I had to remove more disinformation from my website. MARIO-PIZZA "Cheese Pizza Lovers" isn't real and here's why. ( pizzagate )

submitted by pizzagateDOTcom

At the top of my front page, I had this old piece of "evidence" as part of my sourced collection, which is also copied from the sticky on /v/pizzagate :

Hello Cheese Pizza lovers!

We are offering to send fresh (not seen on Tor before) pictures of Cheese Pizza direct to your email. We will only send to Tor email services (SIGAINT, TorBox etc).

When we send you email we will also include a .onion address that has not been seeded / posted to any Tor hidden service directories. You can sign up at that address to purchase more fresh pictures of Cheese Pizza as well as trade your own for BTC.

Here is how it works: 1) Choose from the menu below and deposit the correct amount into the BTC address -> 12h5PpA4ok6mbfxL8TjCLe3QMZuhWvVTzs 2) Send an email to [email protected] - keep it simple. All we need to know is the BTC address you sent FROM 3) We will reply within 1-2 hours (our daytime) with an email containing the .onion address and a ZIP file with 10 pictures 4) If you purchased more than 10 pictures we will send more emails. Each email will contain a ZIP file with another 10 pictures. If your email service rejects the email - your inbox is full etc - don't worry, we will wait a while and try again until you receive all the pictures you ordered

Cheese Pizza menu:
- 10 pictures = 0.01 BTC
- 25 pictures = 0.025 BTC - 50 pictures = 0.05 BTC

Looking forward to serving you some fresh Cheese Pizza!

Cheers,

Mario :-)

I looked at the history of transactions for that Bitcoin Address. You can view it for yourself here: https://blockchain.info/address/12h5PpA4ok6mbfxL8TjCLe3QMZuhWvVTzs

There is only 2 outgoing transactions from that address, only 1 of which closely relates to a price on that "menu". If it was a service, it sure didn't get any customers. The real bogus flag however, is this:

  1. Type that address into google.
  2. One of the only "clearnet" results is to this forum thread: https://2hu-ch.org/thread-24823b7c90d5836d93da6d51625abfe08077fb54.html
  3. I ran a who-is on 2hu-ch.org and it was registered in 2016. This conflicts with the thread date of **Fri Jul 31 05:47:05 2015 **

If somebody can prove that this advertisement for "cheese pizza" was in fact existing on the internet (clearnet or darkweb) PRIOR to #pizzagate breaking out, I will gladly add this back to my site.

I will continue trying to clean up my site to include only properly sourced material.. thanks.

Millennial_Falcon

Spreading an image of a non-existent post that can't be verified with a date prior to #pizzagate seems to me like disinformation. Do you disagree with that?

I'm just not certain the post wasn't prior to pizzagate. For one, can you put a link to the "whois" result in your post? Also, it seems possible that the website had older threads from elsewhere posted on it. The site is called "overchan;" maybe that means it's some kind of aggregator?

I believe the other one I removed was the artwork circulating by Kim Noble. She has not come out as being a ritual abuse survivor, and those pictures were drawn by one of her "multiple personalities". I agree that she could be drawing these pictures as an outlet for dealing with a childhood trauma, however I searched the web and couldn't find anything published regarding her real past. Using her pictures, particularly as a source for the "handkerchief under the victim" theory seems to be reaching a little far.

Noted. I will remove that bit, at least until such time as sources can be found.

The wiki article that is sourced does not reference pedophelia even once in the entire article. It seems to be a code used amongst homosexuals, and that's it.

I think the handkerchief code is still relevant, as it indicates a plausible explanation. The code isn't necessarily exclusive to homosexuals; it may have been adopted by others who wish to communicate sexual preferences using code. As for the significance of white, for now I will change that to a suggested possible meaning, until such time as a source for it can be found.

It occurs to me that another possible explanation for the handkerchief email is that it was just a handkerchief, and had a map folded up inside it. This seems somewhat unlikely, though, as in his reply, Podesta said "it's mine, but it's nor important," not "they are mine, but they aren't important." So it seems the handkerchief itself had special significance.

Thanks for your thoroughness!

tehthu

The pizza related handkerchief map is the kernel of this discussion, imo as well. All other things have plausible deniability.

Interestingly, it wasn't even Pedosta that violated his OPSEC.

I wonder if Susan Sandler is even alive still?

dickface8

PRECISELY!

I-am-not-James

A while ago Urban dictionary defined it. I can't check and add links at the moment. Definition entry dates would have to be cross verified, but I thought there was a thread confirming that. I may be wrong tho. Check urban dictionary for that info and dates?

I-am-not-James

art work that predates pg. I don't have a link on my phone. The pic shows a square paper or cloth under the child.

Alpo

Have you seen this one? http://www.funnyjunk.com/Congratulations+its+a+pizza/funny-pictures/5437783/

It has Cheese Pizza in the comments at the bottom of the page.

dickface8

While we're at it off the top of my head, it's been established (I think) that things like the "#hotard" pic upon further analysis is most likely JimmyComet calling the person in the thread a hotard. Seaman still spreads this all the time too and he should know better. Love David though.

I-am-not-James

How was this decided or deduced? Who was he calling hotard. Link?

Does the same apply to catapul comment?
And comment what what in the butt?

redditsuckz

Who was he calling hotard. Link?

https://archive.is/gMkFG

I-am-not-James

Thanks. This could go a few ways.

  • if he was calling joewills a hotard it likely would have been on the same line, not separate. Like in # hotard @ joewills on the same line. These people arent normal so there's that.

  • @ joewills describes the pic to joewills.

  • hotard describes the actual pic. This is in keeping with the other basic commentary format sofar.

  • Sandusky's earlier incrimination having a charity that supplies disabled people so it wouldn't surprise me. Any link to Sandusky's groups?

  • this forum had a convo describing this experimentation, possibly linking elites interest in eugenics or the dumbing down of society. Control dominance submission.

  • If I recall it was on this forum I read a link to Cathy Obrien detailing some preference to torture rendering subjects disabled as a preference. I dont have the ability at this time to confirm that voat info or broaden it out.

Have all these avenues been cbecked before dismissal?

dickface8

I don't have a link to the source but check out phreethinker's comment below, should fill you in.

Millennial_Falcon

Yep. I removed that from the summary sticky a few days ago.

Millennial_Falcon

spreading disinformation is a tactic to cloud over the real stuff.

I understand this well. But I'm not really following your argument on this in particular. You seem to be saying (1) that since this bitcoin address only sent someone something once, it's probably fake. Eh, I don't know.

And (2) you searched and found the post on a website that was registered later than the date of the post. So you think someone registered a website just to make one fake post with a fake date? Or someone hacked the site and change the posting date?

In any case, the possibility of that individual post being fake isn't particularly relevant, as we have other evidence to corroborate the use of "cheese pizza" as code for child porn.

By the way, you said you had to remove "more" disinfo. Was there anything else you found in the summary sticky that you found questionable?