@rippingtheveil , you've got some intriguing links here for people to pursue, but you need to make this a discussion post with all of these links described up above in the post itself rather than in the comments. Why: because if this gets traction and people add to it, your links will get buried in comments and it will be very confusing for people to see the scope of what you are saying. We want posts that people can come back to a month or more from now and read on TOP and easily understand what's been found, even after they've garnered hundreds of comments. Also, this provides a poor example to others of how to make a research post. It looks like it has no supporting source material and violates the rules.

I'm going to remove this now, before it gathers a bunch of comments, so you can make a clearer, cleaner post with the same material.

mittens romney http://www.abeldanger.net/2011/12/ann-romney-conspiracy-with-father-mitt.html?m=1

3

https://www.dangerandplay.com/2016/05/05/ben-sasse-and-nevertrumps-pedophile-problem/

http://gawker.com/jeb-bush-borrowed-his-new-slogan-from-englands-most-not-1740064613

there is 2

You could have been doing it instead of talking about doing it. Wtf? Makes you look really stupid.