VieBleu

I'll give it another go. appreciated.

zzvoat

What you've already written is clear as a bell to me. No need to change anything unless you feel like it.

I don't know the answer to the question you've posed as it relates to your main premise. Was it a veiled threat and/or a direct reflection of what he was operating within?

It's a very interesting thought and something i had completely missed. Thanks for lifting it up.

VieBleu

thanks for your comment. to be fair I did brush it up a bit and I think it is clearer.