Wolftrail7272

Let me show you why this is a set up. http://www.stlradwastelegacy.com/secrets-buried-beneath-westlake-landfill/ St. Louis is where she's from. Guess whats in the trucks.

Aphoticamy

Claire McCaskill is a dem Senator from Missouri. We hates her, precious. So crooked.

DarkMath

Don't worry. No one trusts the government anymore no matter how hard they try to get their credibility back.

It'll be at least 10 years and probably 20 year before any American won't be suspicious of any government official saying "We're from the government and we're here to help."

Celticgirlonamission

Oh goodie I hope so!

pizzaphish

Don't forget we have Trump. To defeat the cabal we need to do the following: 1. Pray as a nation 2. Come together with our neighbors and family 3. Build a wall and keep robbers out

These secret societies are mentioned in the Book Of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ https://www.lds.org/scriptures/bofm/hel/6.16-32?lang=eng#15

atheist4thecause

Claire McCaskill is a long-time Senator and career prosecutor/lawmaker/politician: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claire_McCaskill

The_Kuru

I think this concern trolling is because McCaskill stepped in it and the shills are nervous. Just reading the concern remarks in the comments at the link and here it's difficult to believe that much density exists.

And you better be plenty careful if you think you have some whistle to blow on a Republican to the Democrats. What would happen if you blew the whistle on Hastert to Podesta? Say hi to Seth. Snopes has plenty of fake debunkings to protect John McCain and other Republicans in their control. Hell, I wouldn't even blow the whistle on a Democrat to the Republicans and I'm right wing. Who can you trust? Well, Sessions I can trust so I'd probably send it to him before wikileaks, but he's a rarity.

RedGreenAlliance

Love the Leftist virtue-signalling profile picture...

https://twitter.com/clairecmc

White woman hugging lots of black kids in an overt display of "look how tolerant i am, how loving, how multicultural". These types are all the same. They'd probably feel a photo of someone hugging white kids 'sends the wrong message' or 'looks racist'. I've seriously seen dozens of profile pics like this, and its usually (no offence) Leftist white women.

How about 'racist' is being overly race conscious and feeling so guilted you are driven into demonstrating "See? not racist!" at every opportunity? how about I put a photo I like, of whatever kids are in my life or work, and not neurotically obsessing over how it 'looks'?

Sorry for the tangent i am just so sick of all this synthetic PC / MC bullshit being pushed for the last few years, its way OTT.

The West is descending into mass mental illness as we've seen with the last election year in Brexit and Trump (all the same demonisation, media bias, stereotypes, fake polls, lecturing actors and musicians, fomenting hysteria and fear)... almost like the Globalist owed media is running the same playbook and is out of plays so just repeats the same sh.t everywhere.

Sorry for the rant and going off topic

privatepizza

I'm with you. Saw her twitter image and vomited. Smh.

SturdyGal

The way I see it is many would-be Democratic whistleblowers are now finding their courage because it looks like it is safe now to come out. She wants to lure them away from going to WikiLeaks so she can neutralize the ones against her master's interests and use the ones that are useful to her master. WikiLeaks is not really making a joke, but rather making the point that there has to be a reason that she want to listen to them now. WikiLeaks knows what happens to dangerous whistleblowers. So it is serious, but just telling you something you already know.

iamthepizzanow

That Wikileaks troll game tho

Kristina_Gilliam

Email them all of the dirt we have on Hillary.

unbiased_researcher

I read it as "now that Trump has won, the Democrats are just now listening to whistleblowers." Pointing out the irony/hypocrisy.

Tor1

Since tweet says still use

https://wikileaks.org/#submit

like always.

They're accepting her endorsement, however ironic it seems to some.

Also, she has cancer.

SpikyAube

Looks to me like they're saying it in a kind of mocking, sarcastic tone, the fact that when they were in power, they were hounding whistleblowers and probably killing them, but now they want the dirt on Trump, they suddenly see why whistleblowers are useful and why they need protection, and so offer up their services a la Wikileaks, despite having trashed Wikileaks non-stop pretty much as traitorous and malign etc. So it's pointing out the hypocrisy, it's not like an advert suggesting whistleblowers should go blow at the Dems instead!

Annon365

Wikileaks always promotes Leaks from other people not just wikileaks

flyingcuttlefish

I like the breitbart link.

I posted part of this on my uranium one post as a comment - on CF-Gate blog ...

https://cfgate.wordpress.com/2016/10/14/uranium-one/

in case something turns up ... and to make it easy to find later (tag is "uranium" on my blog)

Jem777

Seiously you guys do you think s member of congress can throw out immunity offers when the highest levels in the government have been compromised.They have no standing.Give me a break

CactusBrad

Pfft...

"Let us protect you by putting you in the Seth Rich suite, fully loaded with the brand new Scalia showers... exclusive to the DNC"

shoosh

I just woke up and it's strange that I was drawn here like a magnet. I haven't trusted wikileaks since the Deadmans switch leak. I don't believe wikeaks history is either pro dem or pro Repub. I'm very cautious of anything coming out of there now cause it can all be used as propaganda.

nomorepepperoni

They're mocking McCaskill is all. Hence why their own tweet links to the Wikileaks submission page.

