Deleting per rule 1. These are likely jokes are not necessarily relevant. It certainly does not warrant the action you're advocating here. Bad idea to harass folks based on thin speculation.

No, that will just discredit the investigation. Those emails look way too much like jokes, the majority of people will roll their eyes and it will reinforce the idea that PG is based on nothing!

Terrible idea. Those emails are in no way solid proof and indeed appear to be tasteless jokes. You will lose this in the court of public opinion and come off looking illegitimate. This will make you look and PG look bad and accomplishes nothing positive. It's harassment and its' based on thin conjecture. Further, why do you feel that alerting some alleged bad person to their misdeeds is helping out? That's how accounts of interest go private, from enthusiastic half-cocked stalkers. BAD IDEA.