( pizzagate )

submitted by [deleted]

Kwijibo

@gAvenger this is a discussion post and it belongs in /v/pizzagatewhatever See rule 4 in the sidebar (if you can't see the sidebar, let me know)

gAvenger

Vindicator said I could repost. This is the third time my post has been deleted after a long back and forth. I get it, but don't you see how damaging all this shilling and moderation is? It's wasting our time and tearing us apart.

Kwijibo

Sorry, I have to enforce the rules as I see them.

Vindicator

Sorry about the inter-mod confusion, gAvenger. I think the problem here is you did not make this a post reporting a new way of censoring pizzagate on Reddit, supported with your evidence. You made more of a meta-type discussion of opinion, so @Kwijibo removed it. He had no way of knowing KevDude and I both thought it was grounds for a sourced research post based on your original post .

If, after reading over the guidelines, it's not clear what the difference is or how to present your material so that it fulfills the guidelines, please DM me and I will help you. Basically you need to state your premise -- that r/conspiracy has developed a new censorship tactic -- describe how it works/your experience, and link to your evidence. You can describe your evidence and then give the link, for extra oompf. To be safe, move anything you want to say that is opinion or speculative down to a comment; this makes it much easier for mods not to mistake it for Concern Trolling. Does this make sense? Mods genuinely are not trying to pee on the parade, only trying to enforce the guidelines consistently. Thank you for your patience. Please DO repost!