@ pungentweed
yeah, and all psychology study shows that rehabilitation of sexual addictions like pedofilia have almost zero success in rehab. Those aren't good stats, but they put them back into society anyway. This is one of the errors in world society which always brings it down: think Babylon destruction, Rome, Greece because it destroys and consume culture like a cancer from the inside.

If you reject it, they blame you for not being loving, tolerant, equality minded, etc etc, although my blind fold has been fully removed for a long time, but I'm now at the point that there is only one solution.... ending duality altogether in the format which it's been presented. People have 2 choices, either choose duality and be erased or choose non-duality and some changes to the system to continue. They keep messing with balance and it doesn't work. It hasn't worked in past and the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.

The erasure would be what happens to cancer when it's excised and removed. It disappears. But the original ripple of choice presents this further choice, which is to stop throwing the object into the water (ripple effect in relation to duality). It's just a different way of me agreeing with your comment.

I hear ya. Not a day goes by I don't say that at least once. No doubt the political shithead writer of that article, Blankley on capitol hill trying to figure out how to infiltrate all areas, but I'm not sure the Christian magazine realizes that they've just allowed an article to delegislate pedophilia under the former and latter debate about consenting adults, without even using the few brains god gave them to rationalize that babies, toddler, children can't give consent!!!

I can't approach the people in this magazine, because I'm too emotional. Maybe somebody who talks their language can call them out on it. I'm more like you, and don't know their type of perverted religion.

Weird. It's gone now, no need.

I'm not clicking on any of that. I'm angry enough as is. I'm wondering has anyone mentioned the site on YouTube called Hairless Pussies. I just watched a Titus Frost video about it

Yea, that's confirmed: Old Steiner looks like a proper pedo if i've ever seen one.

Big deal, there's plenty of Google+ groups that promote drug use (meth) and stuff

It's a "secret memo". It seems to be in action though.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GZy8V7NAagQ

...

It's the charismatic Christian magazine with a big following. Yeah, that's the perversion all right. It's sneaky sandwiching kids into adult sex legalizations. It's a safe link, but I copied the content of the article for anyone on a cell phone who might not want to click on it.

The P isn't in there yet, but the lbgt foundation made this...

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-AvnL2kivjNI/WGhMutpjb9I/AAAAAAAAAPk/-PG6C0UHEf4FIPcHoNouopDAzmBVUzBVwCJoC/w530-h414-p-rw/001.png

Looks like a great Headline for BEFORE ITS NEWS! Do folks post these threads on that site? Sure would seem to be a way to get something like this out there quick and large. ?

You might be interested in one of the articles they linked on their page.
I just copied it on this thread.

They've linked to an article on the Christian Charismatic magazine in support of everything including pedophilia.

What. The. Fuck, man...

One of the articles on the community link was on the charismatic Christian online magazine. I clicked on it and this is what I found:

http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/59816-next-up-legalization-of-incest-necrophilia-pedophilia-zoophilia-and-more

it looks like a Trojan horse in the Christian system - When you read the article notice how the writer, a political worker Bethany Blankley, has sandwiched and lumped pedo's with every other type of sex from incest to gays.
This is the political agenda to desensitize and normalize pedophilia .

They use the argument that consenting people make it legal.

The problem is that children can't consent, toddlers can't consent and babies can't even talk. But they appeal to the idea of equality and consent by sandwiching it in with adult sex habits. Children can't consent especially if their groomed to accept it. It isn't a healthy way for children to live.

Notice the writer is Bethany Blankley, political worker on capitol hill. Oh yeah, she's workin it in the charismatic Christian field.

link quote:

By destroying the institution of marriage, the "gay rights" LBGQTI movement made possible the extension of similar "legal rights" for other "lifestyle choices," including zoophilia, consanguinamorous relationships, necrophilia, pedophilia, polygamy, and every other "fluid" sexual preference or identification—including sologamy and trans-polyamorous relationships.
Efforts to normalize sex with animals as an accepted lifestyle choice resulted in one documentary winning an award this year that idolizes a sexual relationship between a man and his bottlenose dolphin lover. The 40-year movement to legalize sexual interaction with children is working. People are publicly advocating without shame: "I'm a pedophile, but not a monster;" and, "pedophilia is natural and normal for males." Now, incest activists in the consanguinamorous community argue it's their turn to have their sexual preference and lifestyle choice validated socially and legally. Because of a case in New Mexico that's making national headlines, incest activists argue exactly what homosexuals argued to normalize incest. "I was born this way." "I can't choose who I love." "I have a right to be happy just like everyone else." "We aren't hurting anyone." "Who is the government to legislate love?" Incest activists maintain that all sexual preferences and acts should be legal if they are consensual and don't harm anyone. More importantly, the government should not be legislating love. Christina Shy, an incest activist who runs an advocacy and support website for consanguinamorous people, and is in a relationship with her half-brother, argues that incest "needs to be brought to the attention of everybody in the country and people need to start thinking differently. It was the same with gay people just a few years ago and now they can get married they are accepted. Well why not consanguinamorous people like us? We are all adults. We are not pedophiles, there's no domestic issue. We are in love, we want to be together, but we are related. That shouldn't be a deciding factor." She's right—if sex is consensual among adults in the privacy of their own home—how is it wrong or even illegal? How is consensual sex between two adult men different than consensual sex between adult brothers and sisters or adult mothers and sons? If two adult men can legally marry each other, why can't consensual adult incestuous couples? Why should one consensual relationship be denied and another legal? Incestuous adults aren't coercing anyone. They are knowingly making choices about their own bodies, so why does anyone have a problem with it? It's really none of anyone else's business.

