife has a background in politics. ', "Barbara Mikkelson said: 'No comment. 'In court records, Barbara alleged that her ex-husband removed thousands from their business accounts between April and June of 2016 to pay for trips for him and his 'girlfriend'.", "In the time since the couple split, David has run the company's day-to-day operations, and authored a number of 'fact checks'."

'The couple had met in the early 1990s on a folklore-themed online message board, and married before setting up the site. ', "He has since remarried, to a former escort and porn actress who is one of the site's staff members."

This has been an automated message.