nomorepepperoni

This is the same Milo who was filmed at one point bathing in pig's blood (and we know the spirit cooking crowd loves pig blood more than bacon for some reason).

https://youtu.be/7SRlK8bZvqk

Considering it sounds like he may have been abused at one point in the past and is in denial about it, or so it seems (oh no I was the predator), I don't think he's so much protecting them willingly as fearing the results of giving the cult away. He may have slipped due to his overly blunt demeanor and said more than intended to Rogan.

Maybe if/when pizzagate is finally brought to justice, he can be just as blunt and trollish about this as everything else (assuming he isn't trolling with this, as well).

jangles

I respect this comment, I had stood up against some ppl here and was down voted for calling out the hate. Thanks for your stance here @DNChatesprogress

just_clueless

Wow, that personal history really makes sense and is very sad...But covering for these people isn't doing anyone any favors Milo...Don't be another abused turned abuser

ibepokey

this explains a lot about how he came to be himself.

Orange_Circle

I believe he's right about pedophiles being accepted in Hollywood. But it's practically acceptable within the male homosexual community to be attracted to younger boys. They just get a pass for it.

Even Milo had large posters of shirtless boys up behind the podium at his GOP party.

Gannicus11

Also skip 2-3 minutes forward to get the the relevant stuff

Gannicus11

I was watching Milo's videos of his political standpoints, then stumbled upon this interview.

I admire Milo's opinions about a lot of things and think he's a good guy. Pay attention to what he says especially near the end. It seems as if pedophilia is normalized among specific social circles in Hollywood and among the elites, and that among them it is not viewed as immoral.

Furthermore I would not be surprised if it is in the liberalist agenda to lower the age of consent, and to make people believe that children have the capacity to consent to sexual acts.

Think about it - Far left liberals advocate such things as giving kids hormones if they believe they have been "misgendered". If they think that kids have the capacity to make decisions regarding this, then I wouldn't be surprised if they believe that children have the capacity to consent.

I would love to hear what anyone else thinks

Don-Keyhote

The problem i see with your analysis is that historically the age of consent has been around the age of puberty and possibility of childbearing. If girls are gonna have sex at 14 as they do now it may as well be in matrimony. All social science indicates that the fewer sexual partners a woman has the higher her chances for material success and happiness. The raise of age of consent laws itself is probably the same liberal bullshit that has led to both parties guaranteeing that "kids" up to age 26 can rely on mommy for healthcare.

I think their agenda of earlier sex ed etc is just another example of their disastrous good intentions. Promoting licentiousness is their raison d'être and they know they're raising kids into a sea of STDs, so they probably see free condoms as necessary

Vindicator

Mods would love it if you added time-stamps to PG-related evidence with brief descriptions to video posts. :-)