Sean Hannity interview with WikiLeaks' Julian Assange at 10:00 Eastern tonight ( pizzagate )

submitted by snr2snt2000

[Note to mods: Please excuse this seemingly off-topic post, as I realize it may not fit the criteria set forth by the mods, but since it involves WikiLeaks and Assange and is very timely I thought it may be allowed. Thank you for your consideration.]

Couple of possible stream links:

http://streamfare.com/fox_news_2.html

https://youtu.be/IyyV0r-tMIM

AgainstPedos

Entire video COULD have been faked with modern tech. Don't forget government intel is at least 10 years ahead of private industry in this regard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cmYmsE5WyU

postfascion

Yeah, and could of course be biding or Biden (cheep joke I know) his time to release more info. Will watch the video when not using phone.

postfascion

Yup, talking about topical issues, in circumstances very difficult to fake. He must be aware of the public's cynicism if he is alive, you'd think he would incorporate measures to ease it, rather than going along with traditional methods of interviewing.

StrangeHologram

assange + hannity cgi fake news look: https://vid.me/Xnaf

PoeticallyIncorrect

Okay Jayden Smith

ThePuppetShow

Hannity is a Bush guy and is just like the rest of the MSM. He doesn't care about you.

That said, I'm not claiming this is a fake, I dont have the video editing skills to make that assessment.

bopper

No, Hannity is too proud of his bulldog straightforwardness to be in on such a scam. Why don't some of you call him on his radio show and ask him, I'm sure he'd address it.

ThePuppetShow

Hannity was a Bush "weapons of mass destruction" pusher. He's a tool just like the rest of the MSM

bopper

He's changed dramatically. Your point well-taken, it's why I used to 'hate' him. I think he's still unwilling to accept some truths. If he keeps hanging with the right crowd he'll get better .... but unless many things change, and maybe they will w/ Trump, he will suffer personally and financially for doing so. We'll see. Never liked his combative and boring style, he's easier to listen to now.

snr2snt2000

If you were a father who loved his wife and kids and hadn't seen them in six years because you can't leave a building without being killed, you'd have a hard time keeping a total poker face, too. He's staying strong.

Atarian

Your Sentence Needs More Capitals

ZalesMcMuffin

I never could stand him. Seems just as fake as the rest of the mass media talking heads, to me.

bopper

Never could stand him till he, months before election, began to wake up. Before that he was just an arguing 'fool.' Round and round on a pigtrail. I can listen to him now, though he still rubs me the wrong way. At least he doesn't chew his callers up and spit them back out, like Savage. Savage is mean but I can listen to him 'cause he's pretty smart and has some great life experiences.

ZalesMcMuffin

This interview... just watch, and tell me what you think.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xrf7qYRdKRw

bopper

This is Alex Jones, what does this have to do w/ Hannity? Confused. What am I looking for (that's a whole 15 minute video).

ZalesMcMuffin

Oh... wow. That was intended for a different thread entirely. Sorry.

bopper

No problem, things get a little weird around here :) Sounds like something I would do actually.

Blacksmith21

My .02 after watching it and then promptly falling asleep in my hotel room. If I had the right software, I could do this for real, but for now, will have to rely on "trained" eye:

  • Photometric analysis: Lighting seems reasonable, artificially generated in an interior environment using a mix of sources - 3 or more. Colorimetry seems normal with no odd, or unnatural light sources consistent with computer generated lighting. Shadowing is consistent throughout the production, with no points of origin changing locations. Shadow reaction is normal and responsive to body movements and acts predictably. There is one issue I find a little odd, but not concerning - the color temperature of the lighting behind Assange's head, used in the over-the-shoulder shot. The color temp was very high, almost daylight in appearance. It is a very blue color and odd for this type of shoot. There are a handful of reasons for this, it just seemed somewhat abnormal.

  • Motion Analysis: Typically, counterfeit videos exhibit some amount of a range or "artifacts" which often indicate a fake video. These "artifacts" include: aliasing (motion artifacts), bitmapping, tearing or image peeling, jagging, and frame issues. An unaided visual review of the video didn't reveal any of these type of items. That being said, the video was viewed at 1080i, on a consumer LG 42" display with no color calibration. It would be doubtful that many of the aforementioned "artifacts" would be visible on this setup, but some would be. No such inconsistencies were noticed by unaided visual observation.

  • Audio Analysis: Under my current circumstances, there is no way to analyze the audio program with current hardware at my disposal. All observed audio seemed normal.

If this video was faked, it was done with the absolute best of the best hardware. If it was, it would be doubtful that any of us would ever be able to prove it. And even if you could, the mouthbreathers would never understand the explanation.

