DICKFART_

This is pretty strange isnt it? why put cryptic messages on twitter and then (in another hidden message) ask to stop the conspiracy theories.. cryptic messages invite theorising.

Might this be a hint that the ones in control of the website are not the same as the ones in control of the twitteraccount?

leahxpearl

Where on wikileaks did you find this? How do I get to that file myself?

nomorepepperoni

Cute RickRoll. :P

MAGABoomer

This is true. I'm not going to make any claims on who did or did not make the video, however there does seem to be a concerted effort to either troll or twist things. For instance the push on "where is Assange" to force him to come to the window. When you'd call them out on the idiocy of it they'd get vicious, as if they had a personal right to know where Assange was.

Then every thing he did do for ProofOL was called fake no matter what it was.

Then came the conspiracy theories, the rush to make Wikileaks questionable.

You've hit the nail on the head.

carmencita

My favorite line in the song is We know the game and We're gonna win. A message? I hope so.

MAGABoomer

LOL they surely won the personal information from every tard who DL and doesn't understand how hotlinking works. So maybe I should just sit back and giggle when the idiots come back crying OMG I got this call....(already a thread on it).

BarryOSeven

No proof of life is no proof of life. And no just because we don't have the right to know where Assange is does not make a video proof of life.

Please leave the investigation. You're not helping.

MAGABoomer

You're lost. And completely missing the point. One had "no we have no right to know" other hand..."does not make proof". There is no proof of life that cannot be faked even going to the window. And telling YOU tards where he is is not exactly a wise move is it? Oh hey here I am fucking shoot me. TIA.

BarryOSeven

And that's why we should consider wikileaks compromised unless they prove otherwise. There was strange shit going on, they have some explaining to do.

MAGABoomer

There was strange shit going on. However if you've ever seen the documentary on Snowden's escape with wikileaks help you will know one thing. Julian Assange knows his business and he plays 9D chess. Give him a little credit. It was like a big giant temper tantrum when "ya'll" didn't get your way and you turned on him. He's right, you're not helping matters. Better to remain silent and be thought a fool, then open your mouth and remove all doubt.

WHY start a witch hunt on Julian? The government thanks you.

BarryOSeven

No the government thanks you when you are neglecting certain suspicions and just give credit because "lets neglect the strange issues, the rest looks legit"

That is not valid research, that is plain stupid.

Strange stuff happened and now they got some explainging to do. And that is the way it should be. But critics know this already.

Stating they are playing 9D chess... Where are your sources on that one? It looks more like they are compromised than they are playing 9D chess. If they were they would already know the results of an action like this and have prepared for it.

MAGABoomer

I watched how Assange literally outsmarted every intelligence agency trying to nail Snowden. That's how. Also, I have nothing invested in seeing Assange at the window. It's not about being critical or not, it's about using common sense. Suppose the situation was engineered to force Julian to show his face at the window? JAYSUS from the shit I read nearly everywhere it certainly worked on you guys. Julian did not show his face. But I knew that anything he did do to show POL would not be accepted because many things CAN be faked. So the push got stronger..COME TO THE WINDOW...and I'm reading that and thinking Julian, if you're alive, don't fall for it.

There's nothing wrong with being skeptical in balance. But the way it's actually happening, is literally, Julian, come to the window or we believe nothing. Conundrum..yes/no? In order to make you guys happy he has to risk his life...AGAIN? Better to let you continue helping the government than to do that.

Wikileaks has a 10 year track record of authentic leaks. Could there be some motive in causing universal distrust? Uproad? There's two sides to this story. I find it interesting that the side most have come down on serves the government interests. Why not try remaining neutral. Stop calling for him to come to the window, stop creating constant distrust of the emails because that's the end game. DO be suspicious of further leaks until this shit is cleaned up. But christ on a cracker, stop helping the government disenfranchise Wikileaks.

Why does Juilan Assange owe you guys anything?

BarryOSeven

The information in these leaks is very very important, every piece of suspicousness shoud be magnified in this case. Anything could have happened october the 16th and it's also our future that is at stake. Why would we otherwise bother with viewing those documents?

So yes he owes us something if he wants to keep us supporting the leaks. At least I'm not going to trust them for now, they have to reprove themselves. They could have known that in advance and that is the way it should be threated. Nothing more logical than the stance right now.

juhos

He did read a newest bitcoin block in Reddit video AMA when was asked.

BarryOSeven

Which is easily faked these days. Proof of life would mean him shaking hands with Trump or something. Not this suspicious shit.