And youtube, much like voat, much like many other sites will do
NOTHING
to stop it.
This type shit isn't remotely new, I remember finding several "Pre-Teen Model" sites all over the open internet years and years ago.... All the photos were provocative, sexually suggestive, more so than these video, and although I don't care to search them out again, and although it's not the same pre-teens, put "Pre Teen Model" in google or any other search engine and see what happens...
Wait here
, some years back there were a bunch of pre-teen model sites laid out like wanna-be celebrity porn stars sites, and being virtually as provocative.
None of this shit is new, and nobody {outside of non existent Decent Parents} can stop it, though I'd love to see someone prove me wrong.
Not a fan of these videos, didn't know they existed before just a little bit ago............
1 thing though, there is a phenomenon known as "trolling", maybe you've heard of it? Although we mostly all feel the comments are sick, the videos really shouldn't exist on youtube... It doesn't mean every asshole, obnoxious, sarcastic, derogatory comment is necessarily an actual child predator, certainly a good amount of them are just really tasteless trolls.
And are they going anywhere, probably not, for the same reasons
v/voatpingpong
&
v/loli
aren't going anywhere, someone will cry "free-speech", images will somehow magically become "speech", and since no actual genitalia or nipples are being shown....
It's pre-teens in panties, pretty sick, but by the same token you could say the same girls on the beach in little swimsuits that fit real similar is "sick" too, and that should be banned as certainly there are predators on the beach scoping that out too....
Good it is exposed also that youtube has areas of content that requires login, thare is surely a lot to check, what material is there what frequentations are there, what is the lingo the innuendos.
Age verification over the internet doesnt mean anythingis an illusion.
God a cat lady. It's called a subverse (short for subversive) on voat, not a subreddit on voat- you asshole. Other than the cat in the back ground, her whimpering bitch voice, and fucking up he names of subverses- it was a good video.
TV presenters and comedians in shows make jokes about porn internet pornstars, even at prime time. Pornstars are made as important as Cleopatra. Look how many of them became exploited because of drug addictions and got diseeased or died? The MSM dont ever show this side of the coin.
All media like a big tumbler drier has innunendo, they are creating a porn planet. Obviously in this vortex thery can confound and mislead. Just look at the eyes of this children in fornt of the cameras, there is something worring there. Thery are getting dehuminized by the tech and with the over stimulation.
BTW this shows how far the investigation goes, it goes to what we think is culture, behaviour, and what well public personality fosters and promote the deviation into the people mind. Many TV people and actors are involved with, sex and power addiction, and slavery.
Young models think they can became somebody, look how they end up with their Imprearios they are avilable to do anything for money. Follow the money as always.
Have you guys ever stumbled upon those kid channels, where the channel owners open up presents or they role-play as spiderman getting butt injections and so on. Its nonsense but intended for lil kids and some of them have millions of subscribers. Go watch them and look at the comment section: maybe its just me but it seems like some of them are using code language. I thought this fits to this topic and if its just me cause my computer doesn't have the fonts and translates to me in gibberish Im sorry. But I haven't seen those kind of comments anywhere else but those kid channels and they are in almost every video noticeable!
A lot of this appears to simply be people making money off of legal but very suggestive videos of teens or kids. Not really illegal as much as just disgusting. I think mostly it's a distraction really....
The thing is the videos are not illegal in any way. Sure the screenshots all seem to be suggestive but they are just innocent videos of kids most of which shot the videos them selves. Now it could be that someone is making money off of them, but all and all there is nothing illegal in the videos except maybe the kids don't know they're being shared or looked at. But again all of the videos are legit normal just kids playing. I think whoever posted them tried intentionally to make it look like there is more to it than that, and maybe that's the idea, but again there is nothing illegal that I have seen...
Disagree. I'll bet most of these children have been trafficked. They're 1st photographed in soft core poses for sale to one distributor, and then forced into doing much more vile sexual acts. The 1st buyer posts them on the internet in a way to make it seem like they were posted by different adults. Then he hires a shill to entice viewers by pretending to be a young child answering all of the raunchy posts. This encourages more hits and views. It would be hard to prosecute if the main poster lives in a foreign country where pedo laws are lax.
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO. Tried to start a new thread with the following video. I think it relates to this subject matter. Apologies to OP if it's wrong & you're welcome to move it to a better place if necessary.
Norway pedo ring was exposed by FBI as it has links to the Clinton's. Explains why MSM tried to cover it up. This is why these soft porn pics of little kids is so harmful. Watch the video to see what's really offered to the sickos.
I have no idea if it will do any good but I just sent an e-mail to several NEWS stations with 20 links with the most sexualized channels and comments.. lets see if anyone cares in "The so-called real NEWS"
I think that as many of you as can send it to at Least FOX see if the respond if any of the regular media might care it may be them, I did NOT meantion pizzagate.
