pizzagatedotcom rule 4 meta post/general discussion post with no sources. please repost over into v/pizzagatewhatever . I do think debunking is extremely important to hone the investigation tho cheers.

Ok. One I found early on was "The article about the shooter was written before the events happened. accordingvto google news crawler. (Which is similar to a claim made in a sandy hook truth video), however, a search will reveal that the crawler took timestamps based off that website's time, and its a bug that happens to a lot of articles. Lots of support tickets for it.

Good luck with your site. Are you the same guy who had it before but got scared because the shooter was from the same hometown?

And those spitting propaganda mix in many true concepts, videos, etc to their tweets.

Is there a way we can combine this info and look to see if it's legit? I haven't posted it because I'm not gonna vouch for the info and pics I've been giving. But perhaps the stuff is worth looking into.

Phase 3 begins

"First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, and then you win" -Gandhi

Are you able to share which twitter accounts are doing this ?

Here is the balance that will need to be struck: Concern Trolling versus Genuine Skepticism

Not on the overarching question of, "Is Pizzagate Real?" That shouldn't be up for debate here, of all places. But on the individual validity of each piece of potential evidence.

A wonderful disinformation strategy would be to flood us with lots of "too-good-to-be-true" evidence and let us go wild with it...only to ultimately, and very publicly, be debunked - making us look like tin hat fools.

Obviously, the other side of this, is not to dismiss damning evidence out of fear of a trap.

It's a delicate balance, and one where a Concern Troll can sound just like a Genuine Skeptic, and vice versa.

I have been getting messages on Twitter from someone who sends me info and pics to pass on, but they aren't willing to post themselves. Evasive when questioned. Anyone else getting messages like this?

There are shrills on this site downvoating posts on purpose. We need to have that stopped.

excellent idea