From the email:

>"Backbone is the reason I got involved with the protest against Shell’s Arctic drilling plans. It was exactly what I needed to emerge from a ten year hiatus in my activism

I heard about Shell’s plan and a kayaktivist training program. There was a sliding-fee scale so anybody could afford it. They were ready to train anyone – no prior experience needed – just sign up and come on out. “We’ll teach you what you need to know. “ So I did. They offered, and I just went for it.

---

The answers seem to be relevant to that.

Night kayaking - Protest go on during the night

Young, old, etc - What kind of people come out and protest

Victories - Successful protests

IMO.

did you read the whole email about paddling at night because it makes sense in the context?

"We did beautiful actions like the nighttime Luminary Flotilla. Of course it was gorgeous, the art, the lights, the rap artists, the native flute and drumming. But it was also meant to strengthen our skills and capacity – how to paddle at night, how to stay together, increase our situational awareness and understand the challenges of communication over water. It was so fulfilling to experience this beautiful connection of colorful, creative, wonderful art, and people committed to creating a brighter future for the world."

This is actually interesting I knew there would be more code to be broken its just a matter of time.

Ok, where did you get this definition from? I don't want us to be led astray by code words we can't source out.

Further, remember that they hide their activity amidst the noise of normal things. Much like the possible "food references", not every reference to paddles is going to refer to that with kids.

And kayaking, thus paddling, at night is also not that farfetched, hence:

https://www.kayalu.com/k/recommendation_kayak_light_paddling_at_night_fishing_angling.php

Again, not saying you couldn't be right about this, but sourcing where you got that code from will help us here.

Very interesting OP. This definitely needs investigation. The more because the paid shill is telling us not to investigate.

Just because they are over-the-top kayakers with a kause does not mean they are sexually related. Lefties love to bring their kids to virtue signaling events. I don't see anything here to investigate. Edit: The above sentence got me called a shill. Maybe I should have said it this way: Just because they are over-the-top kayakers with a kause does not mean they are sexually related. Lefties love to bring their kids to virtue signaling events. OP has not provided any worthwhile proof worthy of investigation.