Maybe he needs to come here and explain each detail that investigaters have found. That would be better than silence or trying to intimidate people. Also, it was John Podestas emails, so maybe he should explain as well.
I can't believe they fall for that shit just so they can be in a special secret club. It would be cringingly laughable if it weren't for the fact it was dreamt up and used by sociopathic madmen to enable and conceal their hideous crimes. It reminds me of Grease 2, the one with Michelle Pfeiffer and Maxwell Caulfield (the underrated and superior of the two Grease movies in my opinion), where the mean bullies in the 'cool gang' the T Birds with their stupid matching jackets convince poor Maxwell to do all their homework for them - he desperately acquiesces and what's more, is grateful for the opportunity, ever hopeful he will one day get to wear one of the dumb jackets so he can be one of the cool kids and feel like his dick is just that bit bigger now that he has the license to terrorise the students in the grades below. Only in this case it's not cheating on homework it's rape and murder, and instead of silly jackets, it's silly robes and woo woo masks. The heinous nature of their crimes belies the petty, insecure childish and frankly ridiculous make believe they're all into.
This comment is the kind that would probably incite them to murder out of pathetic narcissistic insecurity. The truly powerful are those who need no such external validation or exercise of cruelty to feel important- they are slave to no one and nothing, and can afford to be kind and generous because no matter what they give out of love to others, none of it takes away from the calm and steadfast knowledge that they are valid without reference to anything or anyone else.
Give what a rest? Calling out you shills for constantly spreading misinformation? He's right and I wish more people would realize it and stop paying attention to your garbage shill posts.
Calling someone a pedophile is a case of libel per se. There is probably a case of corporate liability if they distribute libelous material.
People wrongly think all speech is protected by the 1st Amendment, this is incorrect. . Libelous speech is not protected by the first amendment, you have no right to libel someone.
Yawn, has to be taken to court and proven that you were willfully lying and intending to cause harm with the words you spoke. So this libel suit is bullshit and never going to happen.
Also, it's debatable if Alefantis would meet the higher standard of being a public figure in a regular libel case.
But if he did the standard is actual malice
”Actual malice" means that the person who made the statement knew it wasn't true, or didn't care whether it was true or not and was reckless with the truth -- for example, when someone has doubts about the truth of a statement but does not bother to check further before publishing it."
He would be able to argue they didn't care or were reckless with the truth.
However, for libel per se all he has to do he show he was never arrested for child abuse or child trafficking. I'm sure YouTube has lawyers who understand libel
Oh no doubt. It's not that he's right, it's that they are a business and lawsuits are noise they don't want to listen to. Customer complaints are much easier to handle.
Ok, except libel and slander and defamation don't apply if we are criticizing pornograpic material on JA's public Instagram account and restaurant. I understand you act as the devils advocate here, but do it in places where the evidence is flimsy, and don't waste your time on this.
Okay so this is maybe a weird idea, and it may not work at all, but porn sites like YouPorn get TONS of viewers, so many people watch porn, so maybe some of these PG expose vids could be uploaded to porn video hosting sites. Yeah, they might get taken down eventually for not being porn, but it could get it out to a lot of people, especially if you're a bit sneaky and title them something else perhaps. It would be gross and shocking, but could have a good emotional impact, to title them things like 'lady politician takes advantage of young girls in satanic orgy' ok that sounds horrible even typing that, but I guess I was thinking people might click on it out of curiosity and then seeing what it's actually about, the contrast between the titllating title and the horror of the reality of it might have more of an impact. I don't know, I'm not a media person.
But even if you didn't go that route it could also get people talking about it just because of the fact that these videos are being uploaded to porn sites for exposure, because of the massive censorship going on elsewhere, or just because it's weird to see videos like that on YouPorn or whatever, and people talk about things that are weird? Just a suggestion, it might not work, but I guess anything is worth a try given the stakes, right?
wouldnt you expect many of the CP ppl watching porn online and them seeing this and then going after you (for SOME FUCKING REASON it appears that the CP community has unlimited fucking money, which allows them a great many
other
freedoms, and is the BASIS of why the masses are relegated to subsitance living (aside from the luxury tax {for their luxury}))
Well you would obviously upload it anonymously, and also the CP people can see all the PG videos on Youtube and vid.me etc, so that particular concern is not any different for a porn site than it is the way videos are currently shared!
are you trying to kill my boner? Don't do that, just keep creating more and more profiles on their platforms and making and uoloading more videos. it's about taking the battle to them. They want you to censor yourself and move to another site. Don't, beat our enemies using their own weapons. making them work constantly to cover up their crimes so they don't have time or breathing space to commit new ones.