They just forgot their /s tag.

privatepizza

Also, the Podesta emails aren't going away, so no need to rush to search them. OR indeed let the world know that you're investigating a thread in them imho, until you've researched and archived your findings.

lurch91

I'm getting the feeling this connection is nothing at all from some of the comments. Is there something to this or am I having effects from sleep deprivation investigating this shit that has consumed my life and i need to go to bed?

privatepizza

Not saying there's no connection bro, but Wikileaks comment was irony imho. If you're feeling whacked out, get some sleep and look at it when you're fresh. Don't think it's urgent to be honest, but maybe leave your post up and see what comes back, Rock on ; )

privatepizza

This is nothing. WIkileaks are pointing out the irony of it, is all. HIllarious... considering the treatment the gov have given / continue to give to whistleblowers, they now want them to release leaks to them? cough splutter

MolochHunter

agreed, lurch91, you missed the wikileaks snark

justanotherpizza

unfortunate that WL is not explicitly questioning the whistleblower request. it leaves too much room for interpretation. both pro and con.

SpikyAube

Yeah I can see why it might be ambiguous for people who don't read in a tone of voice, which many people don't. But given the context and the phrasing, it's definitely a dig/laugh at their expense.

lurch91

Well, at least I know Im not completely insane. Thank you.

lurch91

The reason i dont believe its snark is because people value wikileaks, and what they stand for. Why would they retweet this when obviously people like me didn't get the message? I am sure there are plenty of other that seen no joking matter in it.

Freemasonsrus

I think you're missing the partisan nature of it. She's trying to lay a groundwork of some anonymous whistleblower coming out and saying something negative about the Trump Admin. Demi's are desperate. It's very transparent. Wikileaks is laying the groundwork for something else by pointing it out.

MolochHunter

but to suggest Assange has a suddenly found faith in the democrats is... well... uncharacteristic

lurch91

In which he is doing with the tax returns. We know he is non-partisan, but why the sudden switchup to trumps taxes immediately from everything in the emails that he knows for a fact people like us are investigating and is a major issue? I guess i just thought too soon combining everything that's going on and then seeing this, im beyond tired because this is my life and has been for 2 months. I may have been overly cautious, but in no way shape or form was i trying to be a ctr cuck and post false information/conspiracies. Im going to bed, and i'll check what has happened here when i wake up, and if it proves theres nothing to this, like i mentioned in my post i will happily delete it. But i ask that the mods dont just so people can at least give me their thoughts. If this comment gets buried, please do your best to get this recognized, id greatly appreciate it. Thank you all for what you do here.

SpikyAube

It's always worth it to be suspicious of everything and collect many opinions and trains of thought on and issue!

eyeVoated

This. In other words: One must collect knowledge and evidence from a vast array of resources, and look for patterns to discover the truth.

privatepizza

Indeed. Are you suggesting Lurch, that Wikileaks twitter has been compromised and the .gov are soliciting leaks through the acct? Or what are you thinking has happened ? Im not getting your train bro.

lurch91

Im just saying not everyone is obviously going to imply or think its mockery because i obviously didnt. I know i cant be the only one because there is NO wording in that tweet from wiki that would lead me to believe otherwise aside from the comments im getting on here that its a joke. if i had known everyone else got the memo and im a faggot, i wouldnt of posted this here.

Honestly, i dont know what to think because assange did a live ama on the 12th i believe on reddit, he read off the lastest blockchain and recited that days news and sports scores, and me personally, i seen no signs of cgi. So im so confused. Im not implying anything. what i ran across in this post just struck me awfully weird. I honestly dont know what to think now.

SpikyAube

It's in the 'after 8 years of persecuting whistleblowers' they now want to hear from them - that is not really a great advertisement is it? That would be like saying "Why don't you go and give your info to these same people who just spent the best part of the last decade hunting down people like you?"

privatepizza

Understand. I wouldn't say it's mockery, just Wikileaks pointing out that .gov are now telling whistleblowers that it's safe to leak to .gov. Thats newsworthy due to its outrageousness.

We've no reason to think Julian is compromised. For the heads up that Claire appears in the Podesta and DNC leaks, props to you. Let's dig....

julian_assanger

Without wikileaks, we are still people who give a shit, God damn it.

lurch91

I didn't mean it like that, I see what you're saying now. What I meant to say was wikileaks is the MAIN foundation pizzagate sits on, and how we discovered anything at all.

julian_assanger

What I am saying is that another source will soon be necessary, especially because shits is getting serious.

lurch91

If that may be true, then why is this other source DIRECTLY ties to Hillary Clinton and John Podesta? The SAME people we're investigating?

julian_assanger

2spooky4me

julian_assanger

Lmao "source of outlet"

lurch91

I very quickly put this together, like I said, its 3:30 a.m here. I was about to call it a night and go to bed but i couldnt sleep this off contumaciously without an explanation. give me a little slack.

flyingcuttlefish

I wonder what happened on June 18, 2010 (accidental link click)

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/2

privatepizza

Yeah you did right and it's a great find. Let's see what Claire is up to in the emails. Sleep well bro.

