I suspect some of George's commentary comes from our investigation. I'm not saying he isn't spot on, but I feel like the comment about the DuPont tunnels and comet ping pong is speculation based on assumptions that are common here, but unproven. So either he has proof these assumptions are real or he is using the speculation to grandstand the issue. I believe almost all of what he says just the connection to comet is a very strong assertion and without proof I think we just have to look at it as speculation. Unfortunately... as much as it would be great to have such a connection we don't besides a somewhat loose network of people that are aquaintences. lets not lose focus here, our objective is facts, and seperating them from speculation. If speculation was all we are after then we would have a closed case. I can tell you this, I think not falsely accusing is as important as making true accusations.

Where is his claim? Hope you are not serious? He is ex/CIA. Was witness to many of this including the horrors of Kosovo.His investigation is worldwide. Many Pulitzer Prize winning journalist in this with him. He has video pictures of all this in Haiti, Syria, here in the US.? They have the missing 650,000 emails. Should I go on?

That's quite the claim... I mean without any sort of proof. Where does he get this information or he is speculating?

He had a twitter I didn't care to read.