Yeah, it's very likely that several very high up execs at Google, YT, etc are on the take and receiving money from the same people that pay Alefantis to traffic kids.
His mouth has probably been on every gay dick of any note in the U.S...from Jack Dorsey to Spez...to the gays of google...and he's also probably got a lot of blackmail on people. 850k blackmail paid by his lover to the ex...for some reason....wonder what can be worth 850K of silence?
▼ Intheknow
or what? sounds like a threat.
▼ Intheknow
Maybe he needs to come here and explain each detail that investigaters have found. That would be better than silence or trying to intimidate people. Also, it was John Podestas emails, so maybe he should explain as well.
▼ Insubordinate
There is a reason JA is ranked in the 50 most powerful people in DC. It's not due to his dumpy pizza restaurant. He is connected.
▼ FriesischShipping
He's probably grand-bottom-wizard of their faggy little club.
▼ SpikyAube
I can't believe they fall for that shit just so they can be in a special secret club. It would be cringingly laughable if it weren't for the fact it was dreamt up and used by sociopathic madmen to enable and conceal their hideous crimes. It reminds me of Grease 2, the one with Michelle Pfeiffer and Maxwell Caulfield (the underrated and superior of the two Grease movies in my opinion), where the mean bullies in the 'cool gang' the T Birds with their stupid matching jackets convince poor Maxwell to do all their homework for them - he desperately acquiesces and what's more, is grateful for the opportunity, ever hopeful he will one day get to wear one of the dumb jackets so he can be one of the cool kids and feel like his dick is just that bit bigger now that he has the license to terrorise the students in the grades below. Only in this case it's not cheating on homework it's rape and murder, and instead of silly jackets, it's silly robes and woo woo masks. The heinous nature of their crimes belies the petty, insecure childish and frankly ridiculous make believe they're all into.
This comment is the kind that would probably incite them to murder out of pathetic narcissistic insecurity. The truly powerful are those who need no such external validation or exercise of cruelty to feel important- they are slave to no one and nothing, and can afford to be kind and generous because no matter what they give out of love to others, none of it takes away from the calm and steadfast knowledge that they are valid without reference to anything or anyone else.
▼ downwithpizzaelite
Can anybody confirm he is a Mason?
▼ Lunari
Give what a rest? Calling out you shills for constantly spreading misinformation? He's right and I wish more people would realize it and stop paying attention to your garbage shill posts.
▼ AreWeSure
Calling someone a pedophile is a case of libel per se. There is probably a case of corporate liability if they distribute libelous material.
People wrongly think all speech is protected by the 1st Amendment, this is incorrect. . Libelous speech is not protected by the first amendment, you have no right to libel someone.
▼ FriesischShipping
Yawn, has to be taken to court and proven that you were willfully lying and intending to cause harm with the words you spoke. So this libel suit is bullshit and never going to happen.
▼ AreWeSure
Also, it's debatable if Alefantis would meet the higher standard of being a public figure in a regular libel case.
But if he did the standard is actual malice
”Actual malice" means that the person who made the statement knew it wasn't true, or didn't care whether it was true or not and was reckless with the truth -- for example, when someone has doubts about the truth of a statement but does not bother to check further before publishing it."
He would be able to argue they didn't care or were reckless with the truth.
However, for libel per se all he has to do he show he was never arrested for child abuse or child trafficking. I'm sure YouTube has lawyers who understand libel
▼ phlux
hah! he would likely claim that the libel itself is what made him a public figure and try to seek a damage modifier on his suit
▼ FriesischShipping
JA has political gatherings/fundraisers = entering the political arena. We have nothing to be afraid of for reporting findings.
