gopluckyourself

sensitive rule 2 please try /v/pizzagatewhatever or /v/askpizzagate unsourced inquisitive remarks that aren't investigative in purpose are more relevant to those places.

sensitive

Politely disagree. This has everything to do with the investigation: it is an important strategical question. Please reconsider.

gopluckyourself

k rule 2, 4 unsourced and meta post
(2) EVERY claim that is made as part of your post needs to be sourced. If you are asking a question, give a brief summary of what led to your question, and provide sources for those elements. If you are giving an explanation of how your content relates to Pizzagate (satisfying Rule 1), and you need to connect a few dots to do so, please provide sources for your "dots". If you wish to ask general questions about Pizzagate, please do so HERE.
(4) META submissions and general discussion submissions without sources will be removed. To avoid diluting the front page, please make those sorts of submissions HERE. Please bring any meta concerns you have HERE (this is also where the mods will discuss moderating the sub, so you are welcome to participate in those conversations as well).

dickface8

I'm not holding my breath... He may prosecute the Clintons but as far as blowing pizzagate wide open, I just highly doubt it.

sensitive

Fully agree since most likely many other countries / governments are involved. But the Clintons could get the ball rolling ...

sensitive

Everything is possible. Your suggestions?