Did you find any familiar names?

I wonder how long MAP has been used for minor attracted people? It would explain a lot if it's a term that has been used for decades.

Same here, and we pansexuals better be and remain the only P EVER associated with said community indefinitely. I'm not even fully convinced of the "mental disorder" whitewashing, like they're just bipolar or something.

Edit: What the fuck? That makes no sense, the definition of pansexual is "gender plays no role in attraction", not fucking children. Degenerate slimy bastards don't care who they scapegoat, as long as it takes the heat off of them..

ah, I thought it was something along the lines of "I survived testosterone poisoning"

Once the floodgates for perverse people are opened, there is no holding back - until one day a Adolf Hitler or a comet restores the healthy natural order.

I posted a thread recently on different attempts that have been made in recent decades to normalize pedophilia:

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/1535361

One example is the Rind study from 1998. It sounds similar to what B4UAct has been saying recently. It claimed to show through research (it was a study of other studies) that boys who are sexually exploited aren't harmed like girls are, and suggested that some cases of child sexual abuse should be called "adult-child sex" instead, and that the words "victim and perpetrator" shouldn't be used in those cases. The study was published in the APA's prestigious "Psychological Bulletin," and it was shown to be severely flawed. Congress condemned it, and the APA walked it back, but it has been used by pedophiles, including by their lawyers in court, to claim that boys aren't hurt by sexual abuse.

*need death in prison via unofficial means

most people don't want to date a genderqueer person because they're generally insufferable leftists who weigh 300 pounds and have short blue hair. lol

And... XX male syndrome? HAHAHAHAHA, wow you're good. I'm using that one :D

non-binary applies to gender, i'm talking about sex that can physically happen.

and if you want to go there, LGBQ are all your non-straight-base relationships. Trans is not a relationship and unlike the others, only involves one person. It's like Intersex but in the opposite way. Oh and Nullos!

of course they are, unless you include people who bang animals. Who would also be covered by "pansexual", by the way. If there are only 2 kinds of functioning reproductive systems/sex organs to be interested in, and we're not allowing weirdos... then there is no need for the term "pansexual" as it could only go as far as "bi sexual".

And yes, i know it's not the demi god but you should look into what the little guy was into ;)

again, the people behind the B4U-ACT are medical professionals so i wouldn't be surprised if the people behind that paper and that organization are somehow related.

Pansexual, they argue, covers "pedosexual". Pan Sexual, as in the god. Full spectrum sexuality, none are to be excluded!

How cute that they've given themselves the nice acronym "MAPs" (minor attracted persons). What a fucking joke.

These people need to be locked up forever.