For now, I'm going to throw down this is proof-of-life.

postfascion

That is an assessment based on technology available to the public, yes? FYI I've not seen the video yet, just playing one of the devils advocate.

Blacksmith21

Assessment based on OSINT.

postfascion

Learned something new, good call.

trevor_reznik

assange looks real to me, but from one of the camera angles hannity seems to have green screen behind him. i really don't know what to think, but if assange was fake it had to be super realistic cgi.

SlackeryTurnBull

So did he really say anything interesting or important in this interview?

bopper

Talked about his kids, got emotional.

waxdino

I thought that it was interesting that he went a bit into the FBI and CIA analysis of Russian interference. He thinks it was shody at best, fraudulent at worst. He talks about the supposed Russian hacking of a Vermont power grid, and that it was debunked (which is recent news).
The focus was really on how wikileaks is trustworthy, and didn't receive leaks from Russia. It was watered down for the average person that doesn't follow all the details. I expect the AMA will be more interesting.

snr2snt2000

You must've missed the shot on the cover of the Washington Post of him exiting an X-Wing Fighter on the roof of the embassy after visiting Taco Bell last Wednesday. He's alive and well.

snr2snt2000

Such concern trolls.

ScientiaPotentia

Okay, AWESOME so he's alive!

HOWEVER we, seemingly, all worried for nothing which makes me pretty pissed off. Why the hell didn't he just provide proof of life back in November when everyone was freaking out? This isn't nothing. This is still important. Something happened. Something prevented him from "interfering" with the election further. Why didn't he appear earlier? Why did all the Wikileaks database files change date to 01-01-1984? What happened with the keys being wrong in November for the deadman's switch?

Where they threatening his family? He did mention his family in this interview.

I am really happy he is okay, but something is amiss here.

juhos

all worried for nothing which makes me pretty pissed off

I think majority of us wasn’t really worried.

ZalesMcMuffin

No, I think most of us were worried. Assange went dark for a couple of months. That's like half a lifetime, in current year Internet years.

Theupsidedown

It could have come out 4 months ago though, for all we know.

JoJoVoat

Agree

THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES

Hannity has been a CIA asset his entire life. Did you hear him talk about the WMD's?

He isn't completely a farse, but he is an asset. Assange is dead (most likely)/captured/in-hiding. Just because they are forging interviews of Assange, doesn't mean any of his leaks are invalid.

Also means Hannity might be a good guy in the CIA. If he is helping dispel the "Russian hacker" fairytale.

JoJoVoat

Is there a part two ? I missed it if he said so

antiracistNew

Why not ask him why he doesn't go to the window?

Why not ask him why there was a help him tweet?

Why not ask him about the 1:01 timestamps?

Nope, just hurf durf Russians and iz u a jornolist, just like I predicted.

https://voat.co/v/Wikileaks/1533310/7461231

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1491081

It was the same interview as 19 days ago. Absolutely no new information. Just the government showing off their awesome video editing software.

@SarMegahhikkitha @bojangles @eagleshigh

Votescam

It seemed that if you brightened up the Pilger internview and reversed Assange from right side to left side, you might get what we saw tonight. Also, note the mentions that he has his internet connection back?
What's anyone hearing from him?

SpikyAube

I just REALLY don't believe Pilger would go along with any funny business. He is the opposite of a dumbed down vacuous puppet MSM journalist. He's a proper journalist who believes his job is to challenge the powerful and be a thorn in their side, not to help give their crimes a makeover. Unless they dispatched with Pilger and CGI'd him too.

snr2snt2000

Indeed.

e-traiu

Buuuut some dude over @ Thedonald Pointed out that the Assange interview is on Seth Ritch birthdate.

Another huge breadcrumb?

bopper

Wow.

quantokitty

There's no doubt it's him!!! I pray that in 17, this nightmare can be put behind him and that justice can prevail.

snr2snt2000

Yes, and I pray for his family and for our heavenly Father's provision.

bopper

He got a little emotional there talking about his family. It seemed.

mrjdouble

I've been watching this interview closely, here's a couple of my thoughts:

  • Why is he so much higher than Hannity? The perspective and lighting seems to be different between the two.

  • There is an interesting echo in the room on the vocal track, but both parties seem to be experiencing it the same.

  • Hannity's head looks much smaller than JA

  • Hannity is not allowing JA to fully answer questions and he keeps cutting him off

  • JA is articulating well and probably speaking faster than he normally does because Hannity is being impatient, but I get the impression he was not briefed on this questions prior to the interview starting.

