I was thinking. Wouldn't Assange and wikileaks possibly have the emails that Hillary and co destroyed/bleachbitted? ( pizzagate )

submitted by dickface8

Surely many people have thought of this already but it just occurred to me. Those emails were leaked way before she was subpoenaed right? Does that mean that WikiLeaks has the scrubbed emails? This is for sure a pizzagate related post btw as the deleted emails could most very likely have contained all the missing pieces of the pizzagate puzzle.

AreWeSure

NYPD sources don't leak to obscure websites that do ZERO original reporting. They live a media capital and can leak to places with actual power.

G_Gordon_Linguini

I think he actually has more Podesta emails. Has he ever said that all of them that he had were released?

dickface8

No the opposite I think, I'm pretty certain they've said they have more.

Nana66

They are probably in Russias possession also because of Guccifer (who's probably dead) and why we need to start war with them..

salinaslayer

Everything would be public by now if Wikileaks released a key, I don't think they will, the consequences are too serious, it's a far better shot to give Trump a chance to conduct a quiet purge without existentially threatening the government

AreWeSure

None of the place you link to do reporting. What they do do is make up fake quotes.

dickface8

It's getting really hard to find genuine news sources. Twitter is full of outrageous salaciousarticle links to websites you've never heard of before.

AreWeSure

The article's headline says "might have" not "has." The FBI has now reviewed the emails on Abedin's laptop.

AreWeSure

Hillary Clinton's emails weren't leaked.

Flat_Truth

I think there's three different sets of "emails" (or more) being talked about. Hillary emails were the ones released by the FBI, acquired through their investigation.....Podesta's emails were released by Wikileaks and were leaked by a hack into his account. The NYPD allegedly has the emails from the Weener laptop, which have not been released yet.

AreWeSure

Hillary's emails were not released by the FBI and the FBI would not have the authority to release them. They were released by the State Department after a Freedom of Information Act request was granted by a judge.

The only Weiner emails that will be released are any emails that would be entered as a court document as evidence.

dickface8

What are you getting at? They were hacked? Either way.

AreWeSure

No. They were not. Podesta had his emails hacked.

Clinton's emails became public due to a judge's order.

clowntrash

Some of her emails became public. She bleachbit most of the juicy ones.

wh0care

yes i saw it, its what i believe too...probably some huge shit in the upcoming releases.. :o

SIMONBARROW

Unless Wikileaks releases them, we are likely, at best, to see only highly redacted versions.

dickface8

Yeah for sure, the powers that be aren't gonna let that shit out.

Theupsidedown

You're fucking stupid. Go away.

wh0care

it could, and they surely have also more of the Podesta emails too....they dont release it all, for me there can be various explanations:

  • their content is huge/incriminating, and they kept it, for 1) wait to be sure of what will happen in U.S election. or/and 2) kept it for their own insurances, like for assuring them some security, implying that Podesta and Co know what they have ,so IF something happen to Assange that they will be released...so they cant touch him...

Maybe they will release some or all after Trump taking office...

FriesischShipping

Podesta emails missing before May 3rd 2007 = ? Why?

Flat_Truth

I am thinking there will be a release within the next couple days. That timing would throw Trump's adversaries off guard leading into the inauguration.

lurch91

No, none of these reasons are true. Assange in his AMA on Reddit this past Monday explained why they don't release it all in one time. Its to be able to meet the supply with the demand. They did John Podesta's emails in batches like they did to closely match the supply with the demand. People were so hungry for a leak, and when they released a certain batch of just several hundred emails or a thousand, people searched through that batch in depth and Wikileaks would give it a little time to allow people to go through them all (that specific batch) then they would release another small set. Assange said if they had released it all at one time, it would have been too overwhelming for their readers to process and digest at one time, thus leaving a bunch of information out there that gets buried and unsearched through due to the supply being greater than the demand at that time.

rkozzy

It's a very cohesive process with many reasons, but from the first DNC email dump they said they had hundreds of gigs worth of photo and video attachments, that seemingly havn't been released yet. I'm sure if there are any smoking guns in there, the strategy is timing. Especially considering that cryptic tweet from yesterday, I'm sure we're in for something big guys, buckle up.

wh0care

thanks, i didnt watch it entirely...its a normal and good process actually, even if the theory of them waiting to be sure about who gonna be elected could be also a reason for release some, but yea its just my theory here... waiting for it

jonnythaiwongy9

I would think so.