Shut the fuck up you inconsequential piece of shit. Do you know how unimportant you are to me? With no block feature available to me whatsoever, you will completely get ignored from here on out.

Will that upset you, dellcos? You fucking pussy. I bet you throw a tantrum. Jump on your alts bitch...I'll ignore those too. I don't talk to pussies.

As for how long I've "been here"...how fucking young are you? You fucking think this shit is new to people. Wow. You fucking edgy teenager.

No-one needed to give me a pill, I ate all the pills. All of them. And still didn't fucking die. YOU FUCKING PUSSY.

It's not working. I really couldn't give a shit what some random asshole thinks. You're looking over your shoulder for support from "the rest of Voat" like some insecure high-schooler.

While you're looking over your shoulder for "back up", I punch you in the fucking face.

I've been up, I'm still up, I'm not a fucking shill . You won't ever defeat me, you self-confident bitch.

Good luck, faggot.

Are you fucking lost, or what? The Twin Towers are not a single piece of steel, nor are they fuel in a foundry. It's a giant, tall building, you irrational wanker. I don't know what the fuck happened but I'd rather believe every single conspiracy under the sun than say that the twin towers couldn't have possibly fallen down because "jet fuel can't melt steel beams", you drunk piece of shit. Don't you ever dare criticise me on 9/11. I've always told people the Saudis planned the whole thing with the complicity of the US government. I'll be one of your leaders one day - and I should personally execute you for these words.

I didn't say I believed in the entire official narrative. I SAID, that "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" is a dumb statement that ignores many factors and makes people sound crazy.

Learn politics, you fool. Life is a game of thrones. Or a Game of Thrones, depending on your copyright laws. Learn what helps and what hurts.

I definitely agree that the USA was the victim of some kind of coverup regarding 9/11. It's actually a fact, now. Saudis paid for the whole thing and they covered it up. Stop fighting me. You fuckwits don't even know when you've got an ally overseas - you fucking jump all over anything they say as if they're against you. Now i'm swearing. Now you made me swear. Now you made Daddy angry.

Daddy's fucking angry. I'm about to start paying for you to fly over here just so I can fuck you up.

Instead of doubling down on your insecure defenses, why don't you debunk particular claims I posted? Which claims are untrue? Please tell me.

It wasn't a rant, it was a source. If you don't like it, fine. That's the difference between me and you. I'm an intellectual, not a zealot.

Still more valid than a rant online from a random.

I'm inclined to agree, if something shady really did happen to cause the event, summing up the entire conspiracy by focusing on the melting point of steel beams just undermines any other evidence of a rigged explosion.

"Melted" Steel

Claim: "We have been lied to," announces the Web site AttackOnAmerica.net. "The first lie was that the load of fuel from the aircraft was the cause of structural failure. No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC."

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.

But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6384/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center/

Tell us something we don't know

After all the talk about hotdogs at the white house no wonder Melania isn't moving in there. http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/first-lady-melania-trump-may-never-move-into-the-white-house-w464126

I'm not into pizzagate. I think Hillary and her friends are corrupt, but I don't see any actual evidence for a so-called paedo ring.

Pizzagate has been one of the worst things for Trump and his supporters, it makes us look like "jet fuel can't melt steel beams" fools.

Check it out, sure...and if you're right, wow. But for now, I don't see how it's anything other than a waste of time.