Weak a pee dia is well known to be a CIA asset. They suck suck suck!!! Imagine, just like days of old when people went to the mainstream news now the go to that crap hole for info but if it is something that the alphabet agencies don't want you looking into, they smear it, ridicule it and discredit it. Same goes for ritual abuse weak a pee dia did a number on that one
Agreed, it's super easy for people to be "Oh Wikipedia says it's debunked, guess that's it then" and move right on past it. Such bullshit as it has not been debunked. Needs to be changed.
Please stop your disruptive editing at Pizzagate and please stop inserting links to your draft article at other articles. We do not link to draft articles. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done.
If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.
Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
▼ 21yearsofdigging
Weak a pee dia is well known to be a CIA asset. They suck suck suck!!! Imagine, just like days of old when people went to the mainstream news now the go to that crap hole for info but if it is something that the alphabet agencies don't want you looking into, they smear it, ridicule it and discredit it. Same goes for ritual abuse weak a pee dia did a number on that one
▼ Phenomenonanon
Yah that is terrible
▼ iamthepizzanow
Agreed, it's super easy for people to be "Oh Wikipedia says it's debunked, guess that's it then" and move right on past it. Such bullshit as it has not been debunked. Needs to be changed.
▼ Tor1
Pizzagate[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing at Pizzagate and please stop inserting links to your draft article at other articles. We do not link to draft articles. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done.
If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.
Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:James_spencer_moulson#August_2016