Man I am only trying to enforce the subverse rules. Whatever other dissonance there is between us I think we can both agree that keeping the discussion posts on topic as outlined by those few rules is a solid decision.

I'm not sure who Atif Colo is but if it helps you by all means. I look forward to your remade post as I am not certain what information I would need to add to make it relevant.
Cheers :)

Basically I need you to do a bit of handholding here as I've read through the associated documents and your post regardless of its readability.
No where in your post title do you state how this is related to pizzagate. which is fine in and of itself but in the body that you have provided as a comment instead of in a discussion post you have also failed to provide evidence of how it's related to pizzagate. The article and study in question are in fact about sexual exploitation in the united states and offer statistics regarding the exploitation of children. These statistics are great points of information and interest however as posed they do not offer us any insight on who to look at where to look and how the information is relevant to our investigation in its current form. I think there needs to be another piece of information here, with this as a support to make this article relevant. Unless I'm missing something glaringly obvious.
In addition I apologize that I made an offending statement regarding your mental health and acuity however I do recommend that in the future you attempt to address the idea you're attempting to convey in as concise a manner as possible. The information could be good but if it's thrown amongst a bunch of appeals to emotion and exclamations of personal feeling it pulls away from its credibility. Make your case by telling us what you want to know and then let us make the decision. If the information is solid it will hold itself up.
I also recommend you take a read over these two things
http://www.wikihow.com/Write-a-Research-Paper
http://www.wikihow.com/Write-a-Persuasive-Essay

Solid point I will refrain from doing so in the future.

I do not understand what you mean by ghosted :/

Basically they are just asking you to follow the rules which are in the side bar. More specifically the ones requesting that you attempt to explain how you think your post is relevant to the investigation. Cheers I hope you revise and attempt to continue to contribute. I will be removing this post now.

This one is bound to get deleted as well man you didn't listen to a word that was said.
No one know what th hell you're trying to say here and you honestly come off as someone who is off their meds.
I am linking an archive of the pdf because it may actually hold some information.
https://archive.is/cwWGZ <-- archive of purdue pdf so no one has to actually open the damn pdf
it doesn't it does talk about commonality of specific types of sexual abuse but doesn't address any specifics.