(Trying to keep personal information out of this)
There seems to be some question as to the legitimacy of Pizzagategear's police report and the content contained within. I personally had a threat deleted that had valid information concerning the report potentially being made
difficult to find
, as oftentimes, and only since Swann announced his report, did this seem to happen. In an effort to confirm the validity of the report I began to look over it and where it came from.
I typed in some information from the report into google and found one of those information sites that compiles data from driving records to police reports, etc. It was about the alleged report and it had a "source" button, which I clicked and it led me
here
, Citizen Police Department Consortum. To further verify the site's legitimacy, I
called
the
Gavelston PD
and asked them about it, confirming I could use it to look up police reports.
So there you have it, 100% verification that the police report was actually filed by the man who says he filed it. You may debate the content within the report if you would like but with this information compiled you cannot deny that the report actually exists. Filing a false police report is not taken lightly, PGG would have to be extremely narcissistic to go to those lengths while also claiming to have refunded all money made thru PGG.
▼ downwithpizzaelites
Well the MODERATORS of this community have now driven off a second Alefantis victim .
This is disgusting!!!
▼ bopper
This poor guy Ryan can't catch a break. The PD area code is same as my personal, so I know a little about the situation.
▼ FriesischShipping
Sorry James, you've been outed on this post, be a good boy and go do some Pizza for an hour, or better yet, just snitch on everyone in your operation like you have done since your college/salad days.
▼ FriesischShipping
You're out your fucking element Jimmy!
▼ FriesischShipping
Fuck off James.
▼ IsThisGameOfThrones
They did not but I will ask
▼ tjarco
So correct me if I'm stupid here, but you are 100% verifying this without showing any verification?
▼ downwithpizzaelites
I sourced it out in the OP.
I called the PD and it's confirmed the report was filed, yes.
▼ tjarco
So you asking me to take your word for this? Can't record a voice call? Whether you actually sourced it or it is still questionable, no 100% verification other than you telling us so...
▼ downwithpizzaelites
You're welcome to call for yourself. The call went something like this, "I'd like to confirm the website "" is valid for checking police reports."
My reply was, "uh huh."
Take it however you want, I found out what I needed to know and wanted to share it.
▼ downwithpizzaelites
Yea, Alefantis in on an operation to incriminate and rat himself out.
Makes sense?
▼ downwithpizzaelites
Man, when the guy said "Kill Room" he wasn't calling it a kill room specifically, he was using it as reference since it was one of the most popular IG pictures. By mentioning "Kill Room," then everybody would know the building he's referring to was the location of the IG picture, "Kill Room," one of the bigger mysterious regarding JA's IG.
And apparently information that was important enough to trigger James pretty hard....
▼ IsThisGameOfThrones
This user has been saying bad stuff about me for quite a while. Constantly tries to say I'm a CIA shill. Has attacked many others. Do not listen to this person.
▼ ConcernedParent2
I saw the police report when it was first shared via the local police department. If this guy is just trying to trick us, then he's got to be the dumbest person ever since it's a crime to file a false police report.
▼ FriesischShipping
I'm pretty sure it's a felony if it's a federal crime (terroristic threats).
▼ SlackeryTurnBull
He could have told the police something that likely couldn't have been proven false, such as someone came up to him on the street and threatened him. Or he could have had a friend on the police department that he made the report to. Or he could be an actual government agent charged with spreading disinfo. All three possibilities should be considered when determining if it's real or not, lacking any other evidence saying it was.
▼ ConcernedParent2
He made a police report claiming JA made threats against him. There is no way someone other than a complete and total idiot would file a false police report and hope they can say something that couldn't be proven false, it's too risky, especially if JA decides to contest the allegations and sue for defamation.
▼ SlackeryTurnBull
There is NO PROOF that he made the report about Alefantis. Look at the police report and show me Alefantis' name. It's not on there. Since when do we accept things as true without any proof? It is true that Alefantis could sue him for defamation, and that brings into the possibility that the guy is a shill working for the government. Without proof, all options have to be considered.
▼ ConcernedParent2
The original report I saw did have JA's name on it.
▼ SlackeryTurnBull
And where was that? You could really break the case wide open if you would produce that. But let me guess, you can't.
▼ ConcernedParent2
All I can tell you is when it first broke someone found the guy's local police department and told us the docket number so we could find it ourselves and see what it said. People wouldn't go crazy over a police report with no information on it, that doesn't make sense.
▼ SlackeryTurnBull
Your argument doesn't make sense. Another shill tactic. They ARE going crazy over a police report with no information on it. So, your point is...?
▼ ConcernedParent2
No they aren't. Before the police report came out, lots of people didn't believe Ryan, and those that did still remained skeptical and told him to provide proof. That initial police report was highly scrutinized and only after it was confirmed real did people start going nuts and reporting it.
And FYI, you aren't going to be doing yourself any favors by claiming everyone a shill.
▼ Sheilaaliens
Police report: http://p2c.lcpd.com/viewreport.aspx?id=636203630588124852
The case # is 17000111
Case status: inactive
▼ downwithpizzaelites
I find it strange how the tide turns against this guy and people all the sudden find James Alefantis incapable of the allegations?
▼ SlackeryTurnBull
I find it strange that you equate skepticism toward this guy's claims with finding Alefantis incapable of the allegations. Surely a shill tactic.
▼ downwithpizzaelites
Debate the claim all you want, this thread was to confirm that he did in fact file a police report, valid or not.
You'd know if you bothered to read what I posted.
▼ SlackeryTurnBull
And if you had read my reply you'd know I was contesting the claim that the fact that he filed a police report meant anything in itself. ESPECIALLY if this was disinfo, which it looks like it is.
▼ downwithpizzaelites
That's not the discussion of this post.
It was to verify the report was filed, not the content or veracity of the claims within the report. That will obviously come at a different time in potentially a variety of ways.
▼ SlackeryTurnBull
No one was disputing that it was filed. Why would they? There's nothing on it to prove any of it really happened.
You were trying to make the argument that since it was filed, that it was proof of the guy telling the truth, which it obviously is not.
▼ Insubordinate
No doubt. I find his story credible. He's taken appropriate steps by hiring an attorney, filing a police report, and securing evidence. Also, it took tremendous courage to do the interview with Opperman.
▼ IsThisGameOfThrones
Yeah that sucked. I'm pretty sure shills had some influence over that though. Most everybody is very supportive nowadays.
▼ downwithpizzaelites
Some hardcore shilling going on. I noticed some on Ben Swann's page last night as well.
One guy specifically, who even lived in DC, was trying to cover for him very hard.
▼ FriesischShipping
Wouldn't you if someone was threatening your Cheese Puzza supply?!?
▼ SlackeryTurnBull
What a joke. So the guy who COULD be pulling a hoax, might be pulling a hoax?
I wonder if this is the same info that the "wife of a Google executive" supposedly showed David Seaman? Did it only list "terroristic threat" as its only defining factor, as well?