AgainstPedos

A new thread has already been started on the following video but I think it's relevant here as well:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4BMV8fFfN4

stickittotheman

NYT are proven pedo protectors.

tehthu

On twitter (can't find the tweet or remember who it was), but a person claiming to be a NYT reporter said that all AP stories 'go away' after two weeks or something. I noted it mentally, but didn't dig deeper.

Would love to confirm or deny that element of this thread.

jonnythaiwongy9

Great post, while Slim owns it and pushes the agenda, he needs pawns willing to execute, the question is who would be willing to do such immoral things, and why? Are they in on it, or vulnerable to blackmail?

LaDonnaRae

You missed the CEO, Mark Thompson. He is the one who, while working for the BBC, covered up the Hampstead ring.

DarkMath

He covered up the Jimmy Savile affair not the Hempstead Ring which was mostly likely a hoax. ;-)

LaDonnaRae

Wrong. You could be right about Savile, but you are wrong about it being a hoax. But thank you for playing.

DarkMath

Have you really looked into the Hempstead Ring? The mother and her boyfriend fled the country and wouldn't show up for their court appearance. That's a red flag. If you thought your kids were being sexually abused you'd do anything to protect them including going to court. You'd want to scream it from the mountain tops that kids were being abused. You won't flee the country. ;-)

LaDonnaRae

Sickeningly, many of these "parents" are in on this twisted shit.

militant

There was nothing unusual with the deletion of that article, though.

According to the senior editor of standards at The New York Times, some AP wire stories are only live on their site for 24 hours. They basically have a running feed of AP stories on the site that editors rarely pay attention to and are cycled out without being archived.

When an AP article on The Times has “aponline” in the URL(like it does in the Norway piece), it is not archived on their websites.

ABC News and The Washington Post have not returned a request for comment by publication time, but they most likely have similar unsexy answers to the deletion.

https://heatst.com/politics/deleted-article-about-a-norwegian-pedophile-ring-ignites-conspiracy-theories/

2impendingdoom

there is a thread showing that this is a crap answer. Also NYT was involved in propaganda for the Iraq war with "reporter" Judith Miller who was admitted to writing fake stories. This was a big deal at the time. They lost all credibility with me for that debacle.

militant

It's not about NYT, WaPo nor ABC, it's about us claiming that there is some sort of shameful censorship behind the deletion of these articles, whereas there is nothing unusual with the deletion of AP wire stories.

Catsfive

I used to work at one of these three-letter online news agencies, and, just to be clear, the sites above license the "breaking" news content so that people can just get all their "global" news in one place. The contract stipulates that the AP content has to be removed after a negotiated period of time. Back when we marked up these stories by hand, we'd have to put special AP comments in the markup so that the maintenance bot could remove the stories before they are offlined into the slower news archive servers.

Orange_Circle

All the pedophile cover-up roads lead to Rome.

dindonufin

behind the walls of the vatican

Jeremy20_9

It does seem that way, doesn't it?

Once this reached the highest levels of government(s), it's not unreasonable to assume it spread through the power networks like a virus, and the longer it went undiscovered, the more entrenched it became.

These are like we'll traveled roads now.

Maybe that's the reason why elites seem so brazen about it (see Miley Cyrus), they've got away with it for so long they've forgotten the seething hatred we have for it.

ThePuppetShow

Nice work. Have some upvoats.

salinaslayer

Another pawn identified, great work

party1981

You don't even have to get that specific.

Carlos Slim bought the New York Times (most of it, or a lot of it).

He also donated millions and millions of dollars to the Clinton Foundation.

Case closed.

Jeremy20_9

I agree that NYTimes is a completely compromised news source, but I do think it's valuable to note the key players shutting down stories.

When Dean Baquet came to the times he already had a reputation as "subservient to intelligence community" as Glenn Greenwald put it, he displaced a popular Executive Editor Jill Abramson, and the timing was pretty good for Hillary, wouldn't you say?

party1981

I'm not disagreeing with you. I'm just pointing out that you can just look at to Carlos Slim and the CF to see the corruption. You are adding more detail.

LostandFound

Here's info on how he displaced her kinda https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/127433 he scores a few times on wikileaks

LostandFound

That's very true and you have a solid point. Still think looking into how this works is important. People like slim and guistra don't get their hands dirty anymore but people trying to make a mark they do, those are the people who will make mistakes.

LostandFound

Thank you! the NYT has been on some heavy set detachment from reality. I wondered how you would totally cuck an entire publication like that. Time to dig on this guy.

Trs0817

Cuck is normally used when someone/thing is usually viewed as conservative. The NYT already has no standards so its pretty typically behavior.

Sentastixc

Definitely a person of interest. Good work.