If transgender people in America, who represent less than half of one percent of the population, can have the government dictate bathroom policies for non-transgender people in public schools and stores, why won't the government legalize consanguinamorous relationships? Homosexuals, who represent less than 3 percent of the population in America, can legally marry and adopt children, why can't incestuous, polygamists, pedophiles and zoophiles? If morality and laws are determined by personal preferences (that are fluid and always changing) to justify societal norms, why is a different standard being used to legislate incest, necrophilia or pedophilia than that of same-sex relationships? Incestuous relationships are mutually consensual, therefore they should be legal. (The same reasoning can be applied to murder. Surely, if two people agree to murder someone, in fact a group of people consent to murder another group of people, their consent justifies their action, which should therefore legalize murder.) The same goes for polygamy. And necrophilia. Why is having sex with dead people wrong? The corpse doesn't care. It's dead. It doesn't hurt the corpse; it doesn't even know what's happening. Granted, it can't consent to the sexual act, but that doesn't matter because there are enough necrophiliacs to argue that their sexual preference is normal. When it comes to not hurting anyone, incest activists argue that abortion is legal, so again, what standard is being used to legislate harm to another person? They are right. If a baby has no constitutional rights, and adults do, why can't the adults, who aren't harming anyone else, be together? Practicing homosexuality used to be illegal. Now gays can marry. Times have changed, so who has the audacity to suggest that incest is not the new normal of the 21st century family? Or bestiality? "Non-human animals have incestuous relationships and multiple partners," some activists argue. Likewise, it's well-known that kings and queens had incestuous relationships for centuries to 'keep their bloodline pure.' So, who is the government to legislate love? Everyone has the right to love whomever they choose. All love is equal. How is heterosexual love better than incestuous love or being in love with multiple partners? As the defendant in the New Mexico case argues, as to why he should be allowed to love, have sex with and even marry his mother, he says: "This is about whether I have the right to love someone. And I sure (expletive) have the right to love Monica. You can't tell people who to love or who not to love." His mother's name, Monica, could easily be "Matthew," the name of a brother, father, uncle or homosexual boyfriend. No love is wrong. Gay rights activists and corrupt politicians who chose to legalize same-sex marriage and transgender bathroom policies, have no justification to prevent the legalization other sexual behavior.
Bethany Blankley worked in politics for over 10 years, on Capitol Hill for four U.S. Senators and one U.S. Congressman, and in New York for a former governor. She also previously taught at the New York School of the Bible and worked with several nonprofits. She earned her master's degree in theology from The University of Edinburgh, Scotland, and her bachelor's degree in politics from the University of Maryland. She is a political analyst for Fox News Radio, and she has appeared on television and radio programs nationwide. Follow her: @BethanyBlankley , bethanyblankley.com.

directly underneath is an advertisement to come to God:

Reasons Why you should read Life in the Spirit. 1) Get to know the Holy Spirit. 2) Learn to enter God's presence 3) Hear God's voice clearly! Go deeper! Has God called you to be a leader? Ministry Today magazine is the source that Christian leaders who want to serve with passion and purpose turn to. Subscribe now and receive a free leadership book.

Here's an easy-to-share screenshot of the group with an archive link https://sli.mg/1wXnmL

Ernst Steiner -- the multiculturalist Pedophile. He's over here, too. Sort of an interesting community... looks like they all want to be heard.

Beastiality and more, many on cl. Disgusting..some busted are in news. Mexico bars- beastiality, esp poor donkeys!!

Because this http://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000158-6a12-d435-a9ff-7f5ae4080001

You'd think they would stop using it by now FFS.

Boylinks Google search results https://www.google.com/search?q=boylinks&oq=boylinks&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l3.9966j0j4&client=tablet-android-samsung&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8#scso=uid_WHLKJwAKQr8Kg-zjtACk5g_0:1229

Facebook search

https://m.facebook.com/public/Boy-Links

Twitter search is interesting Check out these search results: https://twitter.com/search?q=boylinks&s=09

Yes, and links to something called boylink.net I did not click on it. I do not want that on my web history.

Okay, what's zoophilia? Are they just inventing words now?

Part of the programming. Google are no angels. There are other search engines, ones that allow what Google suppresses, like truths.

Welcome to the internet.

My God this has to stop! This is what they are putting in children's minds that that not only is this normal and acceptable but if you stand against it you are prejudice. They are literally censoring the internet from people trying to stop peadophiles, or let's start calling them the name they deserve since they seem to like the term pedophile they are child-rapists!!!! Now adding even another letter of the alphabet LBGTQ and P for pedosexual. I am opposed to govt. censorship or corporate censorship because they obviously choose what is real or fake news based on their own political agenda. We have to take a stand for morality as people. This investigation is driven because all of you can not tolerate the thought that innocent children are being harmed much less possibly intentionally traumatized via rape sanctioned by the government. We have to take a stand this feels like the last chance.

Good question, can you mark it as spam/offensive content?