i2amspartacus

If it wasn't so sad it'd be laughable. Their only defense is to accuse the man who revealed insurmountable evidence theyre satanic pedophiles of being one himself. Hey Podesta, we know you're a pedo. His response: ugh, no I'm not, you are. I can smell John's fear.

crashing_this_thread

The MSM defence: "I know you are, but what am I?"

Htaed

Lol. There is actually a special place for them. Tailor made.

yabbadoody

FUCK YEAH, Team America...

StrangeHologram

It's because Assange is CGI!!! https://vid.me/Xnaf

brbomglolwtfbbq

He needs new glasses. He looks like an SJW

remedy4reality

FAKENEWS @CNN

Sandy008

Hopefully somebody will leak CNN's emails to Wikileaks. There is no doubt a trove of corruption within.

yabbadoody

boo waa haa haa haa haa haa, that would be interesting

DefenderOfTruth

Talk about juicy. Wouldn't we love to dig into some MSM emails. We'd have to start a whole 'nother subverse for that. Ha!

One can hope...

Alpo

CNN has retracted the accusation: https://twitter.com/NewDay/status/816713773939621890

yabbadoody

CNN sucks long donkey dong, every broadcast day... "love you long time" is their motto to USG and advertisers

Birdzeyeview

then they replace the retraction with more crap about Sweden. Sue them, Julian.

MAGABoomer

Retraction won't be enough at this point. Wikileaks needs to stay the course on the threat to sue. CNN has been a mouthpiece for the "establishment" pedos for too long...and the "retraction" was in error in regards to the "rape" allegations. There was no rape as per the SMS messages between the two women. Basically he didn't use a condom. Sweden lets Muz rape children with zero consequences, but Assange doesn't use a condom...and they cook up an international plot to keep him in "prison" without a trial for 5 1/2 years.

Alpo

I'm not a legal expert so I don't know if Assange can still take legal action after CNN's retraction. A few things are noteworthy though. CNN slanted their retraction to make it look as though the pedophilia allegation was in relation to the rape case - apparently they want to avoid drawing any attention to the plot involving the phony dating site. CNN has still not complied with Assange's ultimatum regarding the demand that CNN expose this plot, and I can't see them actually doing that, as it would seem to go completely against their whole reason for existing.

ZalesMcMuffin

Yeah, they didn't issue a simple retraction. Why add in the stuff about the rape allegation? It seemed to me they were just trying to muddy the waters so people wouldn't see CNN as having simply issued FAKE NEWS. If there was a deeper agenda there, I didn't pick up on it (not that that's in any way conclusive).

MAGABoomer

INAL either, but their retraction did not meet the terms of his request. And I agree, CNN cannot expose the plot without killing themselves off in the process. Wikileaks will have to sue. You're also correct in the carefully worded statement...but I don't see that working, just reading the comments proves that. People are on the warpath. Good.