VieBleu

better to put it out there, just in case. You did right. No harm, no foul.

OrwellKnew

It's a Coverup. Take the names and stories...provide immunity..then sweep under the rug

pete_zuh

I will explain....whoever is tweeting at wikileaks is taking a critical outlook that US democrats are now looking to protect whistleblowers once there is a republican in office and then goes on to tell the reader to send info to wikileaks....nothing that crazy....

SayWhatNOWAY

This looks like a setup! She is trying to lure whistleblowers and then LibTards have all the ammo. I hope no one is stupid enough to fall for this! P.s. wikileaks is saying go to them NOT to her.

THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES

WIKILEAKS IS A GIANT HONEYPOT FOR WHISTLEBLOWERS RIGHT NOW JUST FYI. ASSANGE CANT CONFIRM WITH CRYPTO KEYS THAT HE IS STILL IN CHARGE BECAUSE HE ISN'T

Pokes

This. People here are internet researchers but don't seem to appreciate the fact that wikileaks has been taken over for months now. That's what the "help him" and 1984 101 changes were; someone was trying to inform us covertly that the CIA or whoever was now in charge. If you whistleblow without a PGP protocol, you're a moron n will end up being tortured for the rest of your unnatural life in a black ops dungeon in turkey.

THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES

Yup. Couldn't have said it better myself.

AreWeSure

You are misunderstanding why WikiLeaks said this.

lurch91

Then please tell me why. I will GLADLY delete this if i misunderstood it and there's nothing to it. It doesn't make any sense (to me) anyways. I swear i am not trying to shitpost, this just struck me very weird wikileaks retweeting something like this. I could be COMPLETELY wrong, and I hope that I am. Im just a researcher like you all staying vigilant, that's all.

THE_LIES_OH_THE_LIES

DON'T DELETE THIS. WIKILEAKS IS A GIANT HONEYPOT SINCE THEY KILLED ASSANGE. PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW.

CactusBrad

It IS possible that the DNC is trying to set up a narrative in which a Democrat whistleblower is made into a hero by calling out a patsy... But also likely that her cancer has turned for the worse and she feels the need to make a major move on her way out the proverbial door.

Melitica

Right. Her whistleblower protection act was passed in December so she wants to make a mark. But wikileaks says....um, not a great idea.

sensitive

lurch91 is absolutely right. WL would never make such a joke, especially when it can easily be misunderstood or misinterpreted. Something's def. wrong here!

VictorSteinerDavion

No delete, this discussion as fantastic.

The body of the post is solid, great links and a quality discussion has ensued that can help others with the same questions you have.

gr8H8er

No shit! The commentary has taken a life of its own! I was just thinking there needed to be a discussion such as this. It struck me when I read @LadyGoldenVein 's comment that the camera focused on 🌟 🍕 recently focused on a nearby gas station, showing prices over $3.00 and asked "when's the last time gas was that high?" Thanks to Horace Mann's compulsory education based on the Prussian military's 'kindergarten' (a system of brainwashing which ensures soldiers will steadily march into certain death) our skills are lacking. Instead of being taught critical thinking, observatory deduction, self governance, farming and stewardship, we were taught to repeat the narrative over and over and over again. We must help ourselves by helping each other hone these skills to becoming second nature AND WE MUST EDUCATE OUR CHILDREN! They need to learn the truth. 'Hansel and Gretel' is not a fairy tale, it is the history of our folk soul. Teaching children that it is a complete fiction shits on every child ever slaughtered by greed, diminishing and aiding and abetting in the capture and torture of their souls, spirits, energy, chi, life force, manna, what ever your personal perception of Perfect Love calls it. Yep, please don't delete this!

julian_assanger

Today's society views fairy tales as purely fantastic entertainment. Those stories were told as lessons, tools for survival.

AreWeSure

WikiLeaks doesn't like the Democrats. They have promoted Trump. In this case they are calling the Democrats hypocritical.

Melitica

It isn't democrats they don't like...it is the whole system. They are pointing out the hypocrisy of " trust us, we're the government and we're here to help".

On surface, Claire mccaskill is for whistleblower protection. Introduced a bill to extend protection to contractors which was passed in December. At the same time though, she was accusing homeland security committee of cherry picking info to release which would make Hillary look bad..was one of those "we demand you release all of it now" people....which gave democrats soapbox to complain.

She is now chair of that committee.

Jem777

.

lurch91

I'm not trying to get anyone worked up! What does all this mean? I honest to God thought this was something substantial and of importance...? Be honest with me, is this nothing and i'm getting worked up, or is there something here?

derram

https://archive.is/fSzOb :

WikiLeaks on Twitter: "After 8 years of persecuting whistleblowers US Democrats now want to hear from them t.co/QHJ6c0B4RH See: t.co/0traWco5Pu"

https://archive.is/GB6aq :

Claire McCaskill on Twitter: "Any federal employee who wants to visit, we will listen. We will protect you. [email protected] 202-224-2630"

This has been an automated message.