( pizzagate )

submitted by [deleted]

SpontaneousSpectator

I would recommend starting with millennial_falcons executive summary.

Sentastixc

Maybe you should also research 9/11 then.

UglyTruth

As a skeptic, what do you think the best rational, evidence-based argument is for the New York Times' position that PizzGate is an "insane, fabricated conspiracy theory"?

If you don't have any such evidence, then how do you explain why the NYT would say write such a thing?

TruthTrumps

I must say...this is an absolutely EXCELLENT article. Wow!

TruthTrumps

What, you want to be spoonfed? The information is here, on YouTube, Twitter and numerous other sites. Dig in and research. Do your own homework...like we all have.

SleepingCaterpillar

True, but I do think it's good for us to help as much as possible.. OP I just made this graphic recently of the besta pizza logo http://imgur.com/a/mhhS9 Now to suggest that this shouldn't at least be looked into should be your first red flag. 4 confirmed pedophile logos were found on the same street. I mean I believe in coincidences, but come on. But as you dig deeper and deeper, you find that this scandal is being censored on EVERY SINGLE PLATFORM. If it were false, why would censorship be required? It seems a lot of people literally won't believe it until they see a picture of a child being fucked. But none of us investigating want to go that far...

SheSaidDestroy

I would rather recruit you, as a constructive skeptic. Someone who can go through the stuff that is getting upvoted, and in a respectful, logical and methodical manner debunk where you can. Help us avoid echo chamber problems, help us prune the weak or bad evidence.

Bring a skeptic isn't bad. Those of us who are convinced that there is some nefarious shit involving children in D.C. and elsewhere in the government, by default makes us skeptical (to put it lightly) of what the MSM and government would say otherwise. We are all skeptics here, in one way or another.

It's not our job to hold your hand and post novels of info in a special thread just for you, and for any other lazy person who comes here making a thread like this, when you can browse the compilations for yourself and think for yourself.

But if you are a skeptic who is able to be respectful, logical and methodical, at least some of us would love to have you here.