Email: Send a message to
[email protected]
Email the Newsroom:
[email protected]
Twitter: "Tweet" at our main
@foxnews
account
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews
AT least give it a shot.
It may not be trafficking but if someone is making money off this , that is wrong and may be illegal,, none the less I think this shit should be in the news.
I've often wondered how many locked/private/hidden subs are on reddit. Last week, they banned
r/pedofriends
but that ban may only have been for show. It would be easy enough to create another r/ and it wouldn't even have to be locked. If the name was something innocuous like
r/whiteandbluepepper
or
r/slippersonfire
who would know the difference? This would be true, especially of the admins are participating themselves or looking the other way. The people at the top of huge companies are often part of the problem not the solutions. That why they're put in those positions. Psychopaths seem to be running everything in this country. "Snakes in Suits" is a great book on that very topic.
i will make this very easy to understand. video type A has people who support it and advocate for being quiet and not making a fuss. video type B advocates for making a fuss and interfering with other people's lives. i'll let you guess at which one of those is the real problem.
I follow the perverted commentators on several of the channels and it seems they collect and sub these kind of channels specifically . Tjhis has to be this underground type of thing. like the pedo channles I had posted about before.
Its becoming more and more clear that bringing them down would bring down most if not all major establishments in the western world political or otherwise.
Kinda off topic but what are we gonna do after the hangman is paid?
Wow, Grace seems emotionally affected in this video. It's hard to ignore the blatant sexual exploitation of children is right out in the open for all to see.
That's just not why people are concerned. Look at the comments and the absurd number of views! Clearly they are sexualizing and exploiting the children. It's softcore, entry level, "safe" non nude voyeuristic fap material for pedos. The "ring" is the people commenting, sharing, and making playlists out of this content.
The "human trafficking" element is not the concern. It's the sexual exploitation of children.
The main relevance to Pizzagate here is the obvious hypocrisy of YouTube taking down Pizzagate videos (calling them "adult content") while
allowing blatant pedophilia channels
. It's similar to Reddit's ban of
/r/pizzagate
while ignoring
/r/pedofriends
and the like.
Grace says in the video you need to submit ID and social security numbers to get a monetised channel. Some of them are. I can't stomach checking them all. I checked a few yesterday and some of the videos with millions of views have monetisation.
That would leave a few options;
The child applied for it, very unlikely and possibly not even possible (I'm not sure if there's a minimum age)
The parent applied for it
Someone else applied for it and uses videos from what could be dubious sources
I've seen some people say these videos are automatically named/uploaded but that doesn't explain the monetisation on some of them.
That does make it very fishy, I certainly don't believe those videos were monetized by a parent, (or at least a sane parent that cares for their child) and I have monetized videos before on youtube so I know you have to be 18+. Almost seems like dark web material, but as far as I'm aware you can't get ad revenue services like google adsense on the dark web, which would explain why this would be on youtube.. Sickening to think this can get on youtube. I am flagging every single one rn
▼ equineluvr
That, and they accuse their opponent of what THEY are guilty of. It's their favorite tactic!!
▼ Runaway-White-Slave
And youtube, much like voat, much like many other sites will do NOTHING to stop it.
This type shit isn't remotely new, I remember finding several "Pre-Teen Model" sites all over the open internet years and years ago.... All the photos were provocative, sexually suggestive, more so than these video, and although I don't care to search them out again, and although it's not the same pre-teens, put "Pre Teen Model" in google or any other search engine and see what happens... Wait here , some years back there were a bunch of pre-teen model sites laid out like wanna-be celebrity porn stars sites, and being virtually as provocative.
None of this shit is new, and nobody {outside of non existent Decent Parents} can stop it, though I'd love to see someone prove me wrong.
▼ Runaway-White-Slave
Not a fan of these videos, didn't know they existed before just a little bit ago............
1 thing though, there is a phenomenon known as "trolling", maybe you've heard of it? Although we mostly all feel the comments are sick, the videos really shouldn't exist on youtube... It doesn't mean every asshole, obnoxious, sarcastic, derogatory comment is necessarily an actual child predator, certainly a good amount of them are just really tasteless trolls.
And are they going anywhere, probably not, for the same reasons v/voatpingpong & v/loli aren't going anywhere, someone will cry "free-speech", images will somehow magically become "speech", and since no actual genitalia or nipples are being shown....
It's pre-teens in panties, pretty sick, but by the same token you could say the same girls on the beach in little swimsuits that fit real similar is "sick" too, and that should be banned as certainly there are predators on the beach scoping that out too....