  • Not saying this is happening, but the outline around JA looks strange, and how I'd image if he was indeed sitting in front of some kind of greens screen.

Any other thoughts from you guys?

Edit: Sorry guys, great to see his face and hear his voice after so long, but I'm not sure this qualifies for legit PoL. The reason that i'll say that is because this is clearly heavily edited footage and perhaps more compelling is, there is no mention of the release date and everything covered in this piece was old news. Absolutely nothing was recent within the last 30 days.

Edit 2: Formatting and words

tstr

Perhaps we can all pester Hannity to release the original unedited interview. Probably a long shot but never know. He might go along with it.

mrjdouble

That'd actually be helpful, not likely to happen.

Let's sit tight for this AMA coming up and maybe he will sign a doc for us or do something else that makes it 100% certain he's alive and well.

snr2snt2000

Someone please downvote this concern troll. I still can't downvote because I haven't commented enough yet.

mrjdouble

There was no trolling there, f@ggot. How about this --> kindly go fuck yourself --> over there

snr2snt2000

Hey, thanks for that. I haven't been called a faggot for more than a quarter of a century, and that was by a freshman in high school at the time.

Anyway, here's my olive branch. Now let's get back to the pizzagate investigation. Peace.

mrjdouble

My fault. I can get fired up, I wasn't trying to get a reaction or stir the pot. There is no other agenda besides some of my INITIAL thoughts directly after the interview was ending.

We can move on from this.

bopper

And love.

snr2snt2000

You forgot:

• I looked behind my TV and even took it apart, but neither Assange or Hannity were in there. What sorcery is this?!

mrjdouble

Good one, dude! Good one! Totally burned me.

waxdino

Didn't he mention the "Russian hacking" of the Vermont utility, which is recent?

EndThePizza

Yes,and it's very recent. The news came out Friday i think, and was only debunked this morning?

mrjdouble

Did you happen to read that on snopes?

bopper

Yeah I had my wife come in and check out the sitting height difference, but I'm not too worried about it as of yet. Regardless, I believe they're both speaking in 'real time.'

SlackeryTurnBull

Assange's eyes are oddly glassy, or wet looking.

snr2snt2000

Almost as if his body was lubricating them so that they didn't dry up like raisins.

SCIENCE!

mrjdouble

Also a good point, not confirming or denying that but that's obviously a classic hallmark of sedation.

francine_rose

It's NOT the Russians haha

Sooo what mom and pop shop was Hilary's server (the bathroom)

Has that place been investigated

SlackeryTurnBull

Not sure why people assume this guy is a hero. His hair is uncomfortably a bit like Hillary's for my taste.

Optick

So... Does this confirm he's alive?

SlackeryTurnBull

Now that we know that he's alive, what does it mean that he helped elect Trump?

snr2snt2000

He didn't help elect anyone. All he did was expose WHAT WAS ALREADY THERE (i.e., the truth), like he keeps saying.

It was the DNC corruption, etc. that helped elect Trump.

SpikyAube

He didn't help elect Trump deliberately. He just released information that was already in existence at a time when he knew it would be seen by a lot of people. The fact that Clinton has done so many dodgy things is just the truth, he just allowed the truth out, if he hadn't he would have been deliberately covering up for her. I don't think not covering up for Clinton is equal to helping Trump. That it helped Trump was a by product of telling the truth.

followthemoney

Yes.

The ambiguity was, therefore, intentional.

throwaway345678

Looks like it.

snr2snt2000

I would say, yes.

Koched_Up404

Agreed, I had my doubts but i should have trusted in John Pilger. He let us know he was alright back in November.

WatcherWatcher

I think this is really him too. Now I think all the "Julian is comprised" talk might have just been meant to confuse whistleblowers or convince them not to send anything new to Wikileaks. I don't know what to believe here, but this interview passes my gut test. I'd like to see a live AMA video chat but.... In any case, I agree with @bopper . This universe is getting fucking weird.

THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES

No. There is a mathematical way to prove that he has the same PGP key that he had before. He hasn't signed a message with this "mathematical signature" since his internet went out. He is never in the same frame with the people interviewing him...................

However, I hope the people "keeping his image alive" are the good guys. I mean he is supporting Pizzagate stuff. His dead man's switch is supposedly in block chain: 383000 to 383100.

Theupsidedown

Really him, sure...but when?

ThruTheHaze

Well he spoke of stuff that was said on Dec 29.

GenghisSean

What stuff was he referring to? I think that's really him, but I wish he would have said December 29th so it couldn't have been month old footage.

