Chad_Stethoscope

From Document 30 : "UNITED STATES’ RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S SUPPLEMENTAL DISCOVERY MOTION"

The investigation began with the identification of the commercial child exploitation website known as “Home Collection.” ICE investigators determined that the same criminal organization was operating essentially a two-tiered child pornography distribution system. Numerous websites like “Home Collection” were set up to advertise access to member-restricted websites. After paying an access fee through the advertising site, an individual was then emailed a user name and password, and directed to a member-restricted website providing access to a large collection of child pornography images.

This guy wasn't too bright:

On October 12, 2006, the defendant, STEVEN GERSTENFELD, made a payment to PayPal account in the amount of $79.95, for 30 days access to the 'Angel Collection 1010', which was a child pornography collection available through a member-restricted commercial website. In conjunction with this purchase the defendant provided his work address at the University of Richmond, where he was employed as a coach of the men’s head tennis team, and his work email account of [email protected] .

The defense team requested to have the images found on the hard drive shipped to three separate experts:

Additionally, the defendant has requested that copies of all image evidence, both charged and uncharged, be shipped to local law enforcement agencies around the country so that three separate experts can review the evidence at their convenience: Mark Vassel, in Ohio; Hany Farid, Ph.D., in New Hampshire; and Arlan Rosenbloom, MD, in Florida.

Is/Was one of these three individuals involved with the ring? Would getting them copies of 'all image evidence' he was being charged with (and the evidence he wasn't being charged with) give them insight into how much of the network had been compromised? The fact that they kept pushing for further discovery, even though it was against the client's best interests, might suggest such an outside influence:

Additionally, the Government endeavored to communicate to the defendant and counsel in as clear terms as possible that such additional discovery requests might be very counter-productive for the defendant. In essence the defendant’s request amounts to a request to generate discovery that could be used to link the uncharged child pornography images in the hard drive unallocated space to specific dates of receipt. The upshot of responding to GERSTENFELD’s request would be to put in hand additional evidence that could enable the Government to file a superseding indictment that would have the effect of significantly increasing the defendant’s sentencing exposure, if he is convicted. Despite the Government’s repeated warnings, the request is still on the table, and the Government is endeavoring to obtain the requested information.

merlow

Yikes. Thanks for going through this stuff. I haven't had the chance to yet. Shoot me a message if you see a reference to a doc you want to see, but I have not yet downloaded, and I'll post it for you.

Poot_McGarvey

Got to get it out under sunlight.

merlow

I downloaded many but not all of the pleadings on file -- the ones that looked to be most informative. Didn't see anything with 1000s of names, but I admittedly have not gone through this thoroughly at all. There were a few things (e.g. subpoena issued to one Sa'ad El Amin) that may be interesting. If I omitted something you'd like to see, just let me know and I'll log back in and grab it.

US v. Steven Gerstenfeld

Beaucephus

Good stuff. Wish we could give more than one upvote. Tnx

zzvoat

Seems like all we need is someone brave/smart enough to register anonymously. Would work if they send your login info via email.

That's all that's needed to do be able to VIEW documents.

At your https://ecf.vaed.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl

"Instructions for viewing filed documents and case information: If you do NOT [my caps] need filing capabilities, enter your PACER login and password. If you do not have a PACER login, you may register online at http://www.pacer.gov ."

merlow

Accessing pleadings, exhibits, etc. (things filed by the litigants) incurs a $0.10 per page charge, subject to a $3 cap per file (i.e. a 30 page doc will cost the same as a 40 page doc). Judges' rulings are free.

Must provide credit card info.

Charges can add up quickly.

I'm happy to download (using my firm's account) and post pleadings that may have potential investigative value. I consider it my small contribution to the cause.

Beaucephus

NOTICE: This is a restricted government web site for official PACER use only. Unauthorized entry is prohibited and subject to prosecution under Title 18 of the U.S. Code. All activities and access attempts are logged.

You first!

RebelSkum

More info and sources about Operation Flicker can be found here, but at least 5,000 were implicated: http://pizzagate.wiki/Operation_Flicker

2impendingdoom

You can try a mozilla add on called RECAP which might give you access to some pacer docs.

carmencita

I can't do this . But someone please get on this and upvoat.

abcdefg222

Carmencita? Any good information found here? Anywhere to find any overview?Anything else found regarding the Epstein connection below? Hoping to get some direction here.

carmencita

Sorry, I said JA & JP, I now realize you said Epstein. Working on too many cases at once.

carmencita

Under COURT LISTENER there is the case of Napolis vs Aquino, there are words like satanic, freshly murdered children and children to sexually blackmail politicians. How do you think this involves Alefantis or JP?

carmencita

Am still looking this all over, but why is ICE involved in this? Are these trafficked children featured in the CP? Also if this was a 2 or 3 tiered level operation, then why is there such a low sentence of 5 years. It might be a good idea to start looking into the Judge. I am also looking into a much bigger and larger research project today. Will finish reading this up now.

abcdefg222

Thanks for your response. Theres def a lot here to go thru that I'd never seen. I'll look closer.

Beaucephus

Downloading now.

carmencita

Whoa!

Beaucephus

We got it! LINK

carmencita

Yeah.

Beaucephus

No, I guess I meant installing RECAP (suggested below) Hold on while I figure this thing out.

carmencita

I have been at this for quite a while. I can wait.

carmencita

Are you talking abut HP and Apple?