I provided the proof that Wikipedia wanted and they once again deleted my comments off the talk page ( pizzagate )

submitted by SChalice

This is relevant because there is a very concerted effort by Wikipedia to silence pizzagaters. I will probably be banned for my posts as they have already threatened. Wikipedia says the DC police have investigated and subsequently debunked pizzagate. It turns out they never investigated.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omlQHWrgmd4&t=1s

Someone was asking for a reliable source for this information. I found the address and phone number of the policeman that wrote the letter confirming that DC metro never investigated Comet Ping Pong. 

Donald Kaufman
Metropolitan Police Department
300 Indiana Avenue, NW
Room 4153
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone: (202) 727-3721

WIKIPEDIA DELETED IT ALL OF COURSE! on a talk page, lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory&action=history

asdfghjkl123456789

Thank you for your work in The Labyrinth to try to keep truth alive.

hashtaggery

Might as well add Wikipedia to the PPM (Pro-Pedophilia Media) Wikipedia page. I wonder how many monitoring / editorial jobs Pizzagate has created. I think I'll research open positions with PPM to see what sort of impact we are having.

redberries

Speaking of verifiable sources, I had a skim through the Wikipedia page and this is what it said:

Questionable sources are those that have a poor reputation for checking the facts, lack meaningful editorial oversight, or have an apparent conflict of interest.[8]

Seems like all their sources have a direct conflict of interest to count as a credible source regarding the topic, don't you think?

yabbadoody

WikiPedia is a front organization for intelligence community, and CONSISTENTLY works to foster "social norms". Anything out of the norm, is very likely to receive censorship via WikiPedia. As a result, I WILL NEVER GIVE WIKIPEDIA even 5 cents of my money "to help them" ruin difficult or controversial topics. They're full of it, but if you WANT the "normative" take on something, or are looking into non-controversial topics, then hey...

pizzagater99

This needs more attention

Votescam

Wikipedia is suggesting that they're going under unless contributions increase. There seems to be a confusing method of funding Wikipedia which may be coming from a different source of funding than the public. And that's what this banning of "pizzagate" suggests, imo. Of course, elites/wealthy and large corporations -- so many of which are monopolies now -- are always a threat to free speech. They have the power to threaten and they definitely use it. It's Operation Mockingbird since two years before the end of WWII until now and it continues on.

Im_with_her

Pizzagate is fake news. The DC police investigated and found nothing. Anyone who claims they have proof that the police did not investigate are just spreading lies. Even Faux News debunked it. The world laughs at you sad individuals.

asdfghjkl123456789

If you're Correct the Record, I'm sorry for you. Join DOD or civilian intelligence and get paid more at least!

If you're at Eglin, or other military, I understand you're just doing your job. But use some of your time to find the actual truth. Then get out as soon as you can.

Realize they WILL lie to you, even giving you fake documents and sources to make you spread misinformation. This happened to William Cooper, even after he served his country admirably.

garlicbulb

debunking according to wikipedia http://sli.mg/mVHOEu

wisdomtooth

Keep pushing! (y)

SChalice

I wasn't asking for Wikipedia to change it based on my post (I would just make the edit myself). I was asking for true non-believers to do it if they really cared. Don't shoot the messenger.

gopluckyourself

inb4 Kaufman gets depressed and suicided

SChalice

Or they will say Kaufman is a rogue agent like what DHS said about the Georgia voter database hacks.

samhara

Wiki is gamed, no doubt. Thank g-d I didn't invest any time with them doing Free work, and then find out how they screw people. Also, they are begging for money. Please.. !

That *is a typical "Liberal" or Church scam.. Get everyone to do the work for free. Than charge for it and pocket the money.. And make sure you let everyone one know that you are a charity and they need to give to you or be a bad person. I gave so much money for "good causes" and then was back - stabbed.

SChalice

Proof is calling the Metro police department and asking for Donald, then asking him if his department investigated Comet Ping Pong. If I did it, you wouldn't believe me therefore YOU HAVE TO DO IT YOURSELF!

This is very simple and I am sorry you do not understand.

Votescam

An investigation without a final written report?

