wellington33

People have to take the streets, without funders, without money, just with self-provided organization.

salinaslayer

Pizzagate is in a deadlock, but relax, the Wikileaks files will become public sometime soon.

spidersinwinter

I'll help in whatever way I can. I've already burnt half a dozen Twitter accounts just spreading the word, and I'm not above doing it more.

I'm no investigator (no time, no resources), but Twitter is free and so is Gab.

PlZZAGATE

I understand your point though you basically pointed out yourself that they'll frame us no matter what we do. I am willing to meet your position half way. I don't want to incriminate or drag down the major source of Pizzagate research but I also want to ensure the right information gets out there. I wouldn't mind setting these subs to private once sufficiently set up. It would allow operations to proceed without allowing shills to scapegoat easily.

redditsuckz

Tier 1.5: Internet personalities, not quite celebrities but not just grassroots journalists. 'Internet famous'. This is where I'd put guys like Stefan Molyneux who has brought up Pizzagate. People with verified accounts on social media, huge followings (in his case 100k+), and are down to drop truth bombs.

Tier 2: Grassroots journalists on social media. On the higher end we have Mike Cernovich and Paul Joseph Watson. Moving down we have David Seaman, Brittany Pettibone and a cadre of others with decent audiences. I have the ears of Brittany and David (through her) and both approve of this project and will take part. Brittany was also kind enough to provide a dozen names we should also work with. https://sli.mg/b1QZSH She follows me on Twitter and Gab now. https://sli.mg/JEHNF7 We need to network.

https://voat.co/v/PizzagatePhase2/1511745

You want to contact and work with all the shills?...all those people you named are "controlled opposition"...so either you know that and are trying to split this thing up or you dont know and are being useful to them either way...

PlZZAGATE

Having spoken to Britt I think she's completely authentic and I trust her. Seaman and the others as far as I'm concerned they're a means to spread information. We can't spread our message if we accuse everyone of being a shill including those on our side.

MillennialHarvestMes

Might I ask, are these new sub-voats going to be specific to a certain aspect of the research? I ask because, in my opinion, though I do okay in a "scattergram" approach to research, I don't think most people do, and having the main sub being a sort-of "shotgun" free-for-all, diffuses the focus and makes it hard to stay on target. Have we considered the possibility of forcing all "DC" related investigations to one page; Child Trafficking and CP in general to another, etc.? This might help consolidate the findings and allow each person to focus their attention on one area.

PlZZAGATE

PP2 will basically focus on spreading information through proxies and PP3 will basically involve joke warfare.

I don't disagree with compartmentalizing categories of research. In the military we divide our battalions by numerical shops. 1 for administration, 4 for supply, etc. It's a shame the Voat system doesn't allow for multiple stickies because it'd be useful in keeping track of specific topics.