ThruTheHaze

He did.

Full interview

start at the 4:05 mark.

Ciscogeek

Live, or even just a candid quick upload of something. Not out of this controlled source. Why is it so hard to just grab someones phone and go? There's a lot of on line in regards to that. As a result, I'm still skeptical; there's some amazing unknown technology out there.

EDIT: Also, wtf Fox... This is actually semi-reasonable journalism. Is that... r-respect I feel? Whoa.

jml1201

Honestly, with the crazy technology we have and the whole hologram thingy. Is it possible they used one and he works for another countries government? Why hasn't he ever showed us a video from himself? Why cant you see what he is sitting on in the interview?

Bottom line after all the lies in media YOU JUST NEVER KNOW.

As for now I believe it's real but there's always a possibility it's not. Don't forget that.

Votescam

Feel the same way you do -- Very much hoping he's alive and well. But wish he had worn something different from Pilger interview. Hair is pretty much like Pilger interview - And in one shot he seems to be sitting up rather high -- like on a Bar stool? Also, would have liked to have seen something of crew setting up -- and Hannity and Assange a bit closer together -- only one shot of them in same frame, but they're quite a bit apart. Also, in both Pilger and Hannity, Assange has light beard on chin. Different lighting -- generally different hand movements, but in Hannity you don't see all of the hand movements as they are below camera range.

JoJoVoat

Hannity was on Cavuto earlier today briefly and he said that he is confined to a very small space. He said it a couple of times really emphasizing the small but gave no comparisons so maybe that's part of the reason for the odd angles. It also looks as if Hannity is sitting at a lower level than Assange didnt it? But I personally think that's him. He has no windows either! Didn't he say that? I couldn't image not having sunlight.

francine_rose

It shows his shadow even on the background

I get you're being critical

If he was fake then why would it be going on about our cause?!

jml1201

I believe it's real for the record. I still wonder what happened to PHASE 3? Also, why he never made a personal video after his poll he tweeted.

francine_rose

I'm not sure... I thought he was dead... now I'm like okay. But I heard he wasn't going to do phase three till trumps in office We will see

jml1201

Alright thanks

bopper

Could have been any number of reasons this has been such a clusterfk.

francine_rose

This universe hahaha Praise kek

bopper

I had to google that. Am I not hip enough?

francine_rose

Pepe the frog

Look into the cult of kek It goes along with taking down Moloch who these pizzagate pedos worship

bopper

Isn't Pepe the frog the thing alt right was involved with? I'll check it out (cult of kek).

squidicuz

Damn you! Let the rabbits wear glasses !

francine_rose

Yes ANd it's why Hillary clinton was terrified of Pepe and did a shoutout on her website

It's also on the conspicery playing card game

bopper

Give me a link man, I am unenlightened on this matter :) If you can. Thanks.

bopper

Hey I just saw a tweet that said "Praise Kek."

Vindicator

You will also see people respond to something humorous with "Kek." It's basically Korean for LOL, if I'may not mistaken.

4thDaGrymReaper

Real as fuck. The Wizard is alive.

bopper

Yeah. There's apparently only three camera angles/shots, and it's probably pretty awkward setting anything up in that room, My opinion. People are tweeting it's fake, ridiculous, fake how? Others are saying they're nuts saying it's fake. This universe we're living in is getting awfully weird.

JoJoVoat

people yelling fake are the lefty liberals more than likley

THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES

No. Him being dead and the validation of his leaks are not related. He is dead and his leaks are all legitimate.

Once he signs a message with his PGP key, we will know it's likely him. He hasn't, since October.

KanyeMKULTRA

Could be fake, he's been in hologram interviews before. The previous video of Assange had some really weird editing, or CGI.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ozdD6avrYE

hologram- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaB3Zw5_p9c

EndIsComing

At this point I'm kind of afraid of an actor getting plastic surgery.

THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES

The best way to know that it is him, is if he signs a message with his PGP key, which he has yet to do since Ocbtober. He is dead, however, them faking his being alive does not detract from the validity of the emails at all.

SpikyAube

I wonder sometimes though, if you took footage randomly of several different people being interviewed and treated it like it was faked, whether you wouldn't be able to come up with similar 'evidence'? Although the bit with the collar is definitely really weird and doesn't seem normal at all, but I've never scrutinised footage that closely before so perhaps weird things like that happen sometimes even if it's not fake?

bopper

Maybe just some bad connection. At least that first youtube clip posted.

bopper

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IyyV0r-tMIM

Working for me. Gotta watch it on youtube.