▼ APC_Frankfurt
Good it is exposed also that youtube has areas of content that requires login, thare is surely a lot to check, what material is there what frequentations are there, what is the lingo the innuendos. Age verification over the internet doesnt mean anythingis an illusion.
▼ goatboy
God a cat lady. It's called a subverse (short for subversive) on voat, not a subreddit on voat- you asshole. Other than the cat in the back ground, her whimpering bitch voice, and fucking up he names of subverses- it was a good video.
▼ lump
Maybe there's worse stuff unlisted or private. If you can find it.
▼ APC_Frankfurt
TV presenters and comedians in shows make jokes about porn internet pornstars, even at prime time. Pornstars are made as important as Cleopatra. Look how many of them became exploited because of drug addictions and got diseeased or died? The MSM dont ever show this side of the coin.
All media like a big tumbler drier has innunendo, they are creating a porn planet. Obviously in this vortex thery can confound and mislead. Just look at the eyes of this children in fornt of the cameras, there is something worring there. Thery are getting dehuminized by the tech and with the over stimulation.
BTW this shows how far the investigation goes, it goes to what we think is culture, behaviour, and what well public personality fosters and promote the deviation into the people mind. Many TV people and actors are involved with, sex and power addiction, and slavery. Young models think they can became somebody, look how they end up with their Imprearios they are avilable to do anything for money. Follow the money as always.
▼ Aasb
Have you guys ever stumbled upon those kid channels, where the channel owners open up presents or they role-play as spiderman getting butt injections and so on. Its nonsense but intended for lil kids and some of them have millions of subscribers. Go watch them and look at the comment section: maybe its just me but it seems like some of them are using code language. I thought this fits to this topic and if its just me cause my computer doesn't have the fonts and translates to me in gibberish Im sorry. But I haven't seen those kind of comments anywhere else but those kid channels and they are in almost every video noticeable!
▼ jbooba
5 Downvotes. Well we have at least 5 paedophiles here.
▼ Fateswebb
A lot of this appears to simply be people making money off of legal but very suggestive videos of teens or kids. Not really illegal as much as just disgusting. I think mostly it's a distraction really....
▼ Fateswebb
The thing is the videos are not illegal in any way. Sure the screenshots all seem to be suggestive but they are just innocent videos of kids most of which shot the videos them selves. Now it could be that someone is making money off of them, but all and all there is nothing illegal in the videos except maybe the kids don't know they're being shared or looked at. But again all of the videos are legit normal just kids playing. I think whoever posted them tried intentionally to make it look like there is more to it than that, and maybe that's the idea, but again there is nothing illegal that I have seen...
▼ AgainstPedos
Disagree. I'll bet most of these children have been trafficked. They're 1st photographed in soft core poses for sale to one distributor, and then forced into doing much more vile sexual acts. The 1st buyer posts them on the internet in a way to make it seem like they were posted by different adults. Then he hires a shill to entice viewers by pretending to be a young child answering all of the raunchy posts. This encourages more hits and views. It would be hard to prosecute if the main poster lives in a foreign country where pedo laws are lax.
▼ AgainstPedos
PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO. Tried to start a new thread with the following video. I think it relates to this subject matter. Apologies to OP if it's wrong & you're welcome to move it to a better place if necessary.
Norway pedo ring was exposed by FBI as it has links to the Clinton's. Explains why MSM tried to cover it up. This is why these soft porn pics of little kids is so harmful. Watch the video to see what's really offered to the sickos.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a4BMV8fFfN4
▼ Chance903
I have no idea if it will do any good but I just sent an e-mail to several NEWS stations with 20 links with the most sexualized channels and comments.. lets see if anyone cares in "The so-called real NEWS"
I think that as many of you as can send it to at Least FOX see if the respond if any of the regular media might care it may be them, I did NOT meantion pizzagate. Email: Send a message to [email protected] Email the Newsroom: [email protected] Twitter: "Tweet" at our main @foxnews account Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FoxNews AT least give it a shot.
▼ RamblinRambo
Google seems to definitely be hiding this shit in the open. From /pol/:
https://i.sli.mg/VYVwSX.png
This is some crazy ass disturbing shit.
▼ Chance903
It may not be trafficking but if someone is making money off this , that is wrong and may be illegal,, none the less I think this shit should be in the news.
▼ Lopsid
cracked me up. She's totally a redditor.
▼ IncompetentRedditMod
Pizzagate was never simply about a pizzashop, that was msm lies in an attempted cover-up/disinfo campaign
▼ EndIsComing
I recommend taking a look at accounts like SevenSuperGirls, which have always struck me as odd and worthy of investigation.