▼ AreWeSure
If he is getting things removed due to potential libel, I think he is focusing on the liability of the company and not the individuals
▼ FriesischShipping
Oh no doubt. It's not that he's right, it's that they are a business and lawsuits are noise they don't want to listen to. Customer complaints are much easier to handle.
▼ AreWeSure
Look up libel per se vs regular libel
▼ FriesischShipping
Ok, except libel and slander and defamation don't apply if we are criticizing pornograpic material on JA's public Instagram account and restaurant. I understand you act as the devils advocate here, but do it in places where the evidence is flimsy, and don't waste your time on this.
▼ Womb_Raider
The Masons sound... extremely nefarious
▼ shoosh
Vid.me is censoring too. Bad Guacamole does a vid: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VWru3zc8my8
▼ SpikyAube
Okay so this is maybe a weird idea, and it may not work at all, but porn sites like YouPorn get TONS of viewers, so many people watch porn, so maybe some of these PG expose vids could be uploaded to porn video hosting sites. Yeah, they might get taken down eventually for not being porn, but it could get it out to a lot of people, especially if you're a bit sneaky and title them something else perhaps. It would be gross and shocking, but could have a good emotional impact, to title them things like 'lady politician takes advantage of young girls in satanic orgy' ok that sounds horrible even typing that, but I guess I was thinking people might click on it out of curiosity and then seeing what it's actually about, the contrast between the titllating title and the horror of the reality of it might have more of an impact. I don't know, I'm not a media person.
But even if you didn't go that route it could also get people talking about it just because of the fact that these videos are being uploaded to porn sites for exposure, because of the massive censorship going on elsewhere, or just because it's weird to see videos like that on YouPorn or whatever, and people talk about things that are weird? Just a suggestion, it might not work, but I guess anything is worth a try given the stakes, right?
▼ phlux
uh... you have a weird idea -- but some thoughts:
▼ SpikyAube
Well you would obviously upload it anonymously, and also the CP people can see all the PG videos on Youtube and vid.me etc, so that particular concern is not any different for a porn site than it is the way videos are currently shared!
▼ Jakestr
I like this idea it is unconventional and unexpected
▼ FriesischShipping
are you trying to kill my boner? Don't do that, just keep creating more and more profiles on their platforms and making and uoloading more videos. it's about taking the battle to them. They want you to censor yourself and move to another site. Don't, beat our enemies using their own weapons. making them work constantly to cover up their crimes so they don't have time or breathing space to commit new ones.
▼ SpikyAube
Why not do both? I think killing some boners should be the least of our worries. Sorry boners.
▼ Womb_Raider
so vidme is trash?
▼ User890020
For sure he knows someone at Google
▼ islandofdelight
Eric Schmidt is somehow involved in this. George Webb's videos have alleged that Schmidt is a CIA NOC (non-official cover)... and most recently Schmidt is connected with Eric Braverman allegedly resurfacing - http://www.bizjournals.com/sanjose/news/2017/01/18/ex-clinton-foundation-ceo-to-head-eric-schmidt.html Although still no sightings or words from Eric Braverman for 3 months.
▼ User890020
I think braverman has been located, as you can see in one of the recent webb videos.
▼ pizzaequalspedo
Yeah, it's very likely that several very high up execs at Google, YT, etc are on the take and receiving money from the same people that pay Alefantis to traffic kids.
▼ it_was_foretold
Alfantis> David Brock (his ex, head of CTR Clinton PAC) > Eric Braverman (former Clinton Foundation CEO, now works for Google executive) https://twitter.com/YaleSOM/status/822204078960902149
▼ iamthepizzanow
Doesn't need someone high up to pull this off, its really not that hard for someone get videos taken down when they are the subject of said videos.
▼ MAGABoomer
His mouth has probably been on every gay dick of any note in the U.S...from Jack Dorsey to Spez...to the gays of google...and he's also probably got a lot of blackmail on people. 850k blackmail paid by his lover to the ex...for some reason....wonder what can be worth 850K of silence?
▼ Phenomenonanon
Wtf