You're more familiar with him than me, but I suspected he was setting up a hit piece. But hey even if it's a hit piece like Megan Kelly I think it's still a good thing because it's being talked about and some people wake up from stuff being attacked as well. I don't see how any publicity could be bad at this point since clearly the idea is being attacked and dismissed by everyone. I feel like attack is better than dismiss.
People think you're a shill because the bullshit you pull, let's not pretend. It's absolutely silly that you pretend to not know that... you literally run a fucking sub called PUZZAGATESHILLS. Like get real...
I had the same thought, but concerned he doesn't have depth of knowledge. David's videos are abbreviated, I don't want to sell him short, however, he makes some leaps that are fine with ppl in the know, but to an "audience that knows nothing," it's problematic.
Yeah good point, I think what we would want to do is choose a few guys that can interact with David, and feed him what we want him to say to prepare him. Maybe invite him to a thread.. we want his stature and charisma etc. but with facts from the best of us..
Kenneth Lipp on Twitter: "@ThomasBernpaine Sorry, last question, who's a good "spokesperson"? (not really a cause or org so of course no such official thing, but best narrator, say)"
Daily Beast writer requesting a Pizzagate "spokesperson."
ITT balanced coverage requires a GOOD spokesperson even if Daily Beast has an agenda.
Please comment with suggestions and why.
Thanks!
▼ Fateswebb
Man, HTH, that would be great, he has a decent sized audience.
▼ Fateswebb
For some reason the twitter link is taking me to voat main.. what???
Never mind it was twitter.com I clicked on not the title. Still weird as I would think that would take me to twitter.com
▼ Fateswebb
You're more familiar with him than me, but I suspected he was setting up a hit piece. But hey even if it's a hit piece like Megan Kelly I think it's still a good thing because it's being talked about and some people wake up from stuff being attacked as well. I don't see how any publicity could be bad at this point since clearly the idea is being attacked and dismissed by everyone. I feel like attack is better than dismiss.
▼ Fateswebb
People think you're a shill because the bullshit you pull, let's not pretend. It's absolutely silly that you pretend to not know that... you literally run a fucking sub called PUZZAGATESHILLS. Like get real...
▼ LightlyToasted
That's fair.
▼ LightlyToasted
Agree, 100%. Is there a prominent person/researcher on Voat who would be a good spokesperson?
▼ Fateswebb
I would ask David seaman if he would do it, that's Davids strong point he is well known, and more of a PR type than a hardcore researcher.
▼ LightlyToasted
I had the same thought, but concerned he doesn't have depth of knowledge. David's videos are abbreviated, I don't want to sell him short, however, he makes some leaps that are fine with ppl in the know, but to an "audience that knows nothing," it's problematic.
▼ Fateswebb
Yeah good point, I think what we would want to do is choose a few guys that can interact with David, and feed him what we want him to say to prepare him. Maybe invite him to a thread.. we want his stature and charisma etc. but with facts from the best of us..
▼ derram
https://tweetsave.com/kennethlipp/status/823768913808855040 :
This has been an automated message.
▼ LightlyToasted
Daily Beast writer requesting a Pizzagate "spokesperson." ITT balanced coverage requires a GOOD spokesperson even if Daily Beast has an agenda. Please comment with suggestions and why. Thanks!