JastheMace

The only people who don't want actual proof are those involved in the cover up. Also, posting a phone number for a public police department is not violating any privacy rules anywhere.

Fatsack

So, Reddit, Facebook, Youtube, Wikipedia, Google, Craigslist, Twitter. Maybe we ought to start looking at Silicon Valley, seems like a HUGE hub of pedophilia.

asdfghjkl123456789

Craigslist seems to have kids. Facebook has grownups.

PresudentMcCheese

What is Wikipedia supposed to do with some guy's address? Have you ever seen any encyclopedia just print an address as a citation? You don't seem to know how citations work at all. This isn't a conspiracy--it's the other editors at Wikipedia knowing how things work and you being completely clueless.

SChalice

I was not completely clueless, I have been editing Wikipedia for a decade. I offered a real human policeman as proof. I believe the story and showing others the obvious proof was all I intended to accomplish.

fuckmyreddit

It will get on Wikipedia someday. I'm not a researcher but I have faith that good will overcome evil. The evidence seems convincing from what I've read, but this whole subject is volatile. The people you're dealing with may honestly think you're cracked. I've never published or edited on Wikipedia so I don't know. I'm just trying to be encouraging.

SChalice

Like I say I have, and the brutal reaction of Wiki mods is unlike any other editing problems I have had in the past. This has set off warning bells in my head.

GreyAlien

WIKIPEDIA IS CURROPTED TO THE CORE ANY FIGHT WITH THEM YOU GOTTA BRING THE BIG GUNS. GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE TOP

KittyTigerlily

Can someone here help me with something? There's someone called Mr Unknown, and he's posting all kinds of codes on his Twitter page. He's @techgigbit

I don't know who to ask or where to ask on here. Check him out when you get a chance.

samhara

I wouldn't touch that "with a ten ft. pole"

Horla2

Wikipedia is owned by Jews.

I don't know how you people haven't noticed a pattern with Jewish media yet

asdfghjkl123456789

Most of them are not actual Jews. Just like bin Ladin wasn't a Muslim.

fuckmyreddit

Wikipedia is owned by Jews? Oh fucking no. Those kikes are everywhere. Well I guess you should get off the internet because I see two or three Jew names on the list of people who invented ARPANET, the proto internet. Hands up you're surrounded. I guess those damn Hebes made it possible for you to track down potential pedos. No irony involved with using wiki as my source. Or is all of wiki jew lies? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET So just stop.

EDIT: Fucking Jewish engineer from MIT: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Kleinrock

EDIT: OH NO. Another https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Baran

EDIT: This one is suspicious. His father was a high school teacher in Brooklyn. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Kahn

I mean, I don't usually make a big deal about religion unless someone has a suicide vest, in which case I would probably yell Ala akbar and throw a net on him before trying to tackle him after confusing him. (I'm sure you wouldn't want me to try and save people because I'm just a short Jewish mother and probably not the most effective tackle.)

For the love of GOD,you're making these nice researchers look bad. Who's side are you on?

SChalice

Possibly the influx of bigots is either real or an attempt to make pizzagaters look like idiots. Either way, racism is here to stay.

fuckmyreddit

You're right. I find myself thinking the same way sometimes with people. I'm impressed by all the research people are doing for free. This whole MOVEMENT is amazing.

Fatsack

Alot of the media is owned by Saudi money too.

fuckmyreddit

This is not ABOUT JEWS AND MUSLIMS! Have you ever been to London? Do you people think the House of Commons and the House of Lords is all Jews and Muslims. Do you think the Catholic Church has Jewish priests? I don't know how many different ways to say this. It's like a running gag, except it doesn't have a laugh track and it's not funny. Jews are freaking neurotic overachievers. Their mothers make them that way. Trust me, all Jewish guys would like to smoke weed and become Beavis and Butt-Head in college but their mothers would be disappointed. 5his overachiever gene is why you see a lot of Jewish names. Hollywood may be different but don't have a cow everytime you see a Swartz or a Greenberg. All jews are pushed into potential prominence by their non-satanic mothers. Well my former mother in law could have a little satan in her, but not THIS kind.

EDIT:Media and Hollywood ARE owned by Jews. I think it's a carryover from 5he days of Vaudeville. But there ARE pedos from all religions. I hope I don't have to keep saying this. I'm not trying to put you down. I'm just trying to keep this investigation on a level of seriousness for newbies who are interested in reading your research.

Theupsidedown

Shut the fuck up.

abortionburger

Stop.

Antonius

Wikipedia is a bunch of shills...just like Reddit.

asdfghjkl123456789

It's run by about 1000 people, top editors and admins. You can write whatever you want about stuff they don't care about. But you can't cross them on certain subject.

The control is done by stifling. Slowly wear down your desire to make productive edits.

I've run into odd people who know the game, and are willing to play it at the margins. Look for those who try to increase the level of truth, but immediately back down when the cabal tells them to.

JastheMace

Yep, and all the MSM and at least half of the newly labeled 'alt-right'

golly

To get the FOIA request included on Wikipedia it needs to be confirmed by a source Wikipedia trusts. I'm not sure if they trust any sources outside of the liberal media, who coincidentally all colluded with the Clintons. I suggest contacting any of the sources they do trust and ask them to verify your FIOA request.

SChalice

Thank you for the honest reply as I was sitting here trying to figure out how to give them proof that they would accept. Not only do I have to get them to verify the request but I then have to get them to write a public article about it on the acceptable media platform.

All of this to disprove their false "statement of fact"...

golly

Even if you would somehow get a certificate or some proof you actually filed and received a response, Wikipedia can say you photoshopped it. I'm a Wikinoob, so I can't help you much other than trying to comply with the acceptable sources rule.

paulf

Please don't bother with Wikipedia. The editors have known pedos in their midst and the directors used to be pornographers. Go to Infogalactic instead.

asdfghjkl123456789

Agreed. The ones running Infogalactic want free speech. They have an agenda, but they are honest and I don't think it will bleed through.

SChalice

They claim that posting the DC metro police phone number was the reason for removing ALL of my posts. Without posting the phone number of the individual making claims, I am incapable of proving anything to Wikipedia. The game is rigged.

asdfghjkl123456789

Sorry to tell you that Wikipedia is under control. It's been that way as long as I can remember.

SChalice

Why would Wikipedia moderators be interested in covering up for pedophiles? It seems like a risky thing for their companies image.

If I was a criminal and I hear about other criminals of my kind being attacked, I would shut up and hide, not stand out and defend the people.

circ_is_a_sex_crime

They fuck with a lot of shit.

http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Jake_H._Waskett

samhara

How does this relate to "Pizzagate" - we must understand the Media landscape in order to be able to achieve our goals. If we are ignorant of the status quo, we will un-necessarily spin our wheels.

Wiki is no better than Snopes, on issues to do with large State Crimes. Or alt. Science. It's controlled. As I've mentioned on the Rules thread today. "Information Control is the top priority of the Modern Military"

James H. Fetzer – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia BUSTED! "Veteran's Today"- https://archive.is/draHI -

"Rupert, Wikipedia and Guerrilla Skeptics" - http://www.sheldrake.org/reactions/wikipedia - "Topics that spark Wikipedia 'edit wars'" revealed https://archive.is/wMLzO "Wikipedia We Have A Problem FAQ' https://archive.is/JP3zQ PSI Wars: TED, Wikipedia and the Battle for the Internet / Amazon book Censored / Banned Rupert Sheldrake / unreasonably using slur words but not data https://archive.is/YrYjE "Wikipedia Under Threat" https://archive.is/F9DL6 Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia - https://archive.is/w3WHH - They are trained on teams. Guerrilla Skepticism Training Video - Susan Gerbic - "Guerrilla Skepticism on Wikipedia" - JREF Workshop - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FuJT9mp0jw - They are trained in teams. Who's funding it?

militant

The whole point of Wikipedia is to manipulate normal people when it comes to 'touchy' subjects like pizzagate. I'm glad that people like you are still trying to fight there, but as you said yourself, the game is rigged.

asdfghjkl123456789

Who do you think runs wikipedia?