Anyone catch Tony and John Podesta discussing "Agency I" in emails? ( pizzagate )

submitted by spaceanon

Has anyone researched the significance (or lack of) John and Tony Podesta discussing Jacob Studley and Julien Studley?

If taken literally, the sequence is:

  1. "Julien Studley is very sick" and they discuss trying to help someone contact Jacob Studley. https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/56699

  2. In reply, John asks where is Jacob? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/27373

  3. to which Tony has two replies: (a) was in Beijing, then Pakistan, totally undercover https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/32338 , (b) then says "Agency I" https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/44261

Some simple internet research reveals Jacob is probably Julien's son, which explains why they would want to contact him if his dad is very sick. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julien_J._Studley

The open questions I have are:

  • what is the Podesta brothers relationship to Jacob and Julien Studley?

  • what agency are they referring to when mentioning Agency I?

It seems clear whatever agency Jacob is associated with that has him undercover around the globe (hmmm..) is also an agency that both Tony and John have a close relationship with.

Anyhow, it seemed important to document this since I could not find any mentions in this sub-verse

2impendingdoom

http://chronicle.uchicago.edu/981210/political.shtml Picture of Jacob as Student at U Chicago in 1998

2impendingdoom

What was happening in Beijing and/or Pakistan Dec. 2014?

yabbadoody

"I", "private eye (I)", = Intelligence. of whatever kind, could be business, political, social, marketing, crime, or "studies" for any/all of the same.

Intel. It's What's Inside.

Anyone have any search info for the two, with the "cutout" sounding last names? My guess is they don't show up anywhere legit, and just "pop out" of no where if they do... sort of like the Podestas and James Achilles Alefantis.

salinaslayer

A-gen-C-I, yeah it's code for the CIA

DarkMath

"what agency are they referring to when mentioning Agency I?"......I'd bet "Agency I" is the Central Intelligence Agency.

;-)

Wolftrail7272

We have spoken before and you seem like you know your stuff. So I'm curious why you mention the FED in StL. I know the building, but what is the significance here? Thanks!

EllaMinnow

He's caught my attention before as well. Is he suggesting we find $1s from stl and KC and track their previous locations? I tried with the only H $1 I have but it said it had no previous tracking history. I'll try a different route.

madmanpg

The "were you able to find anything" forward is particularly intriguing. Good find. I want to know what this "Agency I" is referring to and why Jacob was "undercover".

srayzie

Homosexual HRC Founder Terrence Patrick Bean Arrested for Rape of 15-Year-Old Boy https://archive.is/1aaK1

ronnyCPI

"Agency" almost always refers to the CIA-- Central Intelligence Agency.

StrangeHologram

My thoughts exactly. And Agency 1 or is it "I" as in "Intelligence"?

ronnyCPI

It's probably "I" as in intelligence, to differentiate it from "O" as in operations.

OrwellKnew

This is from a 2015 NYT obit / bio

After serving in the National Guard in a propaganda unit, he applied for a job with the Central Intelligence Agency, but was rejected. Another real estate firm, however, took him on.

The firm later fired him for breaking a rule — his biography did not elaborate on the incident — but he turned that setback into an opportunity. Acquiring a broker’s license, he started his own company from scratch, soliciting business at first from his apartment.

He is survived by his wife, Jane; his son, Jacob; his stepson, Ni Jun; and two step-grandsons.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/19/realestate/commercial/julien-studley-real-estate-broker-who-began-career-in-a-bedroom-dies-at-88.html

My take here is, he applied to the CIA and they officially "rejected" him but actually hired him on at one of their front groups. To read between the lines considering the emails you cite

His "firing" at the firm was likely just an attempt to create more distance between him and the Agency to maintain his covert work.

fartyshorts

My exact thoughts/interpretation.

2impendingdoom

I read the emails that the son Jacob is the one undercover... not Julien the father.

OrwellKnew

I'm arguing that they both are Agency assets

salinaslayer

so it's intergenerational? recipe for disaster, wow

2impendingdoom

Oh, that would make sense too.

derram

https://archive.is/b00z1 :

The Podesta brothers discuss an undercover Agent : WikiLeaks

This has been an automated message.

witch_doctor1

That is intriguing! Maybe Agency was a reference to CIA and I is short for intelligence? I mean, I have no freaking clue, but I agree that I love tidbits like this and will mentally file it away if it becomes relevant later. EDIT: How cool would it be to have Studley as a last name....I'd name my son Mofo, so that when he filled out gov't forms it would read Studley, Mofo....

umpteenth

+1 for mofo

Mrs_Ogynist01

Great find! Why does Tony Podesta have information on where undercover agents are located?

Verite1

To me, it would seem anyway, it would be because of all the CIA interaction with the Clinton foundation the revolving door, and how close the Podesta's are, insiders in Washington for so many years course they would have relationships, with CIA ppl.

throwawaa

Yup. And that's no doubt a violation of the law to share information about undercover agents with civilians.

Sentastixc

Great little unsolved piece of the puzzle. Too bad such details are not saved to some aggregating info thread and disappear of the radar after a few days.

EngelbertHumperdinck

We all have to do this ourselves. And repost whenever connections are made. In a case like this, with so many shills on the scene, centralizing the investigation leaves it more vulnerable to corruption.