▼ markrod420
check out reddits r/webcamvideo . it is a private subreddit that i think is likely connected to this.
they say people should search "Webcam Video from" and a date, in the description of the subreddit.
▼ Chance903
Who is "They"?
▼ markrod420
The description of the private subreddit contains that wording.
▼ zzvoat
I've often wondered how many locked/private/hidden subs are on reddit. Last week, they banned r/pedofriends but that ban may only have been for show. It would be easy enough to create another r/ and it wouldn't even have to be locked. If the name was something innocuous like r/whiteandbluepepper or r/slippersonfire who would know the difference? This would be true, especially of the admins are participating themselves or looking the other way. The people at the top of huge companies are often part of the problem not the solutions. That why they're put in those positions. Psychopaths seem to be running everything in this country. "Snakes in Suits" is a great book on that very topic.
▼ markrod420
I want to infiltrate that sub but I have no clue how and I don't want to tip them off to our suspicion just by messaging them asking for entry
▼ greycloud
i will make this very easy to understand. video type A has people who support it and advocate for being quiet and not making a fuss. video type B advocates for making a fuss and interfering with other people's lives. i'll let you guess at which one of those is the real problem.
▼ Kikimc22
What the hell is going on here (the YouTube channel). This is terrifying, I couldn't bring myself to watch, the thumbnails are disturbing
▼ Chance903
I follow the perverted commentators on several of the channels and it seems they collect and sub these kind of channels specifically . Tjhis has to be this underground type of thing. like the pedo channles I had posted about before.
▼ markrod420
Oh wow. That's really fucked up.
Also, seriously don't search for "webcam video from" on YouTube unless you want to get slapped in the face with a bunch of almost child porn.
▼ The_Invincible_Moose
Can we get this trending?
https://mobile.twitter.com/hashtag/YouTubePedos?src=hash
▼ SlackeryTurnBull
I'm a bit triggered when she raises her arm and there's an upside down star on her sleeve. But I guess I'm sensitive.
▼ sonicafternoon
Its becoming more and more clear that bringing them down would bring down most if not all major establishments in the western world political or otherwise. Kinda off topic but what are we gonna do after the hangman is paid?
▼ markrod420
Considering how many people he is gonna have to hang, I think paying the hangman is gonna be expensive and will likely take quite some time.
▼ starseedlover
Wow, Grace seems emotionally affected in this video. It's hard to ignore the blatant sexual exploitation of children is right out in the open for all to see.
▼ Chance903
If there parenst know is this a form of prostitution if the channel is making money?
▼ starseedlover
That's just not why people are concerned. Look at the comments and the absurd number of views! Clearly they are sexualizing and exploiting the children. It's softcore, entry level, "safe" non nude voyeuristic fap material for pedos. The "ring" is the people commenting, sharing, and making playlists out of this content.
The "human trafficking" element is not the concern. It's the sexual exploitation of children.
▼ Chance903
IF ANYONE does not have a problem with this , I have a problem with them. This is inexcusable sexual exploitation .
▼ angry_mob
thank u - this^^^
▼ ThePuppetShow
Some chomo blew up the other thread. https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1513181
Look what this tool told me. I'm pretty heated.
http://sli.mg/aCR6Ru.png
▼ Chance903
Well obviously he is a pedophile
▼ Millennial_Falcon
The main relevance to Pizzagate here is the obvious hypocrisy of YouTube taking down Pizzagate videos (calling them "adult content") while allowing blatant pedophilia channels . It's similar to Reddit's ban of /r/pizzagate while ignoring /r/pedofriends and the like.
▼ golly
How odd, another thread about this got flagged as debunked by the mods. What exactly was debunked? Or was it tagged debunked by mistake?
▼ SleepingCaterpillar
I noticed that too, I didn't really understand the webcam case though. why are kids uploading videos of themselves? Or is their a further theory?
▼ golly
Grace says in the video you need to submit ID and social security numbers to get a monetised channel. Some of them are. I can't stomach checking them all. I checked a few yesterday and some of the videos with millions of views have monetisation.
That would leave a few options;
I've seen some people say these videos are automatically named/uploaded but that doesn't explain the monetisation on some of them.
▼ SleepingCaterpillar
appreciate the response.
That does make it very fishy, I certainly don't believe those videos were monetized by a parent, (or at least a sane parent that cares for their child) and I have monetized videos before on youtube so I know you have to be 18+. Almost seems like dark web material, but as far as I'm aware you can't get ad revenue services like google adsense on the dark web, which would explain why this would be on youtube.. Sickening to think this can get on youtube. I am flagging every single one rn
▼ TheKFCNyanCat
I don't know why I questioned the legitimacy of these claims when they were first posted here, the thumbnails said it all.
▼ Davecross
Jesus.... Now it's real