This is the thin end of the wedge: cry 'hatred and bigotry' in efforts to guilt-induce the population that your 'human rights' are being infringed upon.

This man will tell you he's 'in control'. He rationalises and justifies his sociopathy/illness by saying that he doesn't actually touch children. What he doesn't tell you is that his 'virtual' addiction to children involves his viewing child porn. Once we open the door to saying it's okay for men to view child porn, then we set up an avenue for people to exploit and abuse young children because there's a 'market' for it. What he doesn't tell you is that he will ogle and perv at children and fantasise about having sex with them; that he will masturbate to photos of young children. This is the beginning of abuse. Once you open the doors to children being objectified sexually, the children are not protected and the men want to move on to the real thing. Please don't fall for the BS of 'poor us pedophiles'.

Imagine if someone claimed to be a "virtuous murderer".

https://archive.is/bAUS5 :

'Virtuous' paedophile who is aroused by girls reveals why his wife has stood by him | Daily Mail Online

"I don't think it was abuse, but it left me with the impression that little girls want to be touched."

'I had never called myself a pedophile, but for more than 50 years I have been sexually attracted to little girls. '

'I knew that it was wrong, but frankly in the fifties, every male I knew was sexually attracted to children and little girls. ', "But then a girl said they wouldn't reject me, so I told them I'm sexually attracted to children and they all rejected me."

'And so then I was single again in the late-nineties, in 1997 and 1999 I spent some time out in the South Pacific, lots of little girls running around naked there. '

This has been an automated message.