Removing due to rule #3.

If you believe your content can further the investigation, please resubmit specifically pointing out how, and resort on objective facts rather than sensationalist titles. In particular, it's been known for a long time that the e-fits match the Podestas, and the community understands the significance of that. What would further the investigation is more damning evidence that they were responsible for the abduction. Thank you.

The witnesses didn't get a good look at the suspect: the efits could have been the result of a parallel investigation or a fit-up. From Richard D Hall's documentary "The Phantoms" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dL0-ePd3FCU efits discussed from 2:17:00

The Madeline Mccan suspects match the Podestas too much, and it makes sense that they were "unable to press charges" if they are high power politicians. There's no other pair of suspects other than the Podestas, who have enough authority to shut the police down. It's insane how people can't pick this up. It doesn't matter about the vague statements of "possibly one person", etc. because it's clearly not a coincidence.

These efits helped us uncover the true crimes of the Podestas. Really, people who can actually dismiss this coincidence are no longer worth anything imo. They're so fucking asleep, it's incredible.

To my knowledge this was never confirmed. Instead the police only said they "think" or "believe" it is two different descriptions of one person.

Example: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/oct/14/british-detectives-efits-madeleine-mccann-suspect

http://archive.is/RiOQv

Police have issued two efits that they believe are descriptions of the same man, who is now being sought as a priority by the British detectives leading the new McCann inquiry.

that they believe are descriptions of the same man

Even the freckle was included, albeit opposing sides: http://i.imgur.com/SbhJmLd.png

I'll say that if it's not them, then it's one hell of a psyop that has been in the works for years.