MolochHunter

impressive. +1. I'd be inclined to use more independent language in it 'allegedly' 'appears to' 'seems' 'may have' instead of 'has'

chip the certainty off it, it both comes across as more thoughtful, moderate and credible, and also makes it harder for the accused to sue you

Vindicator

JrSlimss, I am giving this post a "Needs more Sources" flair to help get people in here to start add suggestions to fill holes. I saw this all over Twitter yestday, by the way.

JrSlimss

Awesome. So yeah, so the citations are primarily on the sub-pages, as the intro describes. I know they debated bringing them forward to that page - but that whole article was meant to be an overview and there is much more useful information on each individual person, place and organization that is very important, so it is meant to send people down each individual rabbit hole.

However, if you find a source missing on any sub-page, please reply here immediately. There shouldn't be anything missing though.

Astrodreamer

Nice start. Hasn't even touched on Middle East yet.

JrSlimss

Looking for people to weigh in on missing stuff. They'll be taking changes.

MolochHunter

One major omission from it, though (if its author is reading) is the evolution of Operation Brownstone, the long running CIA program whose purpose is to generate incriminating evidence (fake or real) that can be used to compromise the worlds most powerful politicians, bureocrats and businessmen. Its an important link to understanding how the sexual/gay revolutions of the 60's/70's reduced the 'sting' in the operation and led Brownstone to go darker than its original 'extramarital affair / homosexual' honeytraps to paedophilia, which - a generation on - now has many 2nd generation victim / perps

I havent found Brownstone on wikipedia - was it never yet declassified ? I found it hard within a quick 10 minute research to find any